User talk:Jpgordon

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

For older history, check [1] as well as the archives.

The Holocaust

Jpgordon, just to let you know there is a discussion ongoing here. Do you care to weigh in with an opinion? Bus stop (talk) 19:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done--jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for noticing. I'm unsure how to proceed: the CU didn't report on the IP socks listed, but I don't want to nag if it is just a work in progress. Given the contribs from those IP socks its just ducky that they are the same as the named user account, but were used to avoid clear responsibility for the actions evoked by the "coaching".LeadSongDog come howl 17:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Functionalism versus intentionalism

I came across this watching recent changes. I'd like your opinion on this version of the article versus the present ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Functionalism_versus_intentionalism&diff=335676608&oldid=335676493) version. I don't know enough of the subject to know which is better. I wanted to revert to the vesion with references, but honestly I didn't know if that would be a mistake. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Tiderolls 19:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Israel and other countries

Apologies for taking my time in responding to your question. I've been under some real life constraints and was also unsure on how to explain myself without making a seemingly delicate situation problematic. Anyways, I felt that extending the template to have a unique value for Israel alone while having a different value for other countries is (in my eyes, at least) in poor taste. There are many places when such changes can be made and I am not aware of any where such a solution is actually implemented.
Warm regards, Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 11:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Misconceptions2#Misconceptions2

I wondered if I could ask you to expand a bit on your findings to confirm how widespread the cross over between IPs wass with this user? If one IP is the main one with the the other ip used was only during the blocks it gives credence to this being two users, plus are their any occasions when the ips were being used separately to edit different articles at the same time? I realise CU isn't magic pixie dust but the answers to this would help disentangle if we had one or two editors here. Thanks for your help. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhh... I was having fun...

Jessica is fun to play with sometimes... Did you havta do that? --Jayron32 07:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whack-a-mole is how I have fun. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 07:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, *that* Jessica. Good times. Heh. tedder (talk) 07:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cherrylimerickey

>>One must wonder: why have you been autoblocked twice, on two different IPs, because of blocks upon User:Haida chieftain? Is it just coincidence that you've edited on different IPS, within minutes of each other as this editor? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)<<[reply]

All the editing I've done recently on Wikipedia - and virtually all the editing I've ever done - has been on public access terminals provided by the branches of my local library. Unfortunately one of the many other library patrons who avail themselves of this library service is evidently using poor judgement in his or her editing of Wikipedia causing these IP address autoblock issues that have effected me. That the IP address of the computer system in my local libraries is subject to change is an evident attribute of my local libraries' computer system that I really cannot comment on.--Cherrylimerickey (talk) 01:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gigogag sock

Hello, Jpgordon. I noticed your recent edit to User:Dock26 Pwnage's talk page, and I was wondering what his "latest" sockpuppet was you were referring to. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That would be User:MagicZeus. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What article did he create that led you to believe he is a sock (just curious)? Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No article. But I checkusered User:Dock26 Pwnage in response to his protestations of innocence, and noticed the brand new sock. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:TwoHorned

Hi, I see you have blocked this user for multiple account abuse, I have had a fair bit of connection with this editor in the recent week, I can't find the details could you please provide me with a link to the details, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 17:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:TwoHorned and User talk:AdvaitNirukta‎‎ should explain. In particular, the unblock requests. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet block

I don't see how I'm supposed to deal with the situation. My defense on the sockpuppet page has been ignored and I have yet to receive a response even though the case is marked as closed. I can't appeal any of my blocks because I can't even edit my talk pages. I'm not allowed to start over and create a new account, even if I don't vandalize and make legitimate edits. I joined Wikipedia with User:NYyankees51 in May 2006 and had few problems since then, and now I'm blocked forever. I really have no idea what I'm supposed to do. 71.178.26.97 (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you keep outing yourself by returning to the same articles. Perhaps that's not a wise approach. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]