Talk:Fudai daimyō

Military history: Asian / Japanese / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Japan High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 07:39, June 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Fudai vs. Fudai daimyo?[edit]

This article links to the ja wiki's article for "fudai daimyo." However, this article's title is still fudai. The fact that the ja wiki splits it into two articles-- fudai and fudai daimyo respectively-- bears some consideration. Are there any opinions on this? -Tadakuni (talk) 23:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The English article covers the topic of fudai daimyo. I'd favor renaming it that. And renaming Tozama to match. Fg2 (talk) 00:18, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I go ahead and move/rename? I've got the sources on hand right now to do so and expand/cite the new articles well. -Tadakuni (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I won't protest Fg2 (talk) 00:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]