Jump to content

Talk:Winston Churchill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jtd00123 (talk | contribs) at 20:20, 9 May 2008. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleWinston Churchill has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 8, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 18, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 4, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 13, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
December 30, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of March 28, 2007.
Current status: Good article

Template:WP1.0 Template:FAOL

Churchill's speech impediment

Several original quotes at my site www.stutterers.org - very convincing that Churchill stuttered. I've added that link to the Churchill section.

Thanks Keith Sharp Toronto May 2, 2008

Keith1952 (talk) 09:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Keith1952 (talkcontribs) 19:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

« The funeral also saw the largest assemblage of statesmen in the world until the 2005 funeral of Pope John Paul II.[172] »

Trouble : the Tito (yougoslavian leader)'s article say exactly the same thing, for 1980 :

« His funeral drew many world statesmen.[19] Based on the number of attending politicians and state delegations, it was the largest statesman funeral in history.[20] » from Tito#Final_years.

Who is true ? 220.135.4.212 (talk) 20:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC) The pope isn't a statesman now is he?--87.210.52.227 (talk) 12:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No criticism section?

Why is it that almost every major politician, from George Bush to Clinton, seems to have a criticism section, but not Churchhill? Aside from the Indian Independence controversy, this article seems to paint him as a saint. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtd00123 (talkcontribs) 20:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]