Talk:Salyut 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Salyut 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Spaceflight: Space stations Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the space stations working group.

Military history: Technology / Russian & Soviet / Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

2007

article says salyut 2 lost 4 solar panels and it had 2 solar arrays. what is the difference between a solar panel and a solar array? Filanca 15:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My guess is that panel refers to one rectangular section of a solar array and an array is an entire wing of panels. 69.12.155.64 01:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons

It's part of the Almaz program, but the article doesn't list any weapons. Was it just a prototype for salyut 3, or did it have weapons not listed in the article? 69.12.155.64 01:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong dates

The article says it "was launched April 4, 1973"... and "on April 11, 1973, 11 days after launch" there was an accident. There is a mistaken here. Please, check these dates. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 08:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Broke up in orbit

According to the article as of 2011-01-04, the Salyut 2 broke up in orbit. And per the 1995 NASA paper by Portree, the Salyut re-entered as multiple pieces, with "all trackable pieces reentered by May 28, 1973." . So I'm wondering if it is really appropriate imply that days in orbit, no. of orbits, and distance traveled are quite as precise as stated in the article today:

"Days in orbit 54 days"
"Number of orbits 866"
"Distance travelled 35,163,530 kilometres (21,849,600 mi)"

It seems to me we ought to remove these claims from the infobox, given the particular circumstances of the spacecraft and, by one account at least, it's multiple trackable pieces in orbit after the spacecraft failure. N2e (talk) 15:08, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to all the references I can find, a few parts, such as solar panels, came off, however the core station remained largely intact. I've found four items catalogued under 1973-017 that are not associated with the disintegration of the Proton third stage, which according to Jonathan McDowell's copy of the Satellite Catalogue, correspond to the station itself, and three pieces of its solar panels. --G W… 15:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, much better now, with substantial, and substantially more, sources on the various claims added to the article in the past week. I think the sources do identify that the spacecraft was mostly intact on reentry now. I will happily go with consensus on leaving the precise number of days, orbits, etc. in the article. Furthermore, the entire article is MUCH improved over its condition just one week ago. N2e (talk) 01:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Salyut 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5il9QixAg?url=http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf to http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/RP1357.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crew?

The Infobox style was changed way back in 2007, and at that time Crew changed from "0" to "3". Why? It never was occupied. A minor point but ... . GeeBee60 (talk) 12:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]