This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot(talk | contribs) at 16:34, 2 March 2024(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 7 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:34, 2 March 2024 by Cewbot(talk | contribs)(Maintain {{WPBS}}: 7 WikiProject templates. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.)
This article was nominated for deletion on 9 September 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leeds, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Leeds on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LeedsWikipedia:WikiProject LeedsTemplate:WikiProject LeedsLeeds articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Murder of Jayne MacDonald is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Why would you nominate this article for deletion? There is a whole article about her murderer but nothing about the victim. Yet her death marked a change in the course of the investigation. It also brings up the issue of sexism in murder investigations and her mother made legal history by suing the murderer. Please give reasons why you don't think this is not worth an entry because this feels a lot like sexism to me.SandrinaHatman (talk) 03:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
I also think it is morally wrong to include information about a female murder victim on the page of the male murderer and for her not to have to space to show who she was and how people felt about her. That is completely sexist and dehumanising of the victim. SandrinaHatman (talk) 03:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@SandrinaHatman:Wikipedia:"Murder of" articles gives the criteria for the creation of separate articles. If you believe that the Wikipedia guidance that was reached by consensus is wrong, then please separately raise the issue about the criteria and argue to the community about why it should be changed. Putting the complaint on an article talk page will be unseen and will be equivalent to yelling at the clouds. — billinghurstsDrewth03:53, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You have misapplied what the article says. It says that that not all murder victims are notable and deserve a page - I agree. But you are deliberately deleting a page of a notable victim. This is inconsistent with eg victims of Jack the Ripper who all have pages. And with the pages of other notable female victims. The article you cite says that where there is coverage of the victim beyond locality they are notable. What don't you understand about this? My problem is with your judgement and actions, not the article per se. I will address the embedded sexism within that separately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SandrinaHatman (talk • contribs) 04:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]