User talk:BokicaK

Welcome

Hello, BokicaK, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dick Clark 14:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Many Dream Journeys of Meme

It doesn't read very well and it is difficult to understand what the article is describing. Also, no reliable sources are reference nor are any real-world relevance and context given. While the latter two are common among other anime articles, we like to avoid repeating these mistakes with the newer articles. --Farix (Talk) 14:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegro

So not even you live in Montenegro, huh. ;) I think Wikipedia is the only place with 50 Montenegrin Wikipedians (or several naughty ones and a lot of sockpuppets), among whom only one lives in Montenegro. :D --PaxEquilibrium 22:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Novi Sad

Nisam stigao ranije da ti odgovorim na poruku. Trenutno nemam vremena da prevodim te članke na engleski, ali ako nađem vremena videću da li mogu nešto prevesti. PANONIAN (talk) 21:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa CG

"Možeš li da nacrtaš novu mapu podele Crne Gore po nahijama"

Pa sad, sa tehničke strane gledano mogu, ali mislim da trenutno nemam dovoljno slobodnog vremena da to uradim jer treba malo više rada na toj mapi. Ako nađem vremena nacrtaću tu mapu, ali ništa ne obećavam. PANONIAN 12:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tenis

Pa rado bi se prihvatio tog posla, ali ja nemam vremena da se obavezujem na nista po netu. I ovo što uradim je random. Ja sam inače jako loš u organizaciji vremena, pa sam pogub skoro uvek. Mada mogu doći na portal, stavio sam ga u bookmark, da nešto napišem, ubacim i sl... ali ne mogu da obećam neku stalnu aktivnost na portalu :) --Göran Smith 19:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for BokicaK: 17% for major edits and 14% for minor edits. Based on the last 115 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 11:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

Hello. There's a discussion and vote going on at Talk:Kosovo#Kosovo:_terminology as to whether or not it's better to use Kosovo rather than Kosovan or Kosovar in the Wikipedia articles. You've contributed to Balkans articles in the past and I thought you might have an interest. Cheers. 16:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, BokicaK! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 17:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

slike

Imam problema sa obradom one .svg mape. U ilustratoru su se skroz promenile boje i zadebljale granice iako nista nisam dirao. Svejedno sam postavio taj fajl gde je Kirgistan protiv.

I ovde treba da se postavi slika odozgo 2008_unrest_in_Serbia sa skupa gde se vidi koliko je ljudi bilo ali ja nemam moju a sve novinske su isuvise male da bih nalepio tag da sam ih ja slikao (sto sam primetio da neki rade). Ako uspes da nadjes molim te postavi --Avala (talk) 13:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tuđman request move

Hi

Can you help me with this discussion? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Franjo_Tu%C4%91man#Discussion

--Anto (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diacritics-arbitration

Hi

I intend to send this argument about spelling the south Slavic names (Franjo Tuđman ,Novak Đoković etc. ) here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration

It seemss it's the only solution! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aradic-en (talk • contribs) 21:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tuzla_column.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tuzla_column.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Miljevci Plateau

The guy was a Serb paramilitary(Chetnik).it should be mentioned.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 08:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be mentioned because Chetnik paramilitaries were responsible for almost every crime in the Balkans. In ww2 there was a difference in killing of a Wehrmacht soldier and a SS troop.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 09:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because he was a paramilitary who was caught during the Free Miljevci Operation.Because in the nearby area serb paramilitaries were responsible for the Lovas massacre and the Skabrnja massacre.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 11:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you assume that?I never said it was OK.But in WW2 numerous SS troops were executed who weren't directly involved in crimes. And it is always stated wether the person was a Wehrmacht soldier or a SS troop.

Personaly i think that killing of SS bastards was OK.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was in reaction when arguing with some serb ultrannationalists on Srebrenica Genocide article.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 12:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Tuzla_column.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tuzla_column.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 06:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Imena tenisera

Ima li šanse da se nešto pokrene? Već su mi se javili ljudi koji su zainteresovani za promenom. Slabo poznajem ovdašnju situaciju po pitanju pokretanja glasanja. --Pockey (talk) 13:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On green lights

Saw your comment at Pokrajac's talk page. All I did was revert bad moves - the names were correct, they'd been there for over 2 years without a single complaint on their talk pages, and there hadn't been sufficient discussion. While I will strongly advocate keeping diacritics as an editor, I'm not in charge of anything here, just another admin, and my action shouldn't be seen as a green light for any other (unless it's in fact a continuation of the same action, i.e. resetting back any I somehow missed). Anything else requires consensus and I wouldn't suggest using the current debate as a means to achieve any other renames which may be controversial. Indeed, it was the precise non-controversiality of these ones that allowed me to act. Orderinchaos 13:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in full agreement with you. My own position is pretty much what is contained in the proposal at User:Iricigor/UE. I was just urging caution with regard to seeing my corrective action as a green light for anything. Orderinchaos 16:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hu:Magyar–török háború (1521–26)

Szervusz! Ezt a cikket készülök a magyar wikipédián kiemelté tenni. Ehhez kapcsolódóan van sok csata ami a mostani Szerbia és Horvátország területén zajlott. Próbáltam kapcsolatba lépni a délszláv wikiken szerkesztőkkel, hátha tudnak forrásokat keresni és nekem közölni, de nem kaptam segítséget. Te tudnál segíteni? Doncsecz (talk) 11:59, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was bewilder the category, that Hungarian Wikipedians. Awfully sorry! Doncsecz (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to amend WP:UE

I just made a draft of a proposal to amend WP:UE to avoid "reliable source" misuse. Take a look and tell me what do you think. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 23:33, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bombing of Belgrade in World War II

Can you give a rationale for the split that you proposed for Bombing of Belgrade in World War II. Reply at Talk:Bombing of Belgrade in World War II. Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stole Aranđelović

Hi. Thanks for helping with the correct name of this actor and adding to his filmography. I see you come from Yugoslavia and work on the Serbian wiki. Is it correct to categorize this actor as a Serbian actor (instead of a Yugoslavian actor)? Thanks. Lugnuts (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. Lugnuts (talk) 08:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Albert_dock_at_night.jpg (see my question on the Help desk

You uploaded this image last summer, but it appears to be a copy from an earlier image uploaded in April. Did you migrate this to the Commons and forget to change the authors name in the template? -Mgm|^(talk) 12:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else figured it out. Just make sure you change the author name when you make such a move. :) _ Mgm|^(talk) 14:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Montenegro

Out of the blue, I'd say 1296 - Mulutin's edict to the Saint Vranjina monastery (Lake Skadar).

However, the online mixup (if your result is googling) might be the old website of the Montenegrin government ( http://www.montenegro.yu/podaci/geografija.htm ). And thus, loads of others called upon this and took it over. Remember also, that Milutin was an Uros as well - this might be significant to the problematic.

I promise I'll respond to you tonight, I shall contact my sources and try to get a hold of some big and old books by then.

As for the latter, yeah, I have most of them. Why? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything POV, but to tell the full truth, I haven't seen much of the article myself really (didn't have the time for it).

However, I do think that the article should really use 3-4 more references (for the long historical part), to be a featured article. I, perhaps, might be able to help you with that, also... --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 08:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't agree more, but Wikipedia is such - it requires that such a long section should have a corresponding number of references at least. Search for the things that are not a part of common knowledge about Montenegro (for anyone who possesses decent knowlege).

Oh, and I did that which you asked me back then, in case you missed. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 10:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pomoć!

Molim te, obrati pažnju na par članaka takođe!

To su:

Ulpiana, Pančić's Peak‎, Šarplaninac‎, Đeravica‎, Šar Mountains‎, i naravno manastiri... Šarplaninac pogotovu, ubacuje neki citat koji nije uopšte relevantan za ovaj članak, ne zna se šta navodi...

Ne znam kome još da se obratim, ali vidi, zamolio bih za watch, imam užasnih problema sa tim jednim idiotom, baš neću da mu popustim! User:Illyriandescendant... Hvala puno, unapred!!

Tadija (talk) 22:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

pomoć

Bojane, molim te reci neku lepu reč za ovu promenu...

Talk:Tromegja,_peak

Hvala, pozz, Tadija (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stjepan Filipović

Rado bih pomogao jer sam čuo za Filipovića (iako moja generacija to više nije učila u školi), no izgleda da se taj IP neće smiriti dok mu ne nađemo neke izvore o Filipoviću. S time ustvari imam problema. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 16:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To je bar lako: ako započne edit war, revertati ćemo ga pa prijaviti na WP:ANI/3RR. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 17:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re

pa ne vraćam se uređivanju članaka, jer mi je dosta da se raspravljam sa svakakvim budalama, ali pošto vidim da moje mape ni posle 2 godine niko nije dirao, onda se svakako vraćam crtanju mapa. a kakve mape misliš da treba nacrtati? PANONIAN 09:57, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nisu u pitanju samo rasprave, jer pre nego sto sam otišao sa Vikipedije nekoliko hrvatskih i mađarskih korisnika su se udružili protiv mene (čak sam video da pričaju o tom udruživanju u privatnim razgovorima), pa su počeli da me progone, da prate moje izmene i onda da menjaju sve što ja promenim, a na kraju su pravili i lažne korisničke naloge sa kojima su sami sebe vređali i onda optuživali mene administratorima da su to moji lažni nalozi i da ih to ja vređam i da me treba zbog toga blokirati - sa tako bolesnim ljudima je stvarno nemoguće ovde raditi, pogotovo zato što ne postoji sistem da se takvom ponašanju stane na put i to je velika mana ovog projekta. što se tiče mapa, trenutno planiram da nacrtam mape svih opština vojvodine, zatim da popravim neke moje ranije mape sa čijim kvalitetom nisam skroz zadovoljan, a onda ćemo videti šta ću raditi dalje. inače, u Beočinu sam bio nedavno poslom, da sam znao da ti trebaju slike, slikao bih, ali sada ne znam kada ću opet ići tamo. pozdrav. PANONIAN 22:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

iskreno, nemam sad ni toliko vremena za rad na Vikipediji kao ranije, jer sada imam mnogo više obaveza u životu. ako stignem možda nešto novo i napišem (evo danas sam sredio članak o Novom Naselju na sr Vikipediji jer je bio stvarno kratak). Inače, ako baš hoćeš da središ članke o Novom Sadu na sr Vikipediji, imaš na en Vikipediji materijala o tome koji možeš da prevedeš (na primer u člancima o delovima grada). i da pitam i ja tebe nešto: jel znaš možda gde mogu naći mapu granica srezova u Vojvodini 1931 godine? PANONIAN 20:36, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re

I can make such maps, of course, but since I am bussy with other things right now, you will have to wait a while until I find time for that. PANONIAN 20:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: NS

Bulevar Cara Lazara, slikano je sa Limenske strane, a zgrade su Grbavica :) Zar nisi ti iz NSa :P --Göran S (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tj, zeznuo sam se, hehe. :) To ti je raskrsnica Bulevara Jase Tomica i Rumenacke, znaci Detelinara je to. Mada nemoj tu sliku koristiti, posto te kuce sa leve strane vise nema, a i to gradiliste sa desne strane ne postoji, posto je zgrada je vec izgradjena. Slikacemo ponovo, ako treba. :) --Göran S (talk) 13:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia.org in English

Hallo,BokicaK

may I remind you,that you are at wikipedia.org,the English page. So any contributions should be written in English, in respect to English speaking readers all over the world. Thank you for cooperation.--Speidelj (talk) 20:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever... -- Bojan 20:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Najljepša hvala!--Speidelj (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Podgorica

Well, I could add some information on the Medieval Age & fix it up.

As for that, if I see, that has already been solved over at the Serbian Wikipedia (J. Erdeljanovic). --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]