Jump to content

Talk:Chamba, Himachal Pradesh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 06:29, 30 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject India}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Former good articleChamba, Himachal Pradesh was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 9, 2010Good article nomineeListed
January 20, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 8, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Chamba is known for its own school of Pahari paintings (pictured), which deal with themes of Hindu deities and nature?
Current status: Delisted good article

Images

[edit]

Hi ks_bluechip. I request that you permit us to use the images requested to help make this a good article. Check the history of the article. We've put a lot of hard work into it. I go by the name Dr. Blofeld and along with Nvvchar am the main contributor to this article. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • History of princely Chamba Royalark
  • History and Genealogy of Chamba princely state Queensland University

Theese need putting into inline citations as they are currently loose in the reference section. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 12:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GAR

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delist as the article fails criterion 2. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A GA from 2010. There's quite a lot of unsourced content in here that needs to be addressed for this to remain a GA. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist, a lot of unsourced text, and Music of Chamba section looks bad. Artem.G (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

.