Jump to content

Behavioral modernity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.16.176.166 (talk) at 19:40, 29 June 2009 (→‎Continuity hypothesis). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Paleolithic
↑ Pliocene (before Homo)
Lower Paleolithic
 (c. 3.3 Ma – 300 ka)
Middle Paleolithic
 (c. 300–50 ka)
Upper Paleolithic
 (c. 50–12 ka)

Fertile Crescent:

Europe:

Africa:

Siberia:

↓ Mesolithic

Behavioral modernity is a term used in anthropology, archeology and sociology to refer to a list of traits that distinguish present day humans and their recent ancestors from both living primates and other extinct hominid lineages. It is the point at which Homo sapiens began to demonstrate a reliance on abstract thought and to express cultural creativity. These developments are often thought to be associated with the origin of language.[1]

There are two main theories regarding when modern human behavior emerged.[2] One theory holds that modern human behavior is basically the result of the gradual accumulation of knowledge, skills and culture occurring over hundreds of thousands of years of human evolution.[3] Proponents of this view include Stephen Oppenheimer in his book Out of Eden, and John Skoyles and Dorion Sagan in their book Up from Dragons: The evolution of human intelligence.

The second theory holds that there was single technological or cognitive revolution. Behavioral modernity occurred as a sudden event some 50 kya (50,000 years ago), possibly as a result of a major genetic mutation or as a result of a biological reorganization of the brain that led to the emergence of modern human natural languages.[4] Proponents of this theory refer to this event as the Great Leap Forward[5] or the Upper Paleolithic Revolution.

Definition

Modern human behavior is observed in cultural universals which are the key elements shared by all groups of people throughout the history of humanity. Examples of elements that may be considered cultural universals are language, religion, art, music, myth, cooking, games, and jokes. While some of these traits distinguish Homo sapiens from other species in their degree of articulation in language based culture, they all have analogues in animal ethology. Since cultural universals are found in all cultures including some of the most isolated indigenous groups, scientists believe that these traits must have evolved or have been invented in Africa prior to the exodus.[6][7][8][9]

Classic evidence of behavioral modernity includes:

A more terse definition of the evidence is the behavioral B's: blades, beads, burials, bone toolmaking, and beauty.[10]

It might be thought that behavioral modernity preceded language, but the complex behaviors from the list above are thought to suggest language was necessary and that they must have been at least contemporary developments.[citation needed]

Timing

Upper paleolithic, 16,000 years old, cave painting from Lascaux cave in France

Whether modern behavior emerged as a single event or gradually is the subject of vigorous debate.

Great leap forward

See also: Upper Paleolithic and Late Stone Age

Advocates of this theory argue that the great leap forward occurred sometime between 50-40 kya in Africa or Europe. They argue that humans who lived in Africa before 50 kya were behaviorally primitive and indistinguishable from other hominids such as the Neanderthals or Homo erectus. Proponents of this view base their evidence on the abundance of complex artifacts, such as artwork and bone tools of the Upper Paleolithic, that appear in the fossil record after 50 kya. They argue that such artifacts are absent from the fossil record from before 50 kya, indicating that earlier hominids lacked the cognitive skills required to produce such artifacts.

Jared Diamond states that humans of the Acheulean and Mousterian cultures lived in an apparent stasis, experiencing little cultural change. This was followed by a sudden flowering of fine toolmaking, sophisticated weaponry, sculpture, cave painting, body ornaments, and long-distance trade.[11] Humans also expanded into hitherto uninhabited environments, such as Australia and Northern Eurasia.[11]

The Great Leap Forward was concurrent with the contact with the Neanderthals.

Continuity hypothesis

File:BBC-artefacts.jpg
Middle Stone Age bifacial points, engraved ochre and bone tools from the c. 75 - 80,000 year old M1 & M2 phases at Blombos cave
Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from the 75,000 year old levels at Blombos Cave a) aperture made with bone tool

Proponents of the continuity hypothesis hold that no single genetic or biological change is responsible for the appearance of modern behavior. They contend that modern human behavior is the result of sociocultural and sociobiological evolution occurring over hundreds of thousands of years.

Continuity theorists base their assertions on evidence of modern behavior that can be seen in the Middle Stone Age (approximately 250 - 50 kya) at a number of sites in the Levant and Africa. Mousterian ritual burial with grave goods at Qafzeh is having been dated to 90 kya and the cranial fossil show continuity or mixture of Neanderthal and southern traits. The use of pigment is noted at several [midle stone age|MSA]] sites in Africa dating back more than 100 kya. The findings of Curtis Marean and his colleagues of fishing and symbolic behavior dating to 164,000 years ago on the southern African coast strongly support this analysis.[12]

Continuity theorists believe that what appears to be a technological revolution at the onset of the Upper Paleolithic is most likely a result of increased cultural exchange resulting from a growing human population. Some continuity theorists also argue that the rapid pace of cultural evolution during the Upper Paleolithic transition may have been triggered by adverse environmental conditions such as aridity arising from glacial maxima.[1] They further dispute that anatomical modernity predates behavioral modernity, stating that changes in human anatomy and behavioral changes occurred stepwise.[3]

References

  1. ^ a b Mellars, Paul (2006). "Why did modern human populations disperse from Africa ca. 60,000 years ago?". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103: 9381. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510792103. PMID 16772383.
  2. ^ Mayell, Hillary (2003). "When Did "Modern" Behavior Emerge in Humans?". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  3. ^ a b Mcbrearty (2000). "The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ Ehrlich, Paul R. (2002). Human Natures: Genes, Cultures, and the Human Prospect. Island Press. pp. 159–160. ISBN 978-1-559-63779-4.
  5. ^ Diamond, Jared (1999). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fate of Human Societies. W. W. Norton. p. 39. ISBN 978-0-393-31755-8.
  6. ^ leap to language
  7. ^ Buller, David (2005). Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. PMIT Press. p. 468. ISBN 0262025795.
  8. ^ 80,000-year-old Beads Shed Light on Early Culture
  9. ^ three distinct human populations
  10. ^ William H. Calvin, A Brief History of the Mind (Oxford University Press 2004), chapter 9
  11. ^ a b Diamond, Jared (1992). The Third Chimpanzee. Harper Perennial. pp. 47–57. ISBN 978-0-060-98403-8.
  12. ^ Schwarz, J. http://uwnews.org/article.asp?articleID=37362

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Behavioral_modernity&oldid=299369150"