Talk:Marvin Gaye (song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marvin Gaye (song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Marvin Gaye (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Marvin Gaye (song) is part of the Meghan Trainor's Billboard Hot 100 entries series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 21, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
October 17, 2023	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Meghan Trainor Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Meghan Trainor, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Meghan Trainor on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Meghan TrainorWikipedia:WikiProject Meghan TrainorTemplate:WikiProject Meghan TrainorMeghan Trainor articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Music Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marvin Gaye (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com/biz/search/charts?f%5B0%5D=is_bmdb_album_id%3A6639208
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160104175405/http://austriancharts.at/year.asp?cat=s&id=2015 to http://austriancharts.at/year.asp?cat=s&id=2015
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170106174130/http://hitparade.ch/charts/jahreshitparade to http://hitparade.ch/charts/jahreshitparade

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marvin Gaye (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150416232323/https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/marvin-gaye-feat.-meghan-trainor/id963236794 to https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/marvin-gaye-feat.-meghan-trainor/id963236794

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

I think there should be a section that talks about the song's critical reception. Fladoodle (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--N Ø 14:49, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marvin Gaye (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey MaranoFan, I'll review this. LOVI 33 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing this article, LOVI33. Looking forward to it!--N Ø 15:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead

Remove streaming from Format - source for that is from iTunes which is solely digital download

Sourced to Tidal now.

Is the 2014 recording year sourced?
Are you sure Soul should be included as a genre since it refers to solely to its references?

One of the critics stated it has a "modernized throwback soul sound".

Per Template:Infobox song, later releases should be included in the article, not infobox so remove Atlantic records.
Isn't this Puth's debut single? If so you should add something about that in the opening sentence.
Target music critics to Music journalism

Background and release

Target lead single to itself

Composition

Target retro to Retro style
Target verse to Song structure#Verse

Critical reception

Target music critics to Music journalism

Chart performance

North America

Looks good!

Oceania and Europe

Target Scottish Singles Chart to Scottish Singles and Albums Charts
Target French Singles Chart to Syndicat National de l'Édition Phonographique

Music video

Looks Good!

Live performances

Looks Good!

Track listing

Looks Good!

Credits and personnel

Target liner notes to itself

Charts

Weekly charts says 2014–15 but wasn't it released in 2015?

Certifications

Looks Good!

Release history

Remove streaming, sources are from iTunes.

References

Make sure all of these are archived.
Copyvio score needs work at 43.2%. Fix your quoting from ref 3
Change publisher to BBC for ref 8
Remove target to Entertainment Weekly on ref 19
Ref 51 is missing a website or publisher.
Ref 56: "jeff" → "Jeff"

External links

Looks Good!

Final comments and verdict

On hold for now. This article was really well written. Good job! LOVI 33 17:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've either done or responded to all of your comments.--N Ø 03:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great! ✓ Pass. LOVI 33 12:14, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.