Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Mentors

WP:GAN/M

The following is a list of users who have volunteered to act as mentors to good articles reviewers. New reviewers are strongly encouraged to contact one of the editors below on their user talk page for assistance and advice on using the good article nominations process, applying the good article criteria, and producing a good review. All reviewers are welcome to contact mentors for advice on individual issues.

Please note that the listing of a user below is not a guarantee that they will be able to respond to a particular mentoring request. It is probably a good idea to check user contributions to make sure that the user is recently active.

Mentors often specialize in reviewing articles within a particular area. They also may have expertise in a particular aspect of the GA process. This is indicated after their user names below.

List of mentors

This user is a Good articles mentor.

(Userbox)

Editors willing to mentor can add their name to this list using {{User|username}}, followed by their reviewing interests.

Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs) – Can assist with issues concerning images, inline citations/references, GA sweeps, and GA nominations general questions. A list of the reviews I have performed can be seen at my GA subpage.
EyeSerene (talk · contribs) – Can advise on most aspects of GA. No particular preferences ;)
bibliomaniac15 (talk · contribs) – Mostly experienced with CVG and organism GAs, but I'm pretty sure I can handle image, citation, and general questions about GAN.
Yamanbaiia (talk · contribs) – Manual of Style enthusiast.
Juliancolton (talk · contribs) – I can help with pretty much anything related to the GA process.
OhanaUnited (talk · contribs) – Sweeps, references, weasel words, and jargon words
Ceranthor (talk · contribs) – I'll do anything, as long as it is geography, animals, science, etc.
Protonk (talk · contribs) – Economics, some math, history, anything but music or sports. Happy to offer a second opinion on request.
Weebiloobil (talk · contribs) – I am particularly experienced with Arts articles, being in the Doctor Who assessment committee, but also good with Society and Culture; I am also interested in neutrality - weebiloobil (talk) 15:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Skomorokh (talk · contribs) – topic areas of focus include literature, philosophy and politics; particularly familiar with referencing and research
Majoreditor (talk · contribs) – I am happy to help with most any type of review.
Sanguis Sanies (talk · contribs) - Anything Film and Television related, I'll take stab at anything else: the two GA articles I helped were both Law related.
Mm40 (talk · contribs) – Quality of prose and reference formatting are strong points in my reviews. History, arts, or sports related articles, see here for my reviews.