User talk:Wynchard Bloom

This is Wynchard Bloom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wynchard_Bloom.

November 2008

Your face is full of "peackock terms" that needs to be reverted. GET A LIFE(which might be hard for you).. if you can't then just go KILL YOURSELF. Stop editing pages only so that you can make it fit with your level of education and understanding. You delete majority of the information you can't understand and your concept of "blogging" is entirely wrong. your identification of "peackock (<- can't even spell) terms" are wrong as well. From the way you write and edit, only shows that you own a "peackock brain" and that you're not qualified to do any editing on Wikipedia. What you do isn't contributing. It's vandalism and on your page, you clearly stated that you're against vandalism and yet you're one of the biggest vandals here on Wikipedia. you're such a hypocritical imbecile. Slemcal1 (talk)

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Bea Alonzo. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bluemask ^(talk) 02:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

from --Geniusdream (talk) 06:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

you are vandalizing the page, Sarah Geronimo, we will tolerate it this time, but the next move, you will be seriously treated and you will be blocked in Wikipedia. --Geniusdream (talk) 06:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Geniusdream

Probably, if he keeps on arguing that his edits were valid or something... Blake Gripling (talk) 10:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From --Geniusdream (talk) 11:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Your edits on the article doesn't have any references, please present me references to prove that your version is better. --Geniusdream (talk) 11:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah and the Genius

Wynchard, please note that Genius is a newbie. Everybody wants to help him, however, they are discouraged at times because of his bizarre do-not-touch-my-work attitude. With cool heads, we can overcome this one. Also, please be civil with your comments. Words such as "bobo", I think its the tagalog one, isn't civil. Hope you don't mind. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 02:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Your face is full of "peackock terms" that needs to be reverted. GET A LIFE(which might be hard for you).. if you can't then just go KILL YOURSELF. Stop editing pages only so that you can make it fit with your level of education and understanding. You delete majority of the information you can't understand and your concept of "blogging" is entirely wrong. your identification of "peackock (<- can't even spell) terms" are wrong as well. From the way you write and edit, only shows that you own a "peackock brain" and that you're not qualified to do any editing on Wikipedia. What you do isn't contributing. It's vandalism and on your page, you clearly stated that you're against vandalism and yet you're one of the biggest vandals here on Wikipedia. you're such a hypocritical imbecile. Slemcal1 (talk)

What an Immature boy. - Wynchard Bloom ^{contact me}_{My work} 10:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Angel in Bukidnon.jpg

I just want to verify if you really took that picture of Ms Locsin in Bukidnon last Sept 15. --bluemask ^(talk) 14:31, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My cousins send me that picture, because they were in Bukidnon, during the shooting of the said movie! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 23:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then, don't use the {{self}} tag. You are violating their copyright, they still own it. Indicate the name of the photographer and ask his/her permission that the image can be released under GFDL or Creative Commons. --bluemask ^(talk) 00:26, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will just put the name of the uploader of the image. Thanks again! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Already changed it! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 02:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With cousin, you mean you are also related to Angel Locsin? (Judging from the uploader's name "Ella Colmenares" which is similar to Locsin's real surname Colmenares.) That would violate Wikipedia's policy on Conflict of Interest. And interestingly, I've once heard of a sockpuppet who claim he/ she is a cousin of Angel Locsin. Could that be you? Starczamora (talk) 14:30, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but im not aware of what ur saying, you better to go to a mental hospital Mr.Starczamora to enlighten ur mind, and yes i am a cousin of Ms.Locsin, but why? are u insecure, u better be cautious to wikipedians man, your so rude. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 01:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's weird. A lot of former socks of Gerard Gonzales rebut arguments by accusing the opponent as "insane" (a sign of immaturity in my opinion). You're being too obvious. (p.s. being a "cousin" of Locsin who edits an article about Locsin violate WP:COI, but you know that by now) Starczamora (talk) 22:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, i have no time to talk with a desperate person like you, If you disrupt me, I'll better report you to admin and stop rvng Angel at maxim party.jpg on the page of locsin. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 02:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lovers in Paris (Philippine TV series)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lovers in Paris (Philippine TV series), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Lovers in Paris (Philippine TV series)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Xeltran (talk) 17:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Locsin GA nomination

Please don't create fake nomination times in an attempt to move your articles further up the list. WP:GAN, as with everything else in Wikipedia, is a volunteer process. Reviewers work hard to make it through the backlog, but sometimes you just need to be patient. Lying about a nomination time and hiding it within an otherwise legitimate edit is unfair to everyone, and as a frequent GA reviewer, I find it offensive. It's a slap in the face to have someone try to cheat everyone else. If you want your article to move further up through the backlog, I encourage you to help review some articles. The instructions can be found at Wikipedia:Good article nominations under "How to review an article", and you can check out the suggestions or seek a GAN mentor if you have any questions. GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I ask apogogize with you about that, Sorry. Wynchard Bloom (talk) 04:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Angel Active.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Angel Active.PNG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Angel Active

I have nominated Angel Active, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Active. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Starczamora (talk) 03:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've posted a comment to your response at the AfD nomination. If you could check it out, and see if you can help provide sources, it would be great! Fraud ^{talk to me} 04:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Slemcal1

Calm down, buddy, OK? We have proper actions to "bizarre behavior". --Efe (talk) 09:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me about that! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 10:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Always welcome. He's been blocked. --Efe (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, but we'll see depending on what he says. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 04:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its up to you. Cheers! Wynchard Bloom ^{contact me}_{My work} 04:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One True Love

Can you stop reverting my edits on One True Love. My edit is more indepth than the edit you keep choosing. I patterned my edits from Revolutionary Road (film), and I know that character "summary" is copy and paste - I've removed that. Thanks. -ISWAK3 (talk) 11:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But your including many word about the MR and DD which is OT. Ill fixed it! Wynchard Bloom (talk) 11:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Dyosa

I see you and User:Arcee jazz365 apparently going back and forth between two quite different versions of Dyosa. This is behaviour that is called an edit war on Wikipedia, and it's considered a Bad Thing.

The recommended way to resolve these things is to go to the talkpage and explain WHY you think the version you're reverting to is the right one to have on Wikipedia. That creates a record that other people can look at and evaluate, or even contribute to and help find ways forward.

Please - talk-talk, not war-war! --Alvestrand (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit

Thanks Wynchard, my service. Thanks also for the post-Rfa support, however, I removed your edit because closed Rfa should not be modified. --Efe (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well sorry but i dont know about it! I only did it because im so proud of you and the excitement. Again, Congratulations! Wynchard Bloom ^{contact me}_{My work} 06:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Wynchard for a kind message. Hope that you can overcome your disputes with other users. Just stay guided by the WikiPolcy and you'll be alright. Drop me a message should you need my assistance. --Efe (talk) 06:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slemcal1, round 2

Please do not do this again. You've been warned previously not to antagonize users, and you're bordering on trolling. Consider this a gentle warning that if you do this again there will be actual consequences. Thank you, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 07:45, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really about that! Anyway, I'll just try to forget him and move on. Thanks again and sorry for dissapointing you. Wynchard Bloom ^{contact me}_{My work} 09:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wynchard Bloom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm requesting to any Admin here to unblock me, I'm not a sock but Sarah blocked me because this user reported to Sarah that I'm a sock which is not true. Please consider my unblock request my dear admin. I swear im not really the sock she's talking about!

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of User:Gerald Gonzalez.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Before any admin responds to the above unblock request, please be aware that this account is the subject of a current checkuser request: [1]. The checkuser has not been complete, but also see this SSP report as well.--Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the checkuser request comes back as stale, inconclusive or negative and a reviewing admin is considering unblocking, please let me know on my talk page before unblocking this account as I believe the behavioural evidence is significant enough on its own to warrant a conclusion of sockpuppetry and I will compile an evidence report for any reviewing admin if necessary. Also note that the "Gerald Gonzalez" account is old and too stale to checkuser and the checkuser request is based on a link I found between Gerald Gonzalez and a prior account that had been checkusered, Aiza00. Aiza00 is also stale but hopefully the checkusers will still have a record of that check. Sarah 03:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wynchard Bloom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I already made almost more than 50 Accounts since I've been literate in Wikipedia in 2007 but Those accounts were all blocked the only reason is I forgot the password of my original account which was blocked for weeks because of edit-war, vandalisms ect. To Admin who blocked me or to any English Wikipedia Admins please give me a chance to edit on Wikipedia. This is my habit, this is almost my life. Lately, I never vandalized any article her, I just only prevents Philippine related articles from vandalisms and you can see it on my contributions. If I just only never forgot my password on my original account, this will not happen. Give me a chance, I'm just only a human being, and I admitedlly sometimes do wrong things. But I'm no longer that person. Please give me a free username here in Wikipedia, I'm not that bad person for you to do these things to me. Even if I'll blocked and blocked me I will always comeback because I Love wikipedia world. Please give me a second chance Admin!

Decline reason:

Your last edit with this account was a complete lie, and you're threatening to use further sock puppets. I can see absolutely no indication you're "no longer that person". Kuru ^talk 04:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Absolutely not. And here's two excellent reasons: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gerald Gonzalez and Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Aiza00. You're a troll, a vandal, a hoaxer, a destructive and disruptive presence who does little but degrade the mainspace, make personal attacks against other editors and waste our time cleaning up after you. Sarah 04:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. And one more thing: Banned means BANNED. The fact that you tested our patience to the point of engaging in edit wars and disruption is enough to give a site ban on you, even if you promise to be good. Blake Gripling (talk) 04:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would encourage you to leave Wikipedia for a few months before asking for another unblock request. At this point, you have clearly exhausted the community's patience; expecting to be unblocked at this point seems rediculous. If you can prove that you are willing to abide by Wikipedia policy by NOT creating any new accounts, and by respecting the terms of your current block, the community may change its mind. It is unlikely to be able to prove this to the community in a few days... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:53, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Wynchard Bloom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To any admin here, please unblock me, I'd never tried anymore to make another accounts. I'm tired of doing those things because my account were only just blocked. Please give me a chance to edit on wikipedia, I really really want to contribute.Please forgive and Im really sorry for making sock puppets. Now I Know the rules, I will not make any accounts anymore. Please unblock me.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=To any admin here, please unblock me, I'd never tried anymore to make another accounts. I'm tired of doing those things because my account were only just blocked. Please give me a chance to edit on wikipedia, I really really want to contribute.Please forgive and Im really sorry for making sock puppets. Now I Know the rules, I will not make any accounts anymore. Please unblock me. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=To any admin here, please unblock me, I'd never tried anymore to make another accounts. I'm tired of doing those things because my account were only just blocked. Please give me a chance to edit on wikipedia, I really really want to contribute.Please forgive and Im really sorry for making sock puppets. Now I Know the rules, I will not make any accounts anymore. Please unblock me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=To any admin here, please unblock me, I'd never tried anymore to make another accounts. I'm tired of doing those things because my account were only just blocked. Please give me a chance to edit on wikipedia, I really really want to contribute.Please forgive and Im really sorry for making sock puppets. Now I Know the rules, I will not make any accounts anymore. Please unblock me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}