This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
Its views on policy toward the Palestinians has been relatively flexible, thus often allowing it to control the balance of power between Israel's two large parties, Labor and Likud.
A more accurate (but more POV) explanation: Shas have no "policy toward the Palestinians" and therfore can choose which party (and "policy toward the Palestinians") to join. Av.P23:43, 8 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this appears to be a mix up. The party is definitely socially conservative (i.e. for preserving Jewish tradition/religion, anti-gay/secular etc.), but economically speaking it is very left-wing and very much for the welfare state (or at least payments for people in Yeshivas and big child allowances...) --Number 5709:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I have removed the political platform since it contradicts what is on the SHAS website. Futhermore, I have also deleted several paragraphs, since Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu is rather seen as a nemesis of the party and thus supports Mafdal, not SHAS. They arent for Keynesian Economics or Neo-Zionism. Anyone who reverses the changes, it mispresenting the topic.
I believe that the English transliteration of Shas's former Hebrew name is incorrect. It says: "HaTa'akhdut HaSfaradim HaOlamit Shomrei Torah". However, the Hebrew original suggests that the first word is pronounced "Hitakhadut". This would also be grammatically correct since התאחדות הספרדים is obviously a so called smikhut and therefore cannot take two consecutive direct articles.