This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 02:28, 13 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Law}}, {{WikiProject Middle Ages}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}}, {{WikiProject Women}}, {{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: needs-infobox.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 02:28, 13 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Law}}, {{WikiProject Middle Ages}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}}, {{WikiProject Women}}, {{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: needs-infobox.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Every topic on wikipedia should be WP:NOTABLE, which requires multiple RS that address "the topic directly and in detail". What are these RS that address the topic directly and in detail? Dictionary entries[1][2][3] seem like a trivial mention and therefore wouldn't count.VRtalk20:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are links to entire civil codes reflecting the term in French and Philippine law. I've also seen passing mentions to concubinage laws in Brazil and Mexico, but I need to research it. Notability just requires that there is clear evidence of the use of the term out there. But yes, it's definitely still stubby. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Translating a current law from Latin into a modern language is not “a revival”, it is simply a translation. Most legal systems of Europe were translated from Latin to modern languages about in the same period. Concubinage laws have been present throughout the entire Middle Age. --Grufo (talk) 20:36, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
