Template talk:Star Fox

Video games Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Template

This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

List of Hatsune Miku: Colorful Stage! characters (4 participants)
Andreas Waldetoft (2 participants)
Comparison of OpenGL and Direct3D (1 participant)
Matt Firor (0 participants)
Portugal 1111: A Conquista de Soure (5 participants; relisted)
Jon Radoff (1 participant)
Iikka Keränen (3 participants; relisted)
Miika Huttunen (1 participant; relisted)
Harry M. Rubin (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Star Fox DS

Where does Star Fox DS belong on the list. I know there is an "Unreleased Games" category, but I figured that was for games that never saw release, not for games that are in production. Maybe we should change it to "Cancelled Games"? -- VederJuda 22:57, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds OK. Thunderbrand 23:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Someone should fix the template. It is missing a lot of info, like unreleased and stuff. --yadayada, unsigned comment: 24.218.198.220

Yeah, but the new template guidelines stated: "Exclude unreleased games and games never released in English unless the series as a whole was never released in English. If space is at a premium, also exclude unreleased, upcoming games. If an unreleased game is particularly noteworthy (noteworthy as in Duke Nukem Forever noteworthy, not Foo-Raider-4-is-the-much-anticipated-next-game-in-the-Foo-Raider-series noteworthy), make sure to include it." So, really, I think we should only add in Star Fox 2, if that's even noteworthy enough. Blinkstale 05:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Does it look OK?--AgreeneyedFox 07:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of info

Yes it has the Games and Characters But that's not enough. It should have links to the Arwing page, Land Master, Blue Marine, Wolven, OR make a "Ships in Star-fox universe page" which links to all the ships (and includes some info on the ships in Command). There should also be a link in this template to the "Planets in Star fox" and other Star Fox articals right now its just Games and Characters, which isn't good enough.

Well My opinion.

(I've added Planets and Locations already, still think there should be something about ships) •Planets and Locations

The template doesn't need to link to every single article in Category:Star Fox. Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games/Navboxes has more on what the video game project has agreed upon for the appearance of navboxes. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 03:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well its so much handier to browse User:R.J.Mackay

"Star Fox" vs. "StarFox"

Based on the actual game packages for this entire series, the title seems to NOT include a space. So why are we calling these games "Star Fox" with a space in the middle that does not appear to be there in the primary source? --Bishop2 (talk) 19:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to lists

It seem to me that linking to characters within a list is useful for navigation, despite not being a separate article. Should this template link to all the main characters? The space is not being used for anything else. RP9 (talk) 20:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]