Jump to content

Talk:Geisel School of Medicine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 17:29, 14 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Higher education}}, {{WikiProject Hospitals}}, {{WikiProject Medicine}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good articleGeisel School of Medicine was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 1, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 21, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 25, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 22, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article

Copyedit

Hi,

I will be copyediting this article, provided that you are available in case I need clarification or have questions. I look forward to working with you! --Malachirality (talk) 02:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry, I've been away for several days. I'll be happy to answer any questions you have -- just ask here or on my talk page. Thanks! Kane5187 (talk) 20:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any over-arching concerns or prose issues that you would like to see addressed? I'm reading over the lead and first section, and while there are some minor issues (too many parentheses IMO), the style and "voice" of the prose seems more or less good. Were there are specific problems/concerns regarding the text that were brought up in FAC/peer review/etc.? --Malachirality (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There wasn't anything specific, I just wanted to have a copyedit done for the FAC to get another pair of eyes on the article and ensure that it's up to snuff. However, the FAC was closed just today, so the copyedit isn't a pressing issue anymore. In fact, there's probably a lot more important articles in line, so I'll withdraw the copyedit request and resubmit it at a later time when it's represented at FAC. Thanks for your help, though! Kane5187 (talk) 08:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok then. I read through most of the article and didn't find any big problems. Just be sure to use "logical quotation", which means that punctuation marks go outside the quote marks unless the "sense" of the punctuation is a part of the quoted material. You might also consider using the em dash to replace some parentheses in the case of longer parenthetical phrases. I'm going to move this over to proofreading then, where it will probably languish forever until someone comes along and takes a look at it. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a note on my talk page. --Malachirality (talk) 16:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship between DMS and DHMC

I think I need clarification on DMS and DHMC. This could help the article.

DMS is not DHMC. There's a Dean of DMS (S.Spielberg). There's a separate President of Dartmouth Hitchcock Clinic and a President of Mary Hitchcock Hospital.

DHMC may not be a legal entity. See http://www.dhmc.org/webpage.cfm?site_id=2&org_id=566&gsec_id=0&sec_id=0&item_id=30016 The fact that the VA is listed suggests this as the VA is owned by the US Government. There is a separate President of Mary Hitchcock Hospital and a President of Dartmouth Hitchcock Clinic.

DMS is this http://www.dhmc.org/webpage.cfm?site_id=2&org_id=566&morg_id=0&sec_id=0&gsec_id=39&item_id=41399

I think there is some overlap. The Chairman of the Department of Surgery of Dartmouth is one and the same Chairman of the hospital surgery department.(need confirmation, difficult because the medical school website surgery department link is the hospital surgery website - see http://dms.dartmouth.edu/about/academics/ ) Congolese fufu (talk) 04:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Understanding the situation is important to write the article. I think medical students do their first 2 years at the medical school then do rotations at DHMC. Faculty members who are M.D.'s are both DMS/DHMC. Some Ph.D. faculty members are DMS only. So the programs are mixed into both DMS and DHMC but the WP article is DMS only. This is becoming clear but citations search continues (and is necesary for the article.) Congolese fufu (talk) 04:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote to Dartmouth asking the above. The answer they give will be original research, but it will guide me to reliable sources which will have the answer. Congolese fufu (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
According to this (and as noted in the article), DMS is part of DHMC, which is a broad organization including MHMH, the VA Clinic, and the Dartmouth-Hitchcock clinic. Kane5187 (talk) 05:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the GA, I certainly haven't given up on this article for FA. I just figured that in the meantime while it's being improved, I think it already meets GA criteria and would like to see it begin to receive recognition for its quality. A GA review, even if successful, will likely bring additional suggestions for improvement and bridge the lengthy gap between B-class rating and FA. Kane5187 (talk) 06:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote to DHMC (ok, original research) and they told me MHMH sponsers the residencies but that DMS faculty run it. See www.acgme.org > search programs/sponsers > sponsoring organizations > New Hampshire. So that website confirms what DHMC said. The DMS chairman of surgery, for example, is also the MHMH surgery chairman. Sorry for being picky but at least we are precise now. Congolese fufu (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

a little research needed?

A little research, not quite original research needed? Are some of the faculty well known? Perhaps we should look at the department websites to see if any faculty are well known. Sometimes the chairman is. Sometimes another professor is. Then we can use non-Dartmouth websites to confirm this.

I would like to make this article so good that nobody will object on content grounds and then only will object on technicalities that can be fixed. Congolese fufu (talk) 02:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Choice of alumni

How was the choice of notable alumni chosen? I don't know Dartmouth but I would be afraid that the list of alumni are not notable or that some notable people are left out.

What we may have here is a list of alumni that have Wikipedia article and, by inference, are notable by Wikipedia criteria, which is not the same thing as truly notable and famous.

It seems to be easier to research and fix the notable faculty but the alumni is a tough question and problem to fix. I will be thinking about the answer. Congolese fufu (talk) 02:02, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I don't see why using just those who have Wikipedia articles is a problem. It provides notability, prevents us from inserting just any old alum (or faculty member) in there, and is the overarching system used at virtually every other article on educational institutions. Kane5187 (talk) 09:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA pass

This article easily passes GA. Good work. I only changed a few minor things as I read over it. Wrad (talk) 02:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Geisel School of Medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geisel School of Medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geisel School of Medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Geisel School of Medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Geisel School of Medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Hall

Dana Hall has been renamed Anonymous Hall [sic] and is no longer associated with Dartmouth Medical School. Therefore I deleted a clause that cited both it and a lawn, the latter of which struck me as an irrelevant detail. (Crissccrossed with concrete sidewalks, the lawn is nothing like a typical college quadrangle or green.) As collateral damage, references to Remsen and Vail went with the clause. Perhaps they should come back. Mdmi (talk) 01:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Geisel School of Medicine

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Also overly reliant on non-independent sources. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics for the school are outdated, citing numbers from 2007 and 2013. History section stops at 2012. Uncited passages are also present throughout the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Geisel_School_of_Medicine&oldid=1207376425"