Talk:Colored

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Colored article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

African diaspora Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Unassessed

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Colored People / People of Color

These are both rather stupid phrases. They imply that caucasians are colorless, which is silly. Everybody is some color or other. Neither so-called white people nor so-called black people are any more colored or uncolored than anybody else. Nor is anybody really white or black; some people's skin is lighter or darker than other's, but not even the skin of a so-called albino is actually white. So-called white people are actually closer to being pink or reddish-yellow than "white". Somebody should invent terms for people of European ancestry and for people of African ancestry and for people of Asian ancestry that aren't based on this ridiculous color-coding. We've got terms like "Native American" and "Hispanic" for two of our ethnicities, and those aren't color-coded, so we should invent similar terms for so-called black and white people.

The terms "Colored" and "Coloured" have different meanings

shouldn't this article be merged/redirected with/to coloured? --DakAD 11:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, because they have different meanings. "Coloured" is the South African spelling for the word as it is used in the South African context, which differs greatly to the context in which the American spelling of the word "Colored" is used in the American context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.158.128.105 (talk • contribs)

Connotation of the phrase "people of color"

The article states that the phrase "people of color" is offensive because it makes a distinction that implies being white is the benchmark. While I do understand this is true, on the other hand, when you do a Google search on that phrase, over 8 million results are found. On the first couple of pages, those results seem to indicate to me that ethnic and racial minorities use that phrase extensively to create activist organizations to support one another. Wouldn't it be a more neutral point of view to say that the phrase "people of color" is used in the positive ways of banding people together for social change and support, as well as being of a negative connotation to others?

Strikes me as challenging to both address issues for a minority group yet still remain respectful and neutral in judgements. Kind of like the hypothetical situation of a group of women of similar age, weight, height, hair color, same dress color, etc. across the room - one of them black - yet, feeling uncomfortable saying Mary is the black woman. Is it just as dis-respectful of an aspect about Mary that is an important part of her identity to omit that obvious distinction?

I appreciate any input to help me understand this important issue. Nightngle 13:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Website for People of Color

http://crayonpeople.com/ is a website for people of color that has a category for Arabs but not Middle Easterners, or Mediterraneans. This I find inappropriate because Latins (especially those from Italy, weren't treated like they were part of the majority and negative stereotypes of them still persist today). Anti-Latin racism is still as big a problem as anti-Arab racism as many Spaniards, Portuguese, and Italians don't feel any whiter than Arabs.

Vestiges of "colored" in the Present Day

I'm surprized that there is no mention of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), which is very active today.

Brown Caucasians

It seems to be true that one particular trait shared by all blacks is that they they are descendants of Caucasians. Ergo, I would define them as being Brown Caucasians. There are blond Eskimos. Superslum 10:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The name NAACP is not a vestige of the past. It represents the true identity of the mixed-race people whom it attempts (feebly, of course) to bolster. Colored people had been produced in North America centuries ago. Why (I ask) are the multitudes of people pretending that there are no colored people? Superslum 11:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC) If you do not know how Jews were treated in Europe, click here. Superslum 15:19, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed your word 'colored' to blacks as it was inappropriate and I think what you said is completely goofy. I don't think blacks came from white people.

Proposed merger

Since the page 'women of color' is very short and contains little encyclopaedic information, I intend to merge it into this page soon. If anyone has any objections, please make them known here. Terraxos 01:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

women of color is a specific and politicized term that is based out of a sense of organizing. i believe that it deserves its own page, however small it may be.

Double standards?

"and is now archaic and potentially derogatory, except in certain narrow circumstances such as the name of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)."

Why don't they change it? Is it like the term "nigger" - you can only refer to a black guy as "nigger" if you are black? I don't understand why it's fine for some, yet for others it's completely outrageous to use the term. 82.163.182.119 10:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]