This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 16:32, 22 February 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Palaeontology}}, {{WikiProject Mammals}}, {{WikiProject Cats}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:32, 22 February 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Palaeontology}}, {{WikiProject Mammals}}, {{WikiProject Cats}}.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
A fact from Pachypanthera appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 October 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the early big cat Pachypanthera may have weighed as much as 142 kilograms (313 lb) and had teeth similar to a hyena's?
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the early big cat Pachypanthera may have eaten bones like a hyena? Source: de Bonis, L.; Chaimanee, Y.; Grohé, C.; Chavasseau, O.; Mazurier, A.; Suraprasit, K.; Jaeger, J. J. (2023). "A new large pantherine and a sabre-toothed cat (Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae) from the late Miocene hominoid-bearing Khorat sand pits, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, northeastern Thailand". The Science of Nature. 110 (5). 42.
ALT1: ... that the early big cat Pachypanthera may have weighed as much as 142 kilograms (313 lb) and had teeth similar to a hyena's?
ALT2: ... that the early big cat Pachypanthera may have weighed as much as 142 kilograms (313 lb) and eaten bones?
Reviewed: [[]]
Comment: Both 4444hhhh and I have nominated less than 5 DYKs before, so quid pro quo is not required.
Overall: Article is dependent on a single paper from a very reliable source. Should be fine, but if a popular science source picks it up, or another paper is published, would be worth adding in as a second reference for readers to follow ASAP. —siroχo05:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]