Talk:Presupposition

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Mid‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Philosophy: Logic High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2019 and 6 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HuaiC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jhj43, Zehrahusnain, Rebecca0725. Peer reviewers: Splacanica, Michelle Goldberg.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

or

I've removed a big chunk of anonymously-contributed original research. It seemed to have been written by someone with poor English and didn't really make sense. I started fleshing it out, but then realised it was original research, so decided to just cut it.

Also, who is "Russell"? Bertrand Russell? Hairy Dude 13:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

word

I'm unclear what the "pre" adds to "supposition". Could it be tautological? To suppose is to do something prior to doing something else. If I suppose you're in the pub when I'm on my way there, I do it before I arrive. I can't do it once I'm there and know whether you are too. pauldanon 20061024

"Presupposition" is the standard term, whether it's tautological or not. I don't think it is: it reflects the fact that presuppositions are suppositions that the speaker takes for granted, or must be part of the common ground prior to the utterance of the sentence in order for it to be a felicitous one. Other "suppositions" or implications don't have the same status. For example, a false entailment of a sentence makes that sentence fanse, not infelicitous, and it is not taken for granted, but rather asserted as the content at issue. Neither 01:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My wife is not pregnant

My wife is not pregnant should be true even if I do not have a wife because then my wife is nonexistent. Nonexistent things are not pregnant. Therefore my (nonexistent) wife is not pregnant.

Atul Prasad

No, this is not true. Truth value (true or false) can only be assigned to a proposition if it is clear what the NPs are referring to. If you say "my wife" and you don't have one, no referent can be assigned to the NP "my wife". Thus the truth value for the entire sentence cannot be "calculated". 84.75.229.168 03:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it depends on context. I'll doublecheckTutonite (talk) 03:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The classic example is "The present king of France is bald." Bertrand Russell would say such a sentence has no truth value because it is meaningless. It doesn't extend to any object in this world. Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 02:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between presumption and presupposition

I really can't see the difference between presumption and presupposition. One is an assumption made before something, the other is the act of supposing before something - surely they are identical.

Please can someone help clear this up. 80.254.146.36 (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Van Dijk's CDA

Hello everyone! I noticed that one of the links to van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis has been renamed and is no longer functional. Additionally, I saw that the article writes, "... 'dissendent research' aimed to 'expose' and 'resist social inequality'" while the source writes, "With such dissident research, critical discourse analysts take explicit position, and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately resist social inequality." Despite citing the source by using quotes, I feel that the structure of these two sentences is more or less the same. The wording can be changed a little. Lastly, "dissident" is misspelled as "dissendent" in the article. HuaiC (talk) 16:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Resources to Consider

Abusch, Dorit. “Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives.” Journal of Semantics, vol. 27, no. 1, Oxford University Press, Aug. 2009, pp. 37–80, doi:10.1093/jos/ffp009.
Maier, Emar. “Reference, Binding, and Presupposition: Three Perspectives on the Semantics of Proper Names.” Erkenntnis, vol. 80, no. Supplement 2, Springer Netherlands, May 2015, pp. 313–33, doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9702-1.
Salmon, William. “Conventional Implicature, Presupposition, and the Meaning of Must.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, no. 14, Elsevier B.V., 2011, pp. 3416–30, doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.011.

HuaiC (talk) 17:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Presupposition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927072329/http://cf.hum.uva.nl/computerlinguistiek/henk/ to http://cf.hum.uva.nl/computerlinguistiek/henk

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]