User talk:JoBrLa

Auxiliary route sections

Regarding this edit and similar ones, a few points are in order

MOS:HEAD says there are two problems with that section heading:
1. It should not repeat the subject of the article, so the "of I-80 in Iowa" part should not be there
2. The heading should be in Sentence case, not Title Case; in Sentence case, only the initial word and any words that are proper nouns are capitalized, not every world over five letter in length like a newspaper headline or book title...
According to MOS:DASH, we don't use spaced hyphens like that, and in fact, a simple colon there is better.
According to MOS:CONVERSIONS, we need to include the metric conversion for American measurements
According to MOS:ICON, we should never place an icon like that in the middle of a sentence.

I-80 in Iowa is a Featured Article, so while you're free to edit them, major changes like the addition of an entire section, should be discussed on the article's talk page first. Also, any additions to a FA need to comply with the Manual of Style... minor glitches are fine and can be corrected, but the number you made would make it easier for someone to just remove the entire section and not retain any of your additions. Imzadi 1979 → 19:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to say something to the same effect, but I was beaten to the punch. I took the advice given above and removed the section entirely. –Fredddie ™ 23:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a friendly reminder, we don't constantly revert articles around here. That's called WP:Edit warring, and doing it can get your editing access blocked. Rather, I suggest you follow the tenets of WP:BRD. You were Bold to add the section, you've been Reverted, and now is the time to Discuss it. Imzadi 1979 → 02:09, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to rethink some things, especially in a case like: Interstate_40_in_Oklahoma#Auxiliary_Routes. First off, you're still mis-formatting the heading. Sentence case means "routes" would not be capitalized, and since there is only one, the heading should be singular not plural. Since there is only one, a bulleted list is overkill as well. Combining a sentence about this single 3dI along with a paragraph or two about the business routes, similar to Interstate 75 in Michigan#Related trunklines. Imzadi 1979 → 02:38, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 65 in Kentucky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East End Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jct I-635 and I-29 and US-71.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jct I-635 and I-29 and US-71.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –Fredddie ™ 13:19, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:EBS Test Screen.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:EBS Test Screen.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:08, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Can you please explain why you reverted my edit [1] without leaving a summary? --Rs chen 7754 18:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you removed what I added in the first place? --JoBrLa (talk) 19:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As can be seen from the edit summary, and as Imzadi1979 explained to you above, it violates WP:MOSICON. --Rs chen 7754 21:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please realize that if you continue to revert against community consensus, you will likely be blocked indefinitely from editing. This is the encyclopedia written by many people, not the encyclopedia written by JoBrLa. If you show us that you are not capable of working and collaborating with other people, that will not be a good thing. --Rs chen 7754 21:28, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You still haven't convinced or sufficiently explained to me how including notes on auxiliary routes is detrimental to these articles. --JoBrLa (talk) 22:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read WP:MOSICON? Have you read what Imzadi1979 wrote at the top of the page? --Rs chen 7754 22:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hi, JoBrLa. I do not see where the source draws the conclusion that the exchange "effectively ended the once-cordial on-air relationship between Rome and Stern...". You should consider reconstructing your edit so that its content is supported by the cited source. Tiderolls 00:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, it doesn't. That info came from Rome's own remarks in later episodes of his show. I have removed that line from the paragraph. --JoBrLa (talk) 01:04, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response. Tiderolls 01:13, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Editors have repeatedly asked you to STOP adding auxiliary route sections to articles. You have refused to stop. Therefore, if you continue doing this, you will be reported, and will likely face sanctions, including up to an indefinite block from Wikipedia. --Rs chen 7754 05:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fine! Ban me! I'm sick and tired of you Wikipedia Nazis undoing my fruitful and beneficial contributions to this site! You're all pricks and assholes! >:( --JoBrLa (talk) 21:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I-70 in WV

I reverted this edit.

Per MOS:HEAD, we use what is called "Sentence case" for section headings. As I've tried to explain to you before, that means that only the first word of the heading and any proper nouns are capitalized. The term "auxiliary route" is not a proper noun, so the "r" in "route" does not get capitalized in a section heading.
Since there is only one such auxiliary route, adding a bulleted list is overkill. A bulleted list might be fine if there were multiple entries, but there are not.
Such a short section, completely lacking any citations, is also very poor form.
I-70 in WV is at WP:FAC, a forum designed to review and polish the best articles on Wikipedia. Adding poorly formatted and knowingly mis-formatted content to an article at FAC is a bad thing for an editor to do. Maybe you didn't know that, but know you do.

In short, please stop your poor editing practices, please learn from what others are trying to teach you, and then please do as we ask. If not, please don't be surprised if your actions warrant negative consequences. Imzadi 1979 → 06:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Admr Boltz 21:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JoBrLa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Willing to adhere to Wikipedia policies instead of using the site as a personal page, as I have done in the past

Decline reason:

This does not address your problematic edits. Yamla (talk) 16:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I think you will need to address in somewhat greater detail what you will do differently this time to avoid the problems that occurred in the past. Huon (talk) 01:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interstate 335 (Kansas) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interstate 335 (Kansas), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interstate 335 (Kansas)

Hello JoBrLa. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Interstate 335 (Kansas)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Interstate 335 (Kansas)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. –Fredddie ™ 03:29, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Larson PYL board.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michael Larson PYL board.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. AldezD (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Oh Carol and Other Big Hits.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Oh Carol and Other Big Hits.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NRSV Methodist Bible.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NRSV Methodist Bible.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JoBrLa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RSV Bible Meridian paperback.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RSV Bible Meridian paperback.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RSV CE large version.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RSV CE large version.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Neil Sedaka Oh Carol & One-Way Ticket.JPG

The file File:Neil Sedaka Oh Carol & One-Way Ticket.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Displaying more than one release not compliant with WP:NFCC#3a. Preferring the other image uploaded...

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PYL Publicity Shot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PYL Publicity Shot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Neil Sedaka Oh Carol 1974.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neil Sedaka Oh Carol 1974.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]