Talk:Rafael Buenaventura
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Rafael Buenaventura appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 August 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Tabula rasa
[edit]I've archived the discussion, which had not been added to for 18 months - wormcast (talk) 13:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
"Prominent"
[edit]I don't know if some here are aware of the meaning of "prominent". "Prominent" and "competent" or "professional" or "experienced" are not synonyms. --Bone1234 (talk) 02:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Referred to this edit. Bone1234 (talk) 02:07, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, "prominent" in this context meant "leading, important, or well-known" - all of which describe Mr. Buenaventura as a banker prior to his appointment as Governor. He could very well have been a low-profile crony until said appointment made him prominent, but he was not. Hence the use of the term is not redundant. Besides, last time I checked, notability was the standard for Wikipedia inclusion (WP:N), not prominence; it is not automatically the case that someone is prominent simply because they are notable. -Wormcast (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Your talk doesn't really have any sense, but in my observation... Bone1234 (talk) 04:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, "prominent" in this context meant "leading, important, or well-known" - all of which describe Mr. Buenaventura as a banker prior to his appointment as Governor. He could very well have been a low-profile crony until said appointment made him prominent, but he was not. Hence the use of the term is not redundant. Besides, last time I checked, notability was the standard for Wikipedia inclusion (WP:N), not prominence; it is not automatically the case that someone is prominent simply because they are notable. -Wormcast (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)