Jump to content

Talk:The Theory of the Leisure Class

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 12:55, 16 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Sentence needs rewriting

[edit]

I'm a native English speaker and I can't make sense of this (21st century subheading, end of first paragraph). Moved here in case anyone can work on making sense of it:

That the cultural irrelevance of the sociology and the economics of Veblen is in his dismissal of the theory of rational expectations of 18th-century classical economics, and that the American leisure-class would risk social and economic irrelevance if unemployed.[1]

References

  1. ^ Landsburg 2007.

MartinPoulter (talk) 14:17, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]