Talk:The Economist Democracy Index
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Economist Democracy Index article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Please read this notice before you attempt to edit the article or suggest a change in this talk page. This article is about the index compiled by the Economist Intelligence Unit, not based on the opinions of Wikipedia editors. Therefore, the index is not subject to modifications. Any suggestion of changing the index constitutes false representation of the EIU report, and will be dismissed. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 18 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Democracy Index to EIU Democracy Index. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Mexico is North America tmk
I've always learnt that Mexico is North America, but in this article it's listed as Latin America. 62.45.42.33 (talk) 15:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- This article follows the criteria of the Economist Democracy Index. You may disagree with it, but it is not for the article to challenge it. Gorpik (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the last table of the page: "Components Year 2023", column "Changes in score" in the line for the country "Chile" the quantity seems right (0.24) but the arrow UP seems wrong, because according to the previous table Chile's score went DOWN from 8.22 (in 2022) to 7.98 (in 2023) 2804:14C:60:9811:B68D:B8B5:4F72:C88F (talk) 17:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done Good catch, I doubled checked the citation and the score indeed fell from 8.22 to 7.98. The arrow now shows that the score decreased, thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 21:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect map legend
Either I'm horribly misreading the legend, or the legend is reversed for the map. The western countries are colored blue which, according to the map legend, classifies them as hybrid/authoritarian regimes. However, the data in the tables in the article show that their scores put them into the flawed/full democracy margin. Those tables are also correctly color-coded to the legend, as in North America's table entries are yellow which corresponds to the map legend's classification of yellow.
I think the legend corresponds to the color-coding of the tables in the article (or vice versa), but the map's colors are reversed. Either the legend + table colors should be changed to reflect the map, or the map changed to reflect the legend. 2001:48F8:7052:EBB:C882:123B:66DE:393 (talk) 22:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The colour scheme is the same throughout the article, map included. And the map legend reflects that correctly. Gorpik (talk) 16:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're right. I had an extension installed that for some reason exactly inverted the colors in the article. 2001:48F8:7052:EBB:4C2D:51DA:5460:F9A4 (talk) 20:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
article protection
The article should be protected again.
[Edit=Require administrator access] (indefinite) [Move=Require administrator access] (indefinite) 94.31.84.138 (talk) 13:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Seeing how there was one vandal edit shortly after the previous protection expired and nothing since, I think indefinite pending changes would probably be a good idea. The article's edit frequency is generally low. 2603:8001:8F40:5C:7407:64A:46AD:C2F0 (talk) 06:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)