Jump to content

User talk:Anynobody

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anynobody (talk | contribs) at 11:07, 18 June 2007 (est). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

response.

Responded on my talk page. SWATJester Denny Crane. 14:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really appreciate you taking the time to answer my question, I replied on your page to keep everything together. Anynobody 03:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dwarf planet

Hello... sorry, but I had to revert your edit at Dwarf planet. Charon is a unique case in that it is thought to possibly be part of a double-planet system (well, double dwarf planet now), based on Charon's large size relative to Pluto. This is not official, as the IAU has made no formal decision in this regard. However, it has been mentioned as a possible candidate for dwarf planet status, and was actually under consideration for designation as a planet under the initial IAU proposal last August. Hope this helps. --Ckatzchatspy 07:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Sorry about the lack of an edit comment at Dwarf planet - my bad.

Thank you for your courteous explanation, but I'm actually aware of these facts. Since the IAU hasn't made an official ruling, Charon is still orbiting Pluto (similar to how Pluto was still a planet while the debate about it's status carried on, and it changed whenn they made it official.) I agree with the proposal because the barycenter of their interaction is actually not inside either one, whereas the Earth/Moon barycenter is inside the diameter of the Earth making it obvious that the Moon is the one orbiting the Earth. However even though the proposal makes sense we ought not act like it has already been announced. Anynobody 07:55, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also copied the above to the Talk:Dwarf planet in case anyone else wants to discuss this. Anynobody 07:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for the nice note - I appreciate it. Cheers! --Ckatzchatspy 08:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you again, and you're welcome :) Anynobody 08:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sylvia Seegrist

Updated DYK query On 13 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sylvia Seegrist, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 00:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Anynobody 04:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Unless USS Avocet (AVP-4) was a WP:DYK, then yes it was. I'm more about article improvement than creation I guess. Anynobody 08:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • FYI: -- If you wish, you can now utilize the userbox: {{User DYK|1}}, and the number can be adjusted to show number of created articles appeared on DYK, which looks a little something like: {{User DYK}}, (plus the number inserted). You can also utilize the user box {{User Did You Know}}, by inserting {{User Did You Know|Sylvia Seegrist}} on your userpage. Yours, Smee 08:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

A tag has been placed on Anynobody/3RR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6, article mistakenly created in mainspace

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Metropolitan90 06:53, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I userfied it to User:Anynobody/3RR. Regards, MaxSem 08:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you :) Anynobody 08:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]