Talk:Salman the Persian

Complete rewrite!

I rewrote the whole thing with more information and material. It is not in need of cleaning up now. Please don't revert the article, as I have corrected much of the text. Make improvements only. --Eric 12:14, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

Untitled Comment

Let me add something here that I read 25 years ago and have read over and over. Salman himself knew whats going on when he scaped from the zorasts. He used to write everything mohammed said to him, but often he tested the prophet by asking about the last lines he said. Most of teh time, Mohammed could not even remember what he said or said completely irrelevant things. this clearly proves that Mohammed was faking the whole thing. There was nothing intelligent about what he said except all the things salman added himself in Quran from the knowledge he had from zorastrianism. He was not an arab, he was a Parsi, a Zorasts, a person who believed in human rights. All Islam has is a slight reflection of the knowledge taken from Zorastrianism written by Salman's books. Yet they burnt all Salman's evidences, books, notes, ... If he was a muslim, why was it that non of the persians or Parsi speakings were counted as human beings unless they became muslim, and even then they were second class muslims. They had to become muslims or otherwise they would face death. I suggest to all the people that even if your muslim or think you are, think twice, cause hypocrasy is the biggest sin in islam, the biggest sin commited by your own fake Prophet Mohammed who banned adoption, yet married his son's wife who was 13 years old. Did you see mohammed hear all the things he said in islam, all the "good" things he did, did you see the angles whisper stuff into mohammed's ear, no, cause you werent there. So believeing this islam thing is not easy, only easy for hypocrits and non educated ones. [[ Ketabe Salmane Parsi,written by Sasan Noori, published by Sherkate Haghayegh 1813, library of Balkh Khorasan, ch 11]]

I read in a book 25 years ago that salam often tested the prophet for credibility by asking him about the revayat (the Sora that came from god to mohammed's ear) only hours after mohammed had mentioned them. All the times, the prophet could not remember what the last "SORE" was. Therefore Salman wrote alot of things that he believed as a zorasts in Quran. This proves that Mohamemd was faking the whole thing. I have lots of books in farsi/parsi that proves this fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Motlagh (talk • contribs) 19:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

You need to cite sources. Ogress _smash! 19:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

What he states is a conspiracy theory and not supported by academic sources. I think he needs to familiarize himsef with WP:OR.--Nepaheshgar (talk) 22:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Untitled Comments

I just wanted to let yo know that the information on Salman Fars is Fradulent on wikipedia. I have original proof written in Farsi/Tajiki about his biography. I had already edited the page, but yout took off my edit. I really do not think its fair. The book i have is not in english but is very old. I demand that the correct information about him being processed. See my firend, Salman was a zorastrian, he scaped from his temple in balkh. Then he went to Saudi Arabia, He knew Arabic, So he became a translator there. Think about it. Who better than him to translate a religion to persian, where the persians trusted him so much. I want youto think about it, Mohammed was smart, now if you were mohammed and you wanted to promote your religion, wouldnt you need a translator and a translator with a previous knowledge of a background religion (zorast) with lots of scientific support from it. yeah you would. now what hurts is that all of us got killed, tortured, and mass murdered by islam, and now we can even face the truth. Salman knew the weakpoints of zorasts, think about it, deeply. Peace was our weakpoint, peace. ask anyone who is 50 years of age or older from afghanistan of iran, they know, cause they read the correct history backhome. the problem is that these books were burnt, all our books so that the truth doesnt come out. Thank yo very much for yout consideration (Motlagh (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Motlagh (talk • contribs) 14:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Salman Rushdie's TSV

Does not mention Salman Rushdie's reference and character of the 'Satanic Verses'(thought maybe it should).--207.249.136.254 (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)