User talk:LOZ: OOT

WP:Oh I say, what are you doing? Come down from there at once! Really, you're making a frightful exhibition of yourself. Where else but Wikipedia? LOZ: OOT

Welcome!

Hello, LOZ: OOT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:

Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

– Luna Santin (talk) 01:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the smile. :-) --CmdrClow 06:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Your Signature

Please fix your signature, part of it links to a user page for LOZ that doesn't exist, the other part goes to a talk page for a user OOT. Thanks, and welcome to Wikipedia! SpigotMap 08:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be working now, glad to help! SpigotMap 08:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments at ANI

Please do not add nonsensical "yeah, this, too" comments to discussions at WP:ANI. It doesn't help anything, and it just makes things more confusing. Please edit articles more.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 19:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

o.o

Mebbe. o_O Oh, and dont forget to sign your edits! :) --CableModem^^ 05:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taking a short Wikibreak

I`ll be back in a day or two. Goodnight! --LOZ: OOT 05:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have returned! LOZ: OOT 21:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi LOZ: OOT, Ryulong has given you good advice above. It's alright to talk to other editors informally, but remember that our purpose here is to write an encyclopedia.Proabivouac 05:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

Here's the Subaru Telescope for you! The Subaru Telescope in whatever kind of way promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! --H irohisat ^Talk 06:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

How may I help you, given your abstract post on my talk page? —Kurykh 02:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take a break from the computer. Rest always helps. —Kurykh 02:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No one in particular. I apologize if that sounded blunt, as I don't have a penchant for descriptive language. —Kurykh 02:41, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would not have been a reminder, but rather a quiz question. —Kurykh 02:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OoT:FA

I'm not a member of it yet, as I'm trying to help clean up the Pokemon Articles. I'm not at all a Pokemon fan but it seems there's only a few editors trying to hold down the fort over there from Vandals. Spigot Map 04:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

I hid the game image, on your page since fair use images cannot be used on userspace, per WP:USER. Miranda 20:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I won't do it again, I swear it. I was afraid I got blocked. Not that I did anything wrong, just an irrational fear. LOZ: OOT 20:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. Just be familiar with the policies on the welcome message. Miranda 20:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I look at WP:ANI to see if I'm mentioned anywhere. I'm useless to Wikipedia and its articles, and I fear that my edits will be mistakenly seen as vandalism. I am afraid that people will block me indef and not believe a word I say. LOZ: OOT 02:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't break the rules, then you won't get reported to WP:ANI. Also, I will watch this page to see if you responded, per my talk page rules (courtesy). If you have any questions regarding anything in general, you can ask on the Wikipedia:Reference desk. More on wikipedia, please see the Wikipedia:Help desk. Cheers. Miranda 11:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, obviously, in case I respond. LOZ: OOT 12:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OoT

Hi. I've got a suggestion for you: if you'd like to improve OoT, then add similar references to the plot, as in Link (The Legend of Zelda)#Video games. That would be great. The Prince of Darkness 18:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, Dark Prince. Will do. But I'll be on and off for the next little while, so I may not quite get down to it right away. LOZ: OOT 02:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, nice catches in some of the fansite type stuff and Original Research on the OoT article. I'll help ya out as soon as I get done with the article I'm writing. Spigot Map 03:04, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done the Story section. LOZ: OOT 02:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just got a whole ton of redirects there. LOZ: OOT 04:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. — Deckill er 02:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing you probably could do is to trim the middle section (about the plot) of the introduction. It's way too long. The Prince of Darkness 21:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One question of no real significance

1) What does being rogue mean?— Preceding unsigned comment added by LOZ: OOT (talk • contribs)

Hi. It means a large man-eating crocodile. However, it got nothing to do w/ someone capable of sneaky combat and nimble tricks. --> Category:Rouge admins. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 11:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know you were into D&D, FayssalF. Back when I did this, the rogue was called a thief.Proabivouac 07:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

;) But i said it got nothing to do w/ D&D! -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 14:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Video game guidelines

Hi! I noticed this edit you made to The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time—Zelda articles are my main interest. WikiProject Video games has a set of article guidelines that might be helpful for you to read. In particular, encyclopedic articles are written for the general reader—do not assume that the reader has played the game, or any game for that matter. Thus, avoid the second person ("you") when writing. For the same reason, specific button references should generally be avoided. For example, instead of "You fight the boss by pushing the A button to attack with your sword", say "Links fights the boss using his sword". Hope this helps. Pagrashtak 17:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Pssst ... you forgot to sign your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dickpussy. I'm getting bored with adding {{Unsigned}} all day :). —Travis ^talk 22:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to White & Nerdy, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cheers, JetLover ^(talk) 00:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I guess I am. Vandals commonly say Wikipedia is nerdy. Cheers, JetLover ^(talk) 00:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's just not appropriate for an article. Cheers, JetLover ^(talk) 00:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply, actually I'm not an admin. I mistook your edit for vandalism, although it was in good faith. Sorry about that, but I just wouldn't put it there. Cheers, JetLover ^(talk) 00:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Hopefully you will become an admin someday. Cheers, JetLover ^(talk) 00:59, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I've been trying that for a long time but with no luck. I think something went wrong in the page move. - Deep Shadow 05:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LOZ:OOT

Nice to see everything is going okay over here…keeping an eye on you if that's alright.
Are you familiar with Premiata Forneria Marconi?Proabivouac 07:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may enjoy Photos of Ghosts and The World Became the World. There are other good ones, but these are the most canonically prog. Re Genesis, Selling England by the Pound and Lamb Lies Down on Broadway are both highly regarded, and you should probably enjoy them a great deal.Proabivouac 01:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Thanks!

No problem. Luna Santin's talk page is on my watchlist, and I saw your question via that. Ksy92003(talk) 19:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe I assumed that. I assumed that her page was on your watchlist because you left the question there... it seemed reasonable :-) Wasn't expecting a response from you about it, but nice to have one, and nice to meet you. Ksy92003(talk) 19:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re:WP:LAME

Indeed. The key is to have as much patience as possible and look at it logically; it'll make the silliness of the opposing argument obvious after a while. — Deckill er 20:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the problem with fiction on Wikipedia is that a lot of people don't take it seriously. That ranges from content to things "deserving" their own article because they are merely significant to the plot. WP:FF (the Tifa situation wasn't really a WP:FF matter) is probably the only true exception, although other WikiProjects have a few editors who understand how to deal with fiction appropriately. — Deckill er 20:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm sure that, given time, you can contribute heavily to featured articles. OOT can be a starting point. — Deckill er 21:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiktionary

I'm afraid I don't know anything about their processes over there. Sorry. Bearcat 06:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. I have no access there whatsoever. -- Longhair\^talk 07:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's get the facts straight.

I assume your a fan of Zelda, and the history shows your involved with the page. I wonder, have you gone to Gamespot? If not, how do you know I was making it up. I'm just trying to add info from a Wii point of view and try to update the review ratings. So when you recently reverted that info, that makes me think that your obsessed with Wikipedia. Here's what I propose, the easy way is for you to check out Gamespot Wii section and tell me I'm wrong about it or the hard way is for you to falsly update this site and hope that a few years later it will be out of date.

In short, you may not have visited Gamespot, but if you did, then I'll forgive you for that. If not, do it then reply to me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnyauau2000 (talk • contribs)

Just curious as to what you're trying to add to the article that got reverted? Spigot Map 17:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I thought to be another user added "Even on the Wii it is also the best, scoring 8.9." Now when I looked at my watchlist, I assumed the contributer was an ex-vandal trying to assist Wikipedia for a change and needed assistance. All I said was when he adds a review or something to that effect, he should verify it. I wasn't trying to offend that user, and I apologize if it did offend him. LOZ: OOT 19:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And the user that added the comment was User:Johnnyauau2000, not The Prince of Darkness. LOZ: OOT 19:46, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem to add anything to the article to me. Spigot Map 21:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How would they feel if the pages look the same basically every week? It looks as if the page is going to stay like that leaving editors thinking "What is missing?" You should keep that as a reminder and hopefully all is forgiven. For now, we will leave the page as it is. Try to look up other sites like Gamespot and see what can be added to make it look better. It's just a suggestion but try it anyway.

Your question to Luna Santin

Okay, I get it. Just keeping an eye out;)Proabivouac 02:14, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LOZ: OOT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't get where all these baseless accusations are coming from. My IP address is shared (24.70.95.203) and I'm aiding Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block; please contact the blocking checkuser admin. Also, you being a sock of Connell66 (talk · contribs) does not appear to be out of the question, based on the contribution patterns. — Sandstein 21:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That'd be stupid, considering the fact that he, along with pretty much everybody on Wikipedia fully endorses the block of this account and the ban of User:Connell66. But let's assume that I have changed. Would the block/ban have lost it's purpose? LOZ: OOT 21:55, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LOZ: OOT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, maybe I am Connell66, but doesn't everybody deserve a second chance? I mean, I haven't trolled or vandalized or anything with any account for about two weeks, at east. The last time I admit to doing it was User:Lord Fauntleroy.

Decline reason:

You have been found to be part of a sockpuppet web or a master. Honestly, what goes beyond even asking for a second chance? You not only have abused multiple accounts; you are still doing it. — Jmlk 1 7 22:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You did get a second chance. I recognized Connell66 immediately when he posted to my user talk about a week and half ago, and said so. He admitted to being Connell66 - something most sockpuppeteers don't do, especially to those who helped ban them to begin with - and promised there would be no more good hand/bad hand actions.05:48, 6 August 2007 Unfortunately, the sockpuppet page shows just that.[1]Proabivouac 22:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I gotta be honest, I thought you'd report me to WP:AN/I. You're not as heartles as other users here, which is why I think you'd make an excellent administrator. LOZ: OOT 22:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're Beneath the bridge?

You're the one who vandalized my talk page numerous times and was blocked indefinitely? ([2], [3], [4], [5]) Why did you do this to me? Ksy92003(talk) 19:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly, I didn't. I don't even understand why I'm being accused of sock puppetry. I came here to assist Wikipedia, not damage it. My IP address is 24.70.95.203, and it's shared. Anybody could have made those accounts. LOZ: OOT 19:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright...

Why did you just send me an e-mail? Ksy92003(talk) 22:47, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For the sake of saying I'm sorry. LOZ: OOT 22:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't seem like you were apologizing to me... it seemed more like you were confessing. Your words: "...all my other accounts, Are now killed for being a clooooown!" It seemed like you were confusing to sockpuppetry. Ksy92003(talk) 22:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've already confessed to sockpuppetry! AGES AGO!!!