Talk:Glacier, British Columbia

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Canada: British Columbia / Geography / Communities Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian communities.

History, I think....

FWIR Glacier was the location of the main construction camp for the Connaught Tunnel, which is just east of it, and at one time had an actual population, not just for rail construction but after it, with the highway's opening, as a needed stop at the top of the highway (which wasn't as easy a drive when opened as it is now). Old census data may show something, or any related docs on railway tourism/construction etc.....Skookum1 (talk) 15:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glacier, British Columbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160306053629/http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/rep-reg/place-lieu.aspx?id=4572&pid=0 to http://www.historicplaces.ca/en/rep-reg/place-lieu.aspx?id=4572&pid=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

The first sentence needs to clarify the distinction between the current railway line summit and the road (former railway) summit. This confusion is also evident in The History, I think.... talk comment.

Prior to the Connaught Tunnel opening, the line passed over the summit. The 1st Roger's Pass station (W of the summit) moved about 3 km to the 2nd (E of the summit), https://www.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.8_04859_131/24?r=0&s=4 , https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/chung/chungtext/items/1.0356755#p332z-5r0f:roger (pp. 43-45) and the 3rd and 4th locations were closer to the summit itself. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/chung/chungtext/items/1.0357107#p97z-3r0f:roger

Meanwhile, a station existed at the CP Glacier House (hotel remnants just beyond the SE end of today's Illecillewaet Campground). https://www.google.ca/maps/@51.2608989,-117.492748,2a,75y,270h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssd18_nTwMTR7JMK30kHs6Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 The disused CP small stone bridge, in that locale, is a quaint structure. Ross Peak, a flag stop, was within a km of the later Glacier station. When the tunnel opened, the summit line and these stations closed.

The log station building, near the W portal, was in a sorry state the last time I saw it a few years ago. I believe the national heritage designation means that although CP can't pull it down, they can allow it to fall down of its own accord. "Terminal" is a misnomer, since this was never the end of the line. The Rocky Mountaineer, which makes no intermediate stops, has been the only passenger service on this route during the past three decades. The stop appears to have closed in the mid-1960s. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/chung/chungtext/items/1.0372810#p6z-4r0f:glacier Although listed in later timetables, assumedly as a reference point, it is not marked even as a flag stop. However, in the pre-Via Rail era, it may have continued in use for pre-arranged stops.

The community of Glacier, which had a c.1920 population of 200, declined dramatically after the closure of Glacier House. A post office and school once existed. About 1.5 km W of the log station is the Loop Brook Trail (immediately E of Loop Brook Campground). Along the trail from the highway carpark can be seen the nearest of the stone pillars https://www.google.ca/maps/@51.2592399,-117.5366361,2a,75y,270h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1ssr0yFtGN6k2D6dMC2Ov6xA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 of an S-loop CP used to gain elevation in ascending the pass from the W. The farther stone pillars can be observed along the loop trail.DMBanks1 (talk) 21:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

To the degree to which the content and sources are accurate, the "Glacier station" article is largely a duplication of the essence of the respective paragraphs of the "Glacier, British Columbia" article. To clarify the context and to avoid needing to document the collapse of this once fine building in both articles, it may be simpler to merge the articles. DMBanks1 (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 13:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]