Jump to content

User talk:A. B.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sorlando (talk | contribs) at 02:13, 17 July 2008 (→‎PWG: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:A._B..



     I will be off-line much of the time and slow to respond to messages until sometime in late June.



Welcome to my talk page. If you leave a message here, I will respond here to avoid fragmenting our discussion.


User:A. B./To do list‎



Tuesday
18
June


A quiz:

Spammers, friends and critics can't agree -- is User:A. B.:

A. "She (because clearly she's a bitch) is just doing her thing up in New Jersey. No one likes you, mother of three. No one." [1][2]
B. "Worst of all this user is very offensive to females." [3]
C. A stalker "from birmgingham england." [5]
D. A "lesbian feminazi."[6][7] … wearing her "undies in a bunch?" [8]
E. A "robot." [9][10]
F. Hiding a pornographic fire-parrot in Wikipedia's sandbox.[11]
G. Living in Minnesota, USA.[12]
H. Canadian, eh? [13] Tamil, no?[14]
I. A Yankee?[15] A Tennesseean?[16] A Yankee and a "Kerry freak"?[17]
J. Just stupid.[18]
K. All of the above.
L. None of the above.
M. Somedays one, somedays another.

You decide.

Answer


Another question:


Who edits Wikipedia?
Answer



Note to self: archived material still needing some follow-up or closer reading

--A. B. (talkcontribs) 16:27, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Independence Day!

As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a Happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway!  :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 21:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and don't forget Canada Day! (July 1). --A. B. (talkcontribs) 02:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 28 7 July 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: Transparency 
Wikimedia releases 2008-2009 Annual Plan Defamation case against Wikimedia dismissed 
WikiWorld: "Charles Lane" News and notes: Adminbots, abuse filter, ArbCom, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes, June 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
To A.B., for protecting "Mesothelioma" from spam. Axl (talk) 23:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much!
I hate to see parasitic spam there when so many people suffer with asbestosis. It's also a honeypot for finding linkspammers in general -- many of the spammers that attack that article have many other domains they're hitting us with elsewhere.
This makes my day -- thanks again. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 23:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SS7

Thanks, my sanity was slowly going with the edit war.... I'm now asking for some consensus on the talk page before I go and add the links back - I'd like to understand what the issues with it were - Leedryburgh appears to have removed a lot of the advertising from his book pages and whats left is small and unobtrusive. To remove the useful (IMHO) link entirely over these two small links would seem a little like throwing the baby out with the bathwater to me - but I'm also equally unattached to his book as I used and own what is probably the main competition (Travis) to his book. I'll see what, if any, consensus is reached over the next few days Beardybloke (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to help. It looked as if too many people were "off their meds". As for the book, it looks useful and it's published by Cisco Press, which is a credible publisher. On the other hand, it's a big no-no to push your own links and site and the transparent use of an IP after I left Leedryburgh a note was a bit galling.
In trying to build consensus, you might try drawing in a wider consensus by posting a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Telecommunications.
Good luck. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 00:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The edit war is continuing here against your requests wiki/Talk:Signaling_System_7 but in a surreal way without me present. Leedryburgh (talk) 10:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PWG

Thanks for the candid assessment of the Park West article. I believe that PWG is as worthy of a place on Wikipedia as any of the other active businesses that currently have articles so I'd like to try and make it truley encyclopedic and remove the promotional elements (and links). As speculated though, I do have a COI - if I can make it truely encyclopedic, how much does this matter? Also, the NYT article and related articles reflect an ongoing competitive struggle along with open/pending cases, all of which I would hope are not appropriate for Wikipedia - please advise. Any advise that can help me make the PWG article a quality, encyclopedic, non-promotional, non-flame-thowing article, and worthy of Wikipedia is appreciated.