Jump to content

Talk:May Company Ohio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 05:26, 16 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
[edit]

The image Image:Voinovich-mayor.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of locations

[edit]

In my opinion, the list of locations should stay. I think it is important to note where each of the company's stores were located. While each location is not notable in a national context, it is part of the region's history and certainly the history of the company. I believe the list improves the article, and removing it does not improve its quality. --DangApricot (talk) 17:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "While each location is not notable in a national context". I presume you mean in the context of the company as a whole. In that case, you have just proven my point as to why these locations do not merit inclusion, and that is because they lack notability. I am reverting now. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:45, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You sound angry! I didn't mean to anger you. I meant "national context" in the context of American history. The people who wrote these lists should have cited their research, I agree. I guess people who like this historical local history, like me and User:Pubdog, are outnumbered, and I accept defeat :-( . P.S. I was surprised to see the Inclusionist and Local History userboxes on your user page when you are opposed to maintaining lists of these stores, but maybe it's just me. --DangApricot (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think this guy understands how important former locations list are. Ive been fighting with this punk for the last few days about keeping former locations lists for Big Bear Stores. Dont accept defeat! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Datrain021 (talkcontribs) 01:44, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]