World Chess Championship 1972

File:SpasskyFischer1972.jpg

Spassky and Fischer, 1972 match. Before the match, Fischer requested to sit in an "Eames Executive Chair", claiming that it helped him concentrate. Hearing this, Spassky refused to play until organizers gave him one as well.

The World Chess Championship 1972 is a match between challenger Bobby Fischer of the United States and defending champion Boris Spassky of the Soviet Union for the World Chess Championship. The match took place in the Laugardalshöll arena in Reykjavík, Iceland and has been dubbed the Match of the Century. The Soviet Union had dominated the World Championship since 1948. Fischer became the first American official World Champion, ending 26 years of Soviet domination.

The first game started on July 11, 1972. The last game was started on August 31 and adjourned after 40 moves. Spassky resigned the next day without resuming play. Fischer won the match 12½-8½, becoming the eleventh official World Champion.

Background

The match was played during the Cold War, but during a period of increasing détente. The Soviet chess system had long held a monopoly on the game at the highest level. Spassky was the latest in an uninterrupted chain of Soviet World Chess Champions, stretching back to the 1948 championship. Fischer, the 29-year-old eccentric American, was a vocal critic of the Soviet chess system. For instance, he believed that USSR players gained an unfair advantage by agreeing to short draws among themselves in tournaments. Endowed with a fighting spirit, Fischer rarely accepted agreed draws in unclear positions. The expectations on Spassky were enormous because for the Soviets, chess was part of the political system. While Fischer was often famously critical of his home country ("Americans want to plunk in front of a TV and don't want to open a book..."), he too carried the burden of expectation because of the political significance of the match.

Fischer failed to arrive in Iceland for the opening ceremony. For the next several days, it looked doubtful that the match would be played at all, for it was proving impossible for FIDE to accommodate Fischer's myriad demands, such as banning television cameras and a 30 percent share of the revenue from spectators. Fischer's behavior was full of self-contradictions, as it had been throughout his chess career. Finally, after a surprise doubling of the prize fund and much persuasion, including a phone call from Henry Kissinger, Fischer did fly to Iceland. Many commentators, particularly from the USSR, have suggested that all this (and his continuing demands and unreasonableness) was part of Fischer's plan to "psych out" Spassky. Fischer's supporters say that winning the World Championship was the mission of his life, that he simply wanted the setting to be perfect for it when he took the stage, and that his behavior was not different from what it had been in the past ten or fifteen years.

Spassky's seconds for the match were Efim Geller, Nikolai Krogius and Iivo Nei. Fischer's second was William Lombardy. His entourage also consisted of lawyer Paul Marshall, whose role in the events of the following months would not be insignificant, and USCF representative Fred Cramer. The match referee was Lothar Schmid.

Before the match, Fischer had played five games against Spassky, with two draws and Spassky winning the other three. However, in the Candidates matches en route to becoming the challenger, Fischer had demolished such stalwarts as Mark Taimanov and Bent Larsen 6-0 (with no draws), and had won four games in a row in his match against former world champion Tigran Petrosian. He was, therefore, considered the pre-match favorite. But many top Grandmasters noted at the time that Fischer had never won a game from Spassky.

World-class match play (i.e., a series of games between the same two opponents) often involves one or both players preparing one or two openings very deeply, and playing them often during the match. Preparation for such a match also usually involves analysis of those opening lines known to be played by the upcoming opponent. Fischer surprised Spassky by never repeating an opening line throughout the match, and often playing opening lines that he had never played before in his chess career. During the last half of the match, Spassky abandoned his prepared lines and attempted to outplay Fischer in lines that presumably neither of them had prepared, but this also proved fruitless for the defending champion.

Quarterfinals

Semifinals

Final

Bobby Fischer United States

6

Mark Taimanov Soviet Union

0

Fischer

6

Larsen

0

Bent Larsen Denmark

5½

Wolfgang Uhlmann East Germany

3½

Fischer

6½

Petrosian

2½

Viktor Korchnoi Soviet Union

5½

Efim Geller Soviet Union

2½

Korchnoi

4½

Petrosian

5½

Tigran Petrosian Soviet Union

4

Robert Hübner Germany

3 (forfeit)

The match

The match was played as the best of 24 games, with wins counting 1 point and draws counting ½ point. If the match ended in a 12–12 tie, the defending champion (Spassky) would retain the title. The first time control was 40 moves in 2½ hours. Three games per week were scheduled but each player could twice ask for a postponement. Games were scheduled to start on Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday. If a game was adjourned, it was to be continued the next day. Saturday was a rest day.

World Chess Championship Match 1972

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20	21	Points
Boris Spassky (USSR)	1	1	0	½	0	0	½	0	½	0	1	½	0	½	½	½	½	½	½	½	0	8½
Bobby Fischer (USA)	0	-	1	½	1	1	½	1	½	1	0	½	1	½	½	½	½	½	½	½	1	12½

Fischer's disastrous start, games 1 and 2

Spassky-Fischer, game 1

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Fischer played 29...Bxh2?

In game 1, after regular exchanges in a placid Nimzo-Indian Defence, the position in the diagram was reached after 29. b5. The position appeared to be a dead-drawn ending, and no one would have been remotely surprised if the players had agreed to a draw here.

Remarkably, Fischer blundered with 29... Bxh2?, a move that few players above the level of rank beginner would have played in light of the obvious 30.g3, trapping the bishop. According to Garry Kasparov, Fischer probably planned 30...h5 31.Ke2 h4 32.Kf3 h3 33. Kg4 Bg1, but overlooked that 34. Kxh3 Bxf2 keeps the bishop trapped. Svetozar Gligorić reports that Fischer made the move very quickly and thinks that he simply overlooked the intermediate move 35. Bd2, which prevents the black bishop from escaping via the e1 square. Anatoly Karpov suggested that Spassky was afraid of Fischer and wanted to show that he could draw with the white pieces and that Fischer wanted to disprove that as the game headed for a stale draw. Due to unusual features in the position, Fischer had good drawing chances despite only having only two pawns for the bishop (see chess piece relative value). However, the position became hopeless after he made at least one more bad move before the adjournment, which was done after move 40. Fischer could still have drawn the game by the correct 39th or 40th move. He resigned on move 56.

Following his loss Fischer made further demands on the organizers, including demands that all cameras be removed. When his demands were not met, he refused to appear for game two, giving a default win to Spassky. His appeal was rejected. Karpov speculates that this forfeited game was actually a master stroke on Fischer's part, a move designed specifically to upset Spassky's equanimity.

With the score now 2-0 in favor of Spassky, most observers believed that the match was over and Fischer would leave Iceland. He did not, a decision that some attribute to another phone call from Henry Kissinger and a deluge of telegrams in his support. Due to his sporting spirit and respect and sympathy for Fischer, Spassky agreed to play the third game in a small room backstage, out of sight of the spectators. Pál Benkő has called this a psychological blunder by Spassky.

The turning point, games 3 to 5

File:SpasskyFisher1972b.jpg

Spassky and Fischer, 1972

Spassky-Fischer, game 3

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Fischer played 11... Nh5!

In Lombardy's words:

When Bobby arrived, Boris was, as usual, seated at the table. Bobby did not sit down but went around inspecting the television equipment, and at this point Boris betrayed indignant agitation. Bobby tested the remote-control camera for possible sources of noise. Schmid watched the proceedings and became anxious. He felt the match once more was in jeopardy. Schmid took Bobby by the arm in an effort to get him to the playing table. Bobby brushed off Schmid's entreaties. "The American grandmaster permitted himself great liberty in his remarks, which were very disagreeable to hear," Spassky said later. Finally satisfied with the camera, Bobby settled down for the match.

It would be the turning point of the match.

After (Spassky with White) 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 c5 4. d5 exd5 5. cxd5 d6 6. Nc3 g6 (Benoni Defense, ECO code A61) 7. Nd2 Nbd7 8. e4 Bg7 9. Be2 O-O 10. O-O Re8 11. Qc2, Fischer demonstrated his acute intuitive feel for the position with 11... Nh5! Allowing White to shatter Black's kingside pawn structure looks antipositional, but Fischer's assessment that his kingside attack created significant counterplay was correct.

Spassky continued in the passive style that he had employed in game 1. He lost after

12. Bxh5 gxh5 13. Nc4 Ne5 14. Ne3 Qh4 15. Bd2 Ng4 16. Nxg4 hxg4 17. Bf4 Qf6 18. g3 Bd7 19. a4 b6 20. Rfe1 a6 21. Re2 b5 22. Rae1 Qg6 23. b3 Re7 24. Qd3 Rb8 25. axb5 axb5 26. b4 c4 27. Qd2 Rbe8 28. Re3 h5 29. R3e2 Kh7 30. Re3 Kg8 31. R3e2 Bxc3 32. Qxc3 Rxe4 33. Rxe4 Rxe4 34. Rxe4 Qxe4 35. Bh6 Qg6 36. Bc1 Qb1 37. Kf1 Bf5 38. Ke2 Qe4+ 39. Qe3 Qc2+ 40. Qd2 Qb3 41. Qd4 Bd3+ 0-1.

Spassky-Fischer, game 5

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Spassky played 27. Qc2??

In the fourth game, Spassky employed the Sicilian Defence as Black. He sacrificed a pawn in the opening and backed by some impressive home analysis, gained a strong attack, but failed to convert it into a win. The game ended in a draw.

The fifth game was another Nimzo-Indian, and Spassky continued his passive style of play. After some aimless play, he faced the position in the diagram on the right. Perhaps his game was lost anyway, but he gifted it to Fischer on a platter with 27. Qc2?? Bxa4 0-1 (e.g., 28. Qd2 (or 28. Qb1; not 28. Qxa4 Qxe4 and mates) Bxd1 29. Qxd1 Qxe4 30. Qd2 a4).

Fischer had drawn level (the score was now 2½ to 2½), and although FIDE rules stipulated that the champion retained the title if the match ended in a tie (after 24 games), the effect of the first two games had been wiped out.

The juggernaut continues, games 6 through 13

Fischer-Spassky, game 6

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Fischer played 38. Rxf6!

In the sixth game, Fischer opened with 1. c4, one of the very rare instances he has not opened with 1.e4, nullifying Spassky's extensive opening preparation. Once again, Spassky played passively. After 1. c4 e6 2. Nf3 d5 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 Be7 5. Bg5 O-O 6. e3 h6 7. Bh4 b6 8. cxd5 Nxd5 (Queen's Gambit Declined, Tartakower Variation D59) 9. Bxe7 Qxe7 10. Nxd5 exd5 11. Rc1 Be6 12. Qa4 c5 13. Qa3 Rc8 14. Bb5?! a6?! (Efim Geller had already discovered 14...Qb7!, but Spassky, according to Geller, had forgotten the move) 15. dxc5 bxc5 16. O-O Ra7 17. Be2 Nd7 18. Nd4 Qf8 19. Nxe6 fxe6 20. e4 d4 21. f4 Qe7 22. e5 Rb8 23. Bc4 Kh8 24. Qh3 Nf8 25. b3 a5 26. f5, White had a crushing attack.

The game continued 26... exf5 27. Rxf5 Nh7 28. Rcf1 Qd8 29. Qg3 Re7 30. h4 Rbb7 31. e6 Rbc7 32. Qe5 Qe8 33. a4 Qd8 34. R1f2 Qe8 35. R2f3 Qd8 36. Bd3 Qe8 37. Qe4 Nf6 (diagram) 38. Rxf6 gxf6 39. Rxf6 Kg8 40. Bc4 Kh8 41. Qf4 1-0

After this game, Spassky joined the audience in applauding Fischer's win. He would later refer to this game as the best of the match.

Game 7 was drawn, despite Fischer being two pawns ahead. In game 8, Fischer again played 1. c4, this time an English opening. Spassky gave up an exchange for little compensation, and it is unclear whether it was a sacrifice or a blunder. Fischer won, and he was ahead 5-3.

Game 9 was delayed when Spassky took time off (pleading illness). The ninth game ended in a draw in only 29 moves. The players' behavior, however, provided for much entertainment, with Fischer rocking back and forth in his chair and Spassky imitating him, which one spectator described as "two dead men dancing". At this point the Soviet establishment asked Spassky to return to Moscow and claim the match by default. At considerable risk, Spassky refused. Fischer won the tenth game, in a sharp Ruy Lopez opening, a favorite of his. Spassky won the eleventh game with an opening novelty in the Poisoned Pawn variation of the Sicilian Najdorf. The twelfth game was drawn.

Spassky-Fischer, game 13

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Position after 61. Bf8

The thirteenth game swung one way, then another, and was finally adjourned with Fischer having an edge in a sharp position but no clear win. The Soviet team's analysis convinced them that the position was clearly drawn. Fischer stayed up until 8 am the following morning analyzing it (the resumption being at 2.30 pm). He had not found a win either. Amazingly, he managed to set traps for Spassky, who fell into them and lost. Spassky's seconds were stunned, and Spassky himself refused to leave the board for a long time after the game was over, unable to believe the result.

Former World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik said that in the history of chess, this game made a particularly strong impression on him. He called it "the highest creative achievement of Fischer". He resolved a drawish opposite-colored bishops endgame by sacrificing his bishop and "stalemating" his rook. "Then five passed pawns struggled with the white rook. Nothing similar had been seen before in chess".

David Bronstein said "Of all the games from the match, the 13th appeals to me most of all. When I play through the game I still cannot grasp the innermost motive behind this or that plan or even individual move. Like an enigma, it still teases my imagination."

Spassky-Fischer 1. e4 Nf6 2. e5 Nd5 3. d4 d6 4. Nf3 (Alekhine's Defence, Modern Variation, B04) g6 5. Bc4 Nb6 6. Bb3 Bg7 7. Nbd2 O-O 8. h3 a5 9. a4 dxe5 10. dxe5 Na6 11. O-O Nc5 12. Qe2 Qe8 13. Ne4 Nbxa4 14. Bxa4 Nxa4 15. Re1 Nb6 16. Bd2 a4 17. Bg5 h6 18. Bh4 Bf5 19. g4 Be6 20. Nd4 Bc4 21. Qd2 Qd7 22. Rad1 Rfd8 23. f4 Bd5 24. Nc5 Qc8 25. Qc3 e6 26. Kh2 Nd7 27. Nd3 c5 28. Nb5 Qc6 29. Nd6 Qxd6 30. exd6 Bxc3 31. bxc3 f6 32. g5 hxg5 33. fxg5 f5 34. Bg3 Kf7 35. Ne5+ Nxe5 36. Bxe5 b5 37. Rf1 Rh8 38. Bf6 a3 39. Rf4 a2 40. c4 Bxc4 41. d7 Bd5 42. Kg3 Ra3+ 43. c3 Rha8 44. Rh4 e5 45. Rh7+ Ke6 46. Re7+ Kd6 47. Rxe5 Rxc3+ 48. Kf2 Rc2+ 49. Ke1 Kxd7 50. Rexd5+ Kc6 51. Rd6+ Kb7 52. Rd7+ Ka6 53. R7d2 Rxd2 54. Kxd2 b4 55. h4 Kb5 56. h5 c4 57. Ra1 gxh5 58. g6 h4 59. g7 h3 60. Be7 Rg8 61. Bf8 (diagram) h2 62. Kc2 Kc6 63. Rd1 b3+ 64. Kc3 h1=Q 65. Rxh1 Kd5 66. Kb2 f4 67. Rd1+ Ke4 68. Rc1 Kd3 69. Rd1+ Ke2 70. Rc1 f3 71. Bc5 Rxg7 72. Rxc4 Rd7 73. Re4+ Kf1 74. Bd4 f2 0-1

Spassky used 4 hours and 50 minutes, Fischer used 4 hours and 15 minutes.

When Spassky and Fischer shook hands, many the audience thought that they had agreed to a draw, thinking that 75. Rf4 draws. But 75... Rxd4! 76. Rxd4 Ke2 wins and 75. Be5 Rd1 76. Kxb3 Re1 also wins for Black.

Ending, games 14 through 21

The next seven games (14 through 20) were drawn. Fischer, with a three point lead, was content to inch towards the title, and Spassky seemed resigned to his fate. The off-the-board antics continued to be as interesting as they ever were, and included a lawsuit against Fischer for damages by Chester Fox, who had filming rights to the match (Fischer had objected to what he said were noticeable camera noises, and the Icelandic hosts had reluctantly – they were to share in film revenues along with the two contestants – removed the television cameras), a Fischer demand to remove the first seven rows of spectators (eventually, three rows were cleared), and Soviet claims that Fischer was using electronic and chemical devices to 'control' Spassky, resulting in an Icelandic police sweep of the hall.

Fischer-Spassky, game 20

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Final position

In the fourteenth through twentieth game, Fischer was unable to get the initiative. Spassky was choosing lines that Fischer was unable to break. The seventeenth and eighteenth games were draws by the threefold repetition rule, which was unusual in that time period. In addition, Fischer made an incorrect claim under the rule in game twenty. The claim was incorrect but the game was drawn.

In the twentieth game, Fischer was unable to make progress and Spassky got a better position. Fischer headed for a drawish endgame but Spassky twice avoided a draw by threefold repetition. The game ended when Fischer made an incorrect claim of a draw by threefold repetition, see threefold repetition#Fischer vs. Spassky.

Spassky-Fischer, game 21

	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h
8									8
7									7
6									6
5									5
4									4
3									3
2									2
1									1
	a	b	c	d	e	f	g	h

Final position, after 41. Bd7?

The 21st game turned out to be the final game of the match. Spassky played badly in the endgame and the game was adjourned with a big advantage for Fischer. Fischer's 40th move was not the best, he should have played 40...Kg4! before ...h5 (his actual 40th move). However, Spassky made the sealed move 41. Bd7?, and any move other than 41. Kh3 allows Black to recover from the out-of-order moves and win. Spassky resigned the game by telephone. Fischer at first refused to accept the legality of this ("get it in writing"), preferring the traditional signing of the scoresheet, but he ultimately acquiesced.

The final score was 12½ - 8½ in favor of Fischer and he beacame the eleventh World Champion.

References

• C. H. O'D. Alexander (1972). Fischer v. Spassky. Vintage. ISBN 0-394-71830-5.
• Pal Benko and Burt Hochberg, Winning with Chess Psychology, McKay Chess Library
• David Edmonds and John Eidinow, Bobby Fischer goes to War: How the Soviets Lost the Most Extraordinary Chess Match of All Time, Ecco, 2004, ISBN 0-06-051024-2
• Larry Evans and Ken Smith (1973). Chess World Championship 1972: Fischer vs. Spassky. Simon & Schuster ISBN 0-671-21546-9.
• Svetozar Gligorić, Fischer vs. Spassky - The Chess Match of the Century, Simon and Schuster, 1972, ISBN 978-0671213978
• Karpov, Anatoly (1990), Karpov on Karpov: Memoirs of a chess world champion, Liberty Publishing, ISBN 0-689-12060-5
• Kasparov, Garry (2004), My Great Predecessors, part IV, Everyman Chess, ISBN 1-85744-395-0
• William Lombardy The Fischer story - A mystery wrapped in an enigma

• Plisetsky, Dimitry; Voronkov, Sergey (2005), Russians versus Fischer, Everyman Chess, ISBN 1-85744-380-2
• Soltis, Andy (2003), Bobby Fischer Rediscovered, Batsford, ISBN 978-0-7134-8846-3

Further reading

• George Steiner (1973). The Sporting Scene: White Knights of Reykjavik. Faber and Faber ISBN 0-571-10362-6

External links

• Match games in PGN format, and a javascript interface
• Match games available with a pgn chessviewer on internet on the chessgames.com website
• Brief comments by Bobby Fischer on the upcoming 1972 Match Video Clip

• Fischer vs Spassky Documentary BBC Documentary

• Spassky vs Fischer 1972, Video Clips with expert commentary: Game 3, Game 5, Game 6, Game 8, Game 10, Game 11, Game 13