Talk:Resolution Guyot

Resolution Guyot is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 2, 2023.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 12, 2019	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Seamounts (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seamounts, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SeamountsWikipedia:WikiProject SeamountsTemplate:WikiProject SeamountsSeamounts articles

Geology: Periods Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Resolution Guyot is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Geological periods task force.

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oceans Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oceans, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of oceans, seas, and bays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OceansWikipedia:WikiProject OceansTemplate:WikiProject OceansOceans articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Oceans To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : List of oceanographers, create a comprehensive article on Concentrations of marine debris out of all the gyre and "garbage patch" articles
Copyedit : Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Expand : Coral Sea, Endeavour Strait, Greenland Sea, Solomon Sea
Photo : find images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in the oceans
Stubs : Oceanography stub articles, Marine geography stub articles, Aleutian Trench, Bellingshausen Sea, Caernarfon Bay, Gerlache Strait, Gulf of Oman, Iceland Sea, Draft:Terrance (octopus)
Update : Botany Bay, Wilkins Sound, Mariana Trench, Challenger Deep
Verify : Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Bering Sea, Gulf of Aden, Iceberg B-15, Ionian Sea, Japan Trench, Moreton Bay, Sound (geography), Timor Sea
Other : add ISBNs and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from Aral Sea; check La Belle (ship) for GA status; improve citations or footnotes and remove excessive or inappropriate external links from MS Estonia

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Bathymetric map

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: Is there any reason this page doesn't have a figure depicting the bathymetry and shape of Resolution Guyot? I'm not seeing anything about it on the FAC. I can try and make one using GEBCO data and GMT. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the standard reason why Wikipedia articles don't have an image: There isn't a non-copyrighted one. If you can create or get a non-copyrighted one that would be great. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added these two images; please let me know if you have any feedback.

Balon Greyjoy (talk) 12:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems good but I am a little concerned that by using GEBCO data it might be a derivative work of GEBCO; Nikkimaria, what say you? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you're only using data it's fine - data is not typically copyrightable. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The gridded bathymetric data is the only thing I got from GEBCO; I wrote the script to generate the plots (and am also a maintainer for PyGMT software). Balon Greyjoy (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like you are fine to add these, then. Balon Greyjoy, if whatever-you-used-to-create-these-images is scalable, there is a lot of other articles that could similary be expanded. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jo-Jo Eumerus and Vida0007: Would you like any changes or updates to the 3D bathymetric map for this article? I saw that it's nominated over at WP:TFAR and want to let you know that I can change the figure if you think it could be improved (different perspective angle, different region covered in the map, different color scheme). Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm okay with the current bathymetric map, but I wouldn't mind to see a different angle to it. Vida0007 (talk) 13:34, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same for me. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "The guyot was probably formed by a" to "The guyot was likely formed by a" Enter Demoman (talk) 21:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: same meaning. I think the current version is clearer. – small jars tc 15:11, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok Enter Demoman (talk) 16:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]