Jump to content

Talk:Katie Hopkins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 17:32, 5 June 2024 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Katie Hopkins/Archive 2) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Former good article nomineeKatie Hopkins was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 16, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
June 20, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
July 13, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
July 20, 2007Articles for deletionKept
June 8, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
July 4, 2013Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
Current status: Former good article nominee

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 June 2023

She is not “far right”. Just right wing. Far right is someone like Adolph Hitler 2A02:C7C:BF08:9000:E45B:1EB7:9FA6:67EB (talk) 10:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Wikipedia does not publish the opinions of its editors. The label is based on reporting in reliable sources, many of which are provided in the inline citation right after the label. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

How can the "Index of Births, Marriages and Deaths in England and Wales, 1837–1983" (which even if it were correct would constitute original research) be cited for an apparent September 2004 marriage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.233.100 (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 June 2024

I request the removal of the wording ‘Far Right’ to just political and social commentator when describing Katie Hopkins, as this term has tremendously strong connotations of extremism and fascism which would put Ms Hopkins along the same lines as mass murders such as the likes of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, this can be construed as character deformation.

I also have noticed that there is another example of something that can be connoted as bias and needs to be changed with the photograph you chose to represent Katie Hopkins, as instead of using a photograph from a professional photoshoot like most Wikipedia pages, the person who made this chose a photograph of Ms Hopkins while she was on a podcast in the middle of speaking, you should change this to a more appropriate and flattering photograph taken by a professional photographer in the years 2008-2015.

Please take action on these two issues immediately.

Thank you. HarleyHarper31!! (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Reliable sources -- many of them -- ID Hopkins as far right. This is well-cited in the article. So no. If you are unhappy with "far right" it seems your beef is with Hopkins' career choice rather than with Wikipedia. -- M.boli (talk) 16:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bias Katie Hopkins page

Bias views on Katie Hopkins’ Wikipedia page, and how they need to be changed. HarleyHarper31!! (talk) 15:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]