Jump to content

Talk:Tropical Storm Bill (2003)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by BattyBot (talk | contribs) at 14:16, 1 March 2024 (top: Fixed/removed unknown WikiProject parameter(s) and general fixes per WP:Talk page layout). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Featured articleTropical Storm Bill (2003) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 29, 2017.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 17, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
March 1, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
February 27, 2023Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Featured article

Merge

[edit]

Horrible writing, and little info for a non-notable storm. I will merge this by tonight if no one objects. Hurricanehink 19:52, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basically a stub. Go ahead. Jdorje 21:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Allow me, while my axe is still sharp ;). -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 06:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree. I think writing this kind of articles is unworthy for the project. Since there is no more info you can merge it. juan andrés 04:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, this merge proposal was when the article was written back in January. It was merged, but recently re-written. The new article is informative enough to stay, and is already B-class quality. Hurricanehink 13:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Todo2

[edit]

Good work on this. Some things that can be improved include a longer storm history, damage totals by state, and references for all other things. The thing about summer camps and schools is currently uncited, but it could be in references at the bottom. Also, the storm peaked at 60 mph, not 70. In general, you should use more info from the TCR, including references to low wind damage and the tornado. All in all, it's passable, and currently it's a B-. Hurricanehink 13:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's missing one key thing to be called B-class- metric units. When you get that, it will be B-class again. Hurricanehink 15:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Added metric units. Storm05 15:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. Hurricanehink (talk) 16:32, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on Tropical Storm Bill (2003). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And not all links were repaired by the bot. All fixed now. sst 04:35, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Duplicate links
  • Ref formatting inconsistencies
  • Needs alt text
  • Appears to be a little bit of scholarly literature

Making this one a notes section since the scholarly literature isn't extensive. NoahTalk 20:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CCI check not done. NoahTalk 20:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]