User talk:Kimchi.sg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kimchi.sg (talk | contribs) at 12:40, 23 May 2008 (→‎Deletion of Relevant Traffic: copy comment from header, reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Click here to leave a new message
Old messages
If your message is not on this page, try looking into these archives, starting from the most recent.
Most recent: 01 Oct 10 0228 UTC


Deleted image

Hi Pegasus! You deleted File:PolakSoieEtLumieres.JPG, on the justification that there was no explanation for its use. I had however explained that it was the cover of a book by Christian Polak to illustrate the work of this author. Do you think another rationale would have been better. Do you have objections if I upload again the image with a better rationale? Regards PHG (talk) 18:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do object - a fair use image of a book cover can only be used for critical commentary on the book itself, not its author. More appropriate in this article would be a free-licensed photo of the author himself. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sidwms comments

There is no "neutral" position on the names of the Living God. One is either for "them" or against "them." Sidwms (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)(this comment added to this page by Lifebaka)[reply]

Replied on their page; thanks for relaying his comment here. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saints of the Underground Speedy

Hi Pegasus. I declined the speedy on that, and was just checking google and tidying it when you deleted it. They do seem notable, and notability was asserted. Admitedly the article was appaling. Just to let you know. Pedro :  Chat  09:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Er, Pegasus Sikukuni which you just deleted very much existed as a person and there was enough context there..... Pedro :  Chat  10:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But notable? Nay. Pegasus «C¦T» 10:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[1] refers? Pedro :  Chat  10:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ye,s he was a person. He fought in a war. For a real country. And? Pegasus «C¦T» 10:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And he was a "powerfull chief" [2] - not just some soldier. If you Google it there's dozens of legit refs. Pedro :  Chat  10:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead and write a new version with the refs. Pegasus «C¦T» 10:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, I'll re-create and stub it for a second. Didn't want to wheel war is all! Pedro :  Chat  10:44, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Bruce

hey pegasus - hang on, okay? i'm simons manager and i WROTE the bio from his website.

how do i fix it then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahmckem (talk • contribs) 01:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We assume the bio is copyrighted since you have made no statement to the contrary on the website. Since the text is copyrighted, we cannot allow you to post it unmodified on Wikipedia, because all Wikipedia article must be licensed under the GFDL. The GFDL allows distribution, modification, and sharing of changes to the text by anyone, for commercial and non-commercial purposes.
Now you have two choices:
  1. If you want to release the text of Simon Bruce's biography under the aforementioned GFDL license, either:
    1. Put a notice on the original page, to inform the world you release the text as GFDL, or
    2. Email permissions-en at wikimedia dot org confirming that you want to release the text of the original page under GFDL license. It is not sufficient to simply give permission to us for using the text.
  2. If you do not want to release the text under GFDL, write a totally different version on this page and ask the folks at deletion review to look over it. Be forewarned that in this case, you must write a version that is substantially different from the original - we will be checking and comparing. If the new version is not substantially different, the page will be deleted.
In either case, the text must satisfy at least one of the criteria for musicians' biographies, and there also must be two or more third-party reliable sources that confirm the criteria(s) have been satisfied. If WP:MUSIC criteria are not satisfied, the page will also be deleted. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you, that's all fine and I can do that. Where do I work on the page in order to resubmit it? I barely had time to add references or 3rd party links of newspaper articles etc because the page was taken down so fast. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahmckem (talk • contribs) 02:14, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here. Make a Deletion review request when done. And remember it needs to be substantially different if you want to keep the copyright on your original. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK DONE! i made a review request. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahmckem (talk • contribs) 03:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting My Fund Raising Instruction page

Aloha Pegasus,

Can you explain in more detail why my page was deleted. The page explained what the processes are in running a successful fund raising event. Nothing in the page referenced a particular organization or endorsed a particular fund raising company. What must I do to revamp the article for it to be approved? Let me know. God Bless. A Hui Hou, Rick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aloharick3 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted after consensus from the discussion in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fund Raising Instructions. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portection of the Salam Yiti Page

Hi Pegasus! You deleted Salam Yiti Page, on the justification that there was spam, multiple creations. I have been trying to understand the logic behind posting an article on Wikipedia about Salam Yiti a project being developed in Oman by Sama Dubai. The text i have depicted is taken from the official website of the project as well as aticles published about the project but still it always been rejected based on serveral reasons one being blant adverstising. I do object the protection of the page and i would appreciate if you could assist in posting the article about the project.

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yousef112 (talk • contribs) 08:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you had not repeatedly inserted the same spam into the Sama Dubai article [3] [4], I might believe you. But now, I don't. For a page to be non-advertising, it should be written according to neutral point of view and cite multiple third-party reliable sources. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Icarus (band)

I'd like to create the article Icarus (band). I realise that various attempts at non-notable artists have been attempted before (deletion log), and that the page has been protected for good reason. However, I believe this Icarus is notable - examples of non-trivial third party reliable sources being found here, here, here and here. The band have released albums on Output Recordings and The Leaf Label, and have a track featured on Late Night Tales: Four Tet. Can the page be unblocked so that I can create the article? Thanks! sparkl!sm hey! 19:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Unprotected. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks man! Article created. sparkl!sm hey! 09:13, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delettion of Carlos Aveline page

I read the reason for the deletion and disagree. Not sure how you determine who is of significance and who is not, but im attempting to document the only 4 brazilian jiu jitsu black belts world champion Mario Sperry ever produced. (may be more, im still researching). Might not mean much to you, but these guys are legends in the jiu jitsu world that have trained with all the greats back in the day. There are 91 other brazilian jiu jitsu black belts list here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Brazilian_Brazilian-Jiu-Jitsu_practitioners, why is this one being singled out for exclusion? What is the objective criteria for making this list? Neutralone (talk) 06:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


"how you determine who is of significance and who is not" - WP:BIO, but I made a mistake in deletion. Pegasus «C¦T» 07:49, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Further question I need help with. Many of these top level black belts that have competed in the World Championships in brazil, are extremely difficult to get references for. Before very recent years, this stuff simply was never documented on the internet by the brazilians. San Diego has a very large population of old BJJ black belts that know the history who have migrated here, they were there, and I would like to document this stuff, but references, especially on the internet, barely exist at all. I know some people believe if you cant google it, it doesnt exist, but that is not the case. Brazil is the home of the top guys, everyone knows who they are and what they did in the community, but they have been terrible in keeping a recorded record anywhere. Any advice on how to get some of this stuff on to wikipedia without immediately being constantly rejected? The only "official like" references may exist on old printed newspapers in some BJJ school somewhere in brazil :( Neutralone (talk) 16:11, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As long as it is a printed source, it can be cited. This includes offline newspapers with no internet version. Pegasus «C¦T» 23:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Articles_for_deletion/Holger_Lagerfeldt

Your opinion is requested: Can we allow anyone who may just merit an article section or at most, an article stub, as a SONGWRITER (in accordance to WP:MUSIC) to post links to his web sites as a producer and mastering engineer, which he doesn't qualify as per WP:Bio? Also, the subject just showed up to defend his article page at its talk page [5], a clear telltale sign that he violated WP:MUSIC (See: WP:MUSIC#cite_note-selfpromo-0.

.If you agree that something is wrong in here, please vote to delete and /or to take away all external links that promote him as an engineer and to reduce the article to a songwriter's stub. Thanks. Jrod2 (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Cullimore

can i request you delete this page (again) and protect it from being created again? according to the logs its been deleted 3 times, and still keeps coming back with the same issues. thanks! Ironholds (talk) 01:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done protected; deletion was by another admin. Pegasus «C¦T» 22:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion Review for Allison Sudradjat

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Allison Sudradjat. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, yes I was too hasty in recreating it and should have gone to DRV in the first place. I am listing it there as all the info on Arbcom etc. suggests the creator was indef blocked rather than banned. Unless I am missing something. Anyway, I did place it back as it had been improved and new sourcing found since the original AfD in May 2007. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commented... if not for the little technicality that is G5, I wouldn't have re-deleted. Pegasus «C¦T» 23:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CDC Games article deletion - please restore

Hello, please restore the CDC Games article. We are in process of creating it and extending the references. CDC Games is notable for several reasons:

CDC Games is a publisher of multiple hit video game titles that have articles in Wikipedia including Yulgang, Lord of the Rings Online, EVE Online, Soldier Force, and Lunia. CDC Games is the first publisher of a major type of online video games in China called free to play which is now the industry standard method of running online games. CDC Games is the first Chinese company to become a global publisher of video games. CDC games has over 140 million customers in China and hundreds of thousands more outside of China who seek informaiton on the company. CDC Games currently runs 3 of the top 10 video games in China.

There are currently dozens of other video game publishers in Wikipedia including Blizzard, Electronic Arts, Nexon (whose article we used to format CDC Games), Atari, etc... CDC Games is a major competitor of all of these companies in China.

Thanks,

ronsemail —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronsemail (talk • contribs) 03:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I would like to see the references you had planned to include, before deciding whether to restore the page. You can list them here. Note that Wikipedia guidelines for company articles allow only references that are from third-party sources, not related to CDC. Pegasus «C¦T» 03:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, there are lots (67,000 google hits when searching for the exact phrase CDC Games) but here is the start: http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0416/p13s02-algn.html http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2007/09/17/story7.html http://www.chinatechnews.com/2008/04/11/6607-cdc-games-launches-new-yulgang-game-version/ http://www.thefreelibrary.com/CDC+Games+Wins+Award+for+Most+Anticipated+Game+of+2007+at+China+Game...-a0157836040 http://www.gamasutra.com/php-bin/news_index.php?story=17934 http://www.chinagamebiz.com/NewsDetail.asp?id=393 http://www.wral.com/business/local_tech_wire/wire/story/1774490/ http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2007/09/04/2908855.htm http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080310/20080310005523.html?.v=1 http://www.chinatechnews.com/2008/03/10/6479-cdc-games-signs-agreement-with-sk-telecom-for-games-in-china/ http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20071112005619&newsLang=en http://www.chinaventurenews.com/50226711/gandalf_and_frodo_going_to_china_cdc_games_says_yes.php http://www.digital50.com/news/items/BW/2001/07/14/20070822005385/cdc-games-launches-cdc-games-international-to-publish-online-games-on-a-global-scale.html http://pc.thegamereviews.com/story-75-CDC-Game-Play-for-Merchandise-Appoints-New-President-.html --Ronsemail (talk) 03:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done restored. please observe neutral point of view when writing; do not insert promotional material. Pegasus «C¦T» 23:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

otto eugene adams

please restore my last version of otto eugene adams --Teda13 (talk) 05:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

03:47, 18 April 2008 Pegasus deleted "Otto Eugene Adams" ‎ (A7 (bio): Real person; doesn't indicate importance/significance)--Teda13 (talk) 04:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Yes... "doesn't indicate importance/significance". No sign of fulfilling any of the biography criteria = No chance of undeletion. Pegasus «C¦T» 05:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Eugene Adams

Just an FYI... The original author has requested a review of the deletion at User talk:Gogo Dodo#otto eugene adams. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SL army flag.JPG

You removed the speedy tag from this image on the grounds that it was in use, and should be replaced by Image:The Sri Lanka Army Flag And Crest.JPG first. This is not the case. The image isn't in use, and the issue is less about it being a copy than it being a blatant copyright infringement. Nitraven, the uploader of the image, didn't like that Image:The Sri Lanka Army Flag And Crest.JPG was removed from Template:Military of Sri Lanka (see history), and uploaded a reduced size version of the image, and claimed he owns copyright. This is a copyright violation. As such, the image needs to be removed under CSD I9. I've added speedy tags to this image again, and hope you see clear to deleting it or allowing another admin to delete it. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kelso Home

Just so you know.. about your edit, the Kelso Home redirect is convenient, but the page is present not as another name for, a pseudonym, a nickname, or a synonym for the Kelso Home for Girls. The Kelso Home organization was not a physical place (like an orphanage)... it was actually an incorporated entity created by Thomas Kelso before his death that existed to benefit the orphans, as coordinated by the Methodist Episcopal Church. The organization ultimately gained national status and was renamed the Methodist Board of Childcare. For an example... there was also the Strawbridge Home for Boys, split off in the '20s, that also got funding from the Kelso Home organization and coordination by the Methodist Church. I am in contact with the Methodist Board of Childcare on some things, but don't really feel I would ever be able to tackle a page for that organization - which would be the current Kelso Home organization.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Teda13 (talk • contribs)

When we can write more about the organisation, we can un-redirect the page. Right now the redirect is just for convenience in the absence of more content. Pegasus «C¦T» 23:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pegasus, You have removed the company logo for the Digital TV Group that I uploaded. I do have permission to upload this logo as we wish to improve the look of the Wikipedia Entry for our organisation. The logo can be verified by going to our website www.dtg.org.uk. I'm not sure what i did incorrectly but I ask that you consider reinstating the logo entry. Many thanks, Simon —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgauntlett (talk • contribs) 20:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded it and declared it was uploaded "for use only with permission from the company". We can't use images with such copyright terms. You might wish to re-upload it if it can be used under the non-free content criteria. In that case, it is necessary to add a template and text that explain how the logo is being used under the criteria. Pegasus «C¦T» 04:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HealthCentral Network deletion

Hi Pegasus. I don't understand why the entire entry for The HealthCentral Network was deleted. This is a fairly straightforward page about this company. Please explain and tell me how we can get our page back up! Thanks, Don —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwmdc (talk • contribs) 14:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was definitely not "fairly straightforward" as far as Wikipedia standards go. It was an advert that was certainly not written according to policy: the article can be re-written if neutral point of view is observed, and citation from reliable sources are given to prove that the company is notable. Pegasus «C¦T» 04:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ducos Du Hauron Image

I am trying to track down where the original of the Ducos du Hauron color photograph is (Image:Duhauron1877.jpg) so I can see it. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcasella (talk • contribs) 20:09, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to find a source for that picture, but there is another version without the frame, Image:Angouleme 1872.jpg. The source for the altered version is [6]. Pegasus «C¦T» 04:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin assistance needed

Hello! finally I found an admin. Can you please take a look at the edit war going on the article Afghanistan, or protect it. Thanks! --SMS Talk 07:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Pegasus «C¦T» 11:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! for the quick response! --SMS Talk 14:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quick note that I've unprotected it - one side of the edit war consisted of sockpuppets of a banned user, which have now been blocked. henrik•talk 19:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Zelenoff

You removed the Charlie Zelenoff article. He's very well known among ALL boxing websites. There's are tonnes of boxer profiles on Wikipedia and yet YOU feel this article should be deleted. You're crazy and a disgrace to Wikipedia.

Charlesbeau (talk) 13:35, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"He's very well known among ALL boxing websites..." If there are citations from reliable sources for your claim, that would make Zelenoff notable and I would consider restoring the article. Are there any citations? Pegasus «C¦T» 02:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Deleting Natali Del Conte Page

Hi I am the person who re-posted the page. I spoke to an admin about why it was removed and found that the reason it was original removed was due to the fact that at that time the person wasn't considered significant.

Since then this person has become a host of CNET and has been used as a tech guest on the Today Show (NBC) and other significant TV programs. So the feeling was that the reason for the original deletion was no longer valid. This was the reason for the re-post of information.

Also I am somewhat confused why this page was ever removed for the person not being significant enough when other pages of far less significant (fictional and real) people exist on Wikipedia. I completely agree with the idea of having rules but feel it is also important to follow them in as a consistent an approach as possible.

So therefore with great respect for the fine work done on this site, I would like to request a review of this judgment if possible.

All the best,


Joe Dawson --BitStop (talk) 17:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since this article was deleted after a consensus reached in a deletion discussion (which you have already read), I am not comfortable with restoring the page by myself. You may ask for a consensus to overturn the original decision at Deletion review. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks... I am new to this so I didn't know. --BitStop (talk) 11:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Paul peek.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Paul peek.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Natali Del Conte

Strangely, the page I posted about this technology reporter has been deleted. No clear explanation has been given for the reason. After opening the page myself, I monitored the content once in a while to be sure it was in accordance to the rules of Wikipedia.

I know this has happened before but nobody informed the creator of the page it was scheduled for deletion, this would seem like a reasonable step to take.

In any case, expect me to read the rules again and enter this page one more time with content considered appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ptousign (talk • contribs) 20:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Silvia Lancome - Silvia Lancom - Silvia Lancoume - Silvia Lancôme - Sylvia L. - Miss Afghanistan.jpg

Please undelete this image. The person who uploaded it, Duvarngreen, is not a banned user. A malicious editor, Nisarkand, (through the use of sockpuppets) has been consistently accusing any user that he disagrees with to be the banned user, Benham. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/NisarKand Vinh1313 (talk) 18:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind the request. I've lost track on who is who in the war between NisarKand and Ben-ham. Vinh1313 (talk) 20:19, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shop5 deletion. I can fix it!

Hi Pegasus,

An article that I created today (Shop5) was immediately deleted. I am quite new to Wikipedia and would love the opportunity to amend the article so that it meets any and all of Wikipedia's standards.

Also, I was completely unaware that the article would be fully deleted (and not just pulled from the live site), so I do not have a copy of the latest version of the content. Would it be possible to have the content returned so that I might work on the article?

Thanks so much for your time.

Haleypoland (talk) 02:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will consider restoring the page if you tell me, right here, a list of what reliable sources you will be including to ensure that this article satisfies our notability guidelines for websites, which requires two or more of such sources. Typical reliable sources are newspaper or magazine reports that discuss the website in detail, and are independent of the website's owner(s). If no reliable sources are given the article will not be restored. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. We have several press sources pending, but nothing that I can reference for a few weeks. Once I have the references, will there be any obstacles to recreating the article? Haleypoland (talk) 18:59, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chelpedo punk

Please read the whole article again, WP is not a blog/primary source and the article has no encyclopedic content (chat-like comments "We now have around 7 full songs. After their first show at our high school Scott our guitarist decided to leave the band because he was not into the whole band thing any more. After Scott left they decided to jamn with our friend Micah and they all just instantly clicked and Micah was in." and notability concerns [7][8] -genere/band mentioned only on youtube, myspace, blogs and forums).{{nocontent}} {{bio}} Iunaw 12:55, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"WP is not a blog/primary source and the article has no encyclopedic content" makes the article eligible for editing, prod, or AfD, but not speedy deletion. Pegasus «C¦T» 12:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can edit and rewrite it as much as you want, it won't be encyclopedic content (perhaps in years, but not yet). Google gives 45 results for "chelpedo", most of them youtube and myspace links, as i said. I'll wait a prudential time before tagging it for speedy again, as it *is* an A7 criteria candidate. There are zillions of bands that experiment with new genres and this one does not indicate why it is important or significant. Iunaw 02:04, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can prod it still... and since "Chelpedo punk is one of the evolutions of anarcho-punk and hardcore punk...", it is a musical genre, not a group. I don't understand why you avoid WP:PROD like the plague, as if adding {{prod}} to the page will give you smallpox and adding {{db-band}} won't. Oh and I watch my deleted contribs so if you think you can inappropriately tag for CSD again you are very, very badly mistaken. Be forewarned. Pegasus «C¦T» 02:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry, i won't tag it after seeing that you still disagree and that you really have interest in this article about a unknown musical genre that has 40 hits on google and the high-school-band that created it.. It's all yours, good luck! Iunaw 22:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OWN SPACE

  1. REDIRECT OWN SPACE is a new term used to denominate a software development environment that is design to increase the brain activities without disturbing. Why was it speed deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablocf (talk • contribs) 14:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you give me even one reliable source that uses this term I might just begin to consider restoring the page. But until then, no. It sounds like a term you made up yourself. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for deleting Image:GambarPosterLaluLintas.jpg and Image:FrogandAPairofGeeseCover.jpg. Ivan Akira (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) Pegasus «C¦T» 01:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted ADVANCE Newsmagazines entry

Pegasus - you deleted my ADVANCE entry without giving me a chance to brig it into compliance or even finish it. I used the "hang on" tag as instructed and I thought that would give me some time to adjust the article. Did you check my rationale for writing the article in the talk section of that entry? I just want to present some factual info about ADVANCE. Can you please tell me how this can be done and be fully compliant? How does an article about the publisher Conde Nast make the cut while ADVANCE does not? Respectfully Rolah (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if my speedy deletion is a mistake it can be rectified just as quickly. The only thing you have to do, before I can consider restoring the page, is to give me two or more articles in reliable sources - independent of ADVANCE - that have discussed the company in detail. This is required according to our notability guidelines for companies. Pegasus «C¦T» 01:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pegasus - thanks for explaining with practical steps. I will be sure to have this info at the ready the next time I upload a new entry. Good luck to you and yours as you travel the highways and biways of life. Rolah (talk) 17:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chase manikas

dude u delteed that page on chase manikas, n it was a birthday present i was making for my friend (chase manikas) whos in the hospital —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmymanikas (talk • contribs) 02:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A cake or a "get-well soon" card is a better way to do what you want. Pegasus «C¦T» 03:48, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons images

I move a lot of images to the Commons, and I normally do tag with db-i8 - the only time I tag with {{db}} is when MetsBot malfunctions on deletion screening due to idiosyncrasies with odd licenses or incorrect/indirect sourcing on the en Wikipedia. That was the case with the images I tagged tonight - three images with the oddball/obsolete {{GFDL 1.2}} license that will likely be deleted shortly. I suppose I could nominate at IfD but it seems kind of silly when the image is clearly a redundant local copy. Kelly hi! 03:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, just a heads-up since you deal with these deletions...I've also been been running into problems with Flickr-sourced images on Commons when it comes to deletion of local copies here. When I run across a Flickr image here on en Wikipedia, I will normally upload it to Commons directly from Flickr using Flickr Upload Bot (as opposed to using CommonsHelper) so that the license is verified, all attribution details are included, and the highest-resolution version is uploaded. MetsBot tends to choke on this type of "duplicate" because the sourcing and resolution are often slightly different from the en copy. I told Mets501 about it, but he hasn't figured it out yet...in the meantime these images have to be nominated for speedy manually. Kelly hi! 04:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brazzers article and Brittany Burke article

1) I saw that my Brazzers article was deleted tonight (after working 3+ hours on it!) It said that it does not have significance, however, Brazzers is on par with Vivid Entertainment, Naughty America, Diabolic Video, Club Jenna, Wicked Pictures as an adult film company, all of which have articles on wikipedia. Additionally, I had started to list the actresses that work for Brazzers, many of which had existing links on here. I do feel that it is a legitimate topic.

2) I completed an article on Brittany Burke (another adult actress) which I think turned out quite well, and would welcome your feedback. I do have a question: How can the title "Brittany Burke" be fixed? (Right now the "b" in Burke is lower case).

Thanks for your help!

waynem37 Wayne T. Montpetit, Jr. Auburn, NY

Waynem37 (talk) 05:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Brazzers, there was no indication of how the company is significant, according to our notability guidelines for companies.
As for Brittany Burke, you added a photo of her but did not say where you got it from. We don't allow photos without source information on Wikipedia, so it will be gone if you don't tell us. Pegasus «C¦T» 12:34, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goku Sons(band)

i was finishing the page "goku sons" before my computer went off. My article was deleted because of no mencion in the importance of the band. is there a way i can see what i had writen before? although it hasn't released any album it has made a tremendous sensation in its live acts.

i am sorry i didn't use the sandbox. i am new in wikipedia and i only read the manuals after the article was deleted (sorry) thanks for spending your time with this— Preceding unsigned comment added by Titovzky (talk • contribs)

 Done Page has been restored to User:Titovzky/Goku sons. You can see the original text on that page. Pegasus «C¦T» 12:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am the creator of Relevant traffic page, my old user name was Relevant Traffic

Hi,I just saw that you have deleted my user name and everything I had created with it. I do understand that the user name was not according to wikipedias guidelines but the article I was writing was, according to what I have read. I also was still working on the article, adding more links. Why do you call my article "blatant advertising" when for example Tele 2 is not, and that was the site I had as my reference. Could you please restore the page, under my new username, so I can keep working on the article to make it publishable please? Many thanks Tesswork, (used to be Relevant Traffic) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tesswork (talk • contribs) 15:15, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done (Detailed reply 3 sections below.) Pegasus «C¦T» 12:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My recent RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA, which unfortunately didn't succeed. The majority of the opposes stated that I needed more experience in the main namespace and Wikipedia namespace and talk space, so that is what I will do. I have made a list and I hope I will be able to get through it. I will go for another RfA in about three month's time and I hope you will be able to support me then as well. If you have any other comments for me or wish to be notified when I go for another RfA, please leave them on my talk page. If you wish to nominate me for my next RfA, please wait until it has been about three months. I will not be checking back to this page so if you would like to comment or reply please use my talk page. Thanks again for participating in my RfA! ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 07:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ojai Music Festival

Pegasus: I did not create the Ojai Music Festival page which you deleted on 23 February 2008, but I made significant changes/amendments to that article, complete with third-party references and quotes from various newspapers, external websites, etc. I'd be happy to recreate the article using acceptable sources, but I don't want to do it from scratch. Is there any way to recover the edits I made or are they gone forever? Westofpch (talk) 02:43, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will restore the page to User:Westofpch/Ojai Music Festival very shortly. Please note that if the page is not cleaned up according to Wikipedia guidelines (such as neutral point of view, notability and spam), it may still be deleted at some point in the future. Pegasus «C¦T» 12:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Relevant Traffic

Hi, I am waiting for an answer from you regarding te deletion of both my user name: Relevant Traffic (which I understand why!) and the content I had created for Relevant Traffic. WOuld you please restore what I had created so I can work on it accoring to Wikipedia rules. Many thanks Tesswork —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tesswork (talk • contribs) 11:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was no assertion of why, or how, this company is significant according to our notability guidelines for companies. In addition the prose appeared to be solely intended to promote the subject, not at all appropriate for Wikipedia. Thus it was deleted.
I will restore the page to User:Tesswork/Relevant Traffic very shortly. However I advise you to write the new article from scratch to make it comply with the neutral point of view policy and the aforementioned notability guidelines. When you are done writing, make a request at deletion review to see if there is consensus to move the page back into the article space. Pegasus «C¦T» 12:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Page restored. Please note that it might be re-deleted at some point in the future if the prose continues to fall short of Wikipedia guidelines. I cannot promise you that the page will be retained indefinitely. Pegasus «C¦T» 12:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

themlink - deletion

Its social networking site like linkedin.

When Wiki has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linkedin why not themlink??

PLs help

regards Anisa— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anisa3k (talk • contribs)

There was no indication of how this company is notable. Pegasus «C¦T» 12:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kimchi.sg&oldid=214408535"