Jump to content

Talk:Dark forest hypothesis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Elysdir (talk | contribs) at 05:19, 15 March 2024 (→‎Phrase vs hypothesis: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk20:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that some scientists believe we may live in a "dark forest"?

Source: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JBIS...68..142Y/abstract (PDF)

Converted from a redirect by Shibbolethink (talk). Nominated by LordPeterII (talk) at 16:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • ALT1 ... that some scientists believe we may live in a "dark forest" universe?
for your consideration. I personally prefer the original hook as it retains more of a surprise element, but ALT1 probably is a safer bet if accuracy is deemed more important. ("universe" could either be wikilinked or not) –LordPeterII (talk) 15:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: @LordPeterII: Good article! Everything looks good so I will approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC) Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Phrase vs hypothesis

I made an edit to this article based on the linked-to Brin article. Brin uses the term “Deadly Probes” to describe something that as far as I can tell is nearly identical to the “Dark Forest” hypothesis that Wikipedia attributes to Liu Cixin. I don’t understand why my change was reverted. The revert notice says something to the effect that if I have another source, we can discuss; the other source is the Brin article. I don’t understand why various Wikipedia articles maintain that the Liu Cixin novel is the origin of the hypothesis, when Brin clearly stated it in 1983. Can we reinstate my changes? —Elysdir (talk) 05:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]