Jump to content

User talk:Calibrador

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Northeastern292 (talk | contribs) at 00:53, 16 March 2010 (FG). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

American Idol

Is the rock 'n roll week edit okay now?


I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 00:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. There is already a set template established for the performance charts. Quit changing it. Gage (talk) 00:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TX-14

Let me explain why I deleted TX-14 here, where I have more room. We're only including districts where the incumbent is or is considering retirement or where s/he may be in a competitive reelection. To determine how vulnerable an incumbent is to a potential or declared challenger we need a verifiable, non-partisan source saying that the incumbent may be vulnerable. For instance, regarding SC-04, we have a Politico page saying the incumbent, Bob Inglis, is vulnerable to a primary challenge. For RI-01 we have an article from The Hill saying that Congressman Patrick Kennedy may be vulnerable to a Republican challenger despite Kennedy representing a very Democratic district.

The problem with the source you provided is that it is not non-partisan, it's clearly pro- Ron Paul. If we had a source such as CQ or Politico saying Paul may be vulnerable to Jeffrey Cherry that would merit putting TX-14 on the 2008 House page. But since we don't, we have no reason to see Paul as vulnerable to a primary challenge. Just drawing a challenge isn't enough to warrant placing TX-14 on the page: we need a non-partisan source telling us that Paul may be in danger. This doesn't mean that Cherry won't become competitive or isn't already competitive, it just means that until we have a credible source saying Paul may be in danger, we shouldn't include TX-14.

I hope this made more sense than my other explanation did. If you have any questions about what I said or disagreements, please put them on the 2010 House Elections discussion page. CylonCAG (talk) 01:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Finale

I've opened a discussion on the American Idol (season 8) talk page.  iMatthew :  Chat  19:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Homer Simpson.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Homer Simpson.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AI8

We have a user adding the "new" formatted tables without a consensus. Any help would be appreciated. I myself am very tired of the constant changes, almost all without a real consensus. --User:Woohookitty Diamming fool! 12:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obama Timeline

Great work and additions. My hope is that you won't mind if I caution you to be brief and controlled in your descriptions, etc. It is a timeline which is intended to be a chronology of "He was here, He did that. He met her:then signed a bill into law.'" with as little commentary as possible. The wider the door to commentary gets, the more political POV's we will encounter as the Administration proceeds. So far, it has been understood. Again, great edits and photos. (Not to sure about Judge Sotomayor Mom comments)...Take Care....--Buster7 (talk) 01:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gage...not to crazy about "reset". It seems a bit jargoney. I'm gonna change to "restructure". HAGD.--Buster7 (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, I put it in quotes because I had actually taken it from the CNN article that I added as a reference, and Secretary Clinton had used the exact word "reset" a few months ago in regards to Russian relations, but I see no problem in changing it to "restructure." Gage (talk) 13:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yea, Gage. I see that now. If 'reset' becomes the active media word we can always change it back.--Buster7 (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Continuous great work.--Buster7 (talk) 23:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Offer Shlomi

You're right, it is. That's pretty weird... I always knew him as Vince Offer. I wonder why he goes by Vince? <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 05:45, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I assume it is just a nickname he decided to give himself. Gage (talk) 06:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinked

I noticed you tagged the article Christina Tchen as overlinked. I routinely check this category, and so I noticed this. I must say I do not see any irrelevant links in this article. Nor does it seem overly linked to me. It might be that the problem is the other way around: that there should be more text in this article. Anyway, I'd like to ask you to reconsider, or to remove any links you deem superfluous yourself. Debresser (talk) 23:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was referring to all of the redlinks within the article. Is that not the correct Template to use in that case? Gage (talk) 23:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read Wikipedia:Red link? Based on that, I would say that all redlinks in this article may be kept. I agree with you that is leaves to be desired from an estetic point of view, but I think they are all valid redlinks. Consequently, IMHO, this article is not overlinked. Debresser (talk) 00:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obama kids

Hello - I'll have to look for it - there were discussions about whether there should be a separate article(s) for the girls and it was decided that they didn't have independent notability, so were more appropriately handled as part of the family article. If you could hold off, I'll locate the discussions. You're of course welcome to discuss it, and if consensus has changed, that's fine - but please don't just reinstate. Thanks Tvoz/talk 06:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the delete discussion (speedy delete, in fact) for an earlier version of an article about Malia - there may have been additional discussions as well. I'll take a look tomorrow. Tvoz/talk 06:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Right, I was aware of that discussion, and that consensus of deletion was made before Obama's election as president. Anyway, if there were any other discussions regarding the article more recently, I would be glad to have a look at those as well. Thanks again. Gage (talk) 06:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgio Napolitano

Because he is already cite just before--87.3.185.218 (talk) 18:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I noticed that right after I readded his name. Do you have a reference for what you added about Giorgio Napolitano? As I was not able to find it in the reference that I had added. Gage (talk) 18:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, nevermind, thanks for adding a reference. Gage (talk) 18:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have recently edited the Legal Adviser of the Department of State, and I was wondering if you had any thoughts regarding the merger proposal I have initiated relating to that article. Please feel free to share any thoughts relating to my proposal on the article's Talk page. --TommyBoy (talk) 02:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

The Photographer's Barnstar
For your excellent image of Mr. Groening, File:Matt Groening by Gage Skidmore.jpg! :-) Theleftorium 10:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Gage. Thanks so much for the picture! Do you think it would bother you if we move the pic. to speaking engagements, because he is speaking at ComicCon? Thanks. miranda 20:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. Gage (talk) 23:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential Election 2012 article

Hi there,

Myself and Timmeh have had a strong discussion about a major change to this article. Before we did anything we wanted to get feedback from regular editors of this page, William S. Saturn, Hysteria18, Jerzeykydd, Ratemonth, JayJasper, GoodDay, Qqqqqq, GageSkidmore, Reywas92, and FallenMorgan. Please send this to anyone else I may have left and please read the thread on Ruled Out and give us your feedback.

--Diamond Dave 16:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by David1982m (talkcontribs)

Sotomayor Image

You're right it doesnt matter, I am sure the image will be replaced with her official supreme court portrait once it is taken anyway. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hence the reason why I tentively readded her circuit court image, which I had previously removed. I think the circuit court image can suffice until her official Associate Justice portrait is released, so I will readd it now, unless you object. Gage (talk) 16:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No objection here, happy editing. -TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Universe svg map

Hi! It's not that I have an issue against svg format. I just prefer using the png version for the Miss Universe 2009 results map for the sake of consistency--all results map since 1952, as well as for the other major pageants, are not just in png formats, but also use the world map version with connectors. Hence, if svg format is the preferred version of this great editor, then kindly backtrack all the remaining maps just for the pageant maps to hold the same format. Joey80 (talk) 02:36, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're still not responding to this message despite changing the Miss Universe 2009 results map to svg format again. Joey80 (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've already responded to your similar statement on the Commons. Gage (talk) 02:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey Gage, thanks again for keeping Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama constantly updated! I've been a bit neglectful since early spring and will try to get back into the routine. Besides, with healthcare this fall there will be plenty to write about... Joshdboz (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, any help is appreciated, as it has been a bit of a chore to constantly update the article. I try my best though. Gage (talk) 12:26, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Henry

Hi, I see you moved Mike Henry to a disambiguated title, and put a dab page up instead. When you do that, please watch out for "What links here" and avoid leaving links that go to the disambiguation page instead of a destination article. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 18:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, thank you for making me aware of this. Gage (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No apology needed! and anyway, it gave me an excuse to upgrade AWB! --AndrewHowse (talk) 19:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gage, I have colleagues who work for Avid Technologies and they asked me to reach out to you because they have a new trademarked logo which is the legally approved version. I don't believe I have privileges to overwrite the logo you had put up at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avid_Technology. I have it in JPG (see link below where I posted it to my Facebook page) ... please let me know if you can help us with this or give advice?

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=3603540&id=680996321

I can get you the names of my Avid contacts to verify the veracity of this logo, just let me know what you need from me. Thanks! Greendmedia (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've uploaded a new version. Is that sufficient for your new trademarked logo? And feel free to upload the JPG version, if it isn't. If you're too new, you can just make ten edits and you should be able to upload images. Gage (talk) 19:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FG

Thanks for ramping up the WP:FG, hey do you have expirience in editing fg.--Pedro J. the rookie 21:49, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'd say I have some experience in editing articles related to Family Guy. Gage (talk) 02:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

great look i am doing many projects in fg, so could you help me on some of them.--Pedro J. the rookie 18:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. Gage (talk) 20:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well thease are some. 1:Get FG to FA, 2:Get list of vocie characters to FL, 3:Get the Portal of Family Guy to a FA or GA, or season 5 of FG season 5 to FL. please chose.--Pedro J. the rookie 23:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i think you chose season 5?.--Pedro J. the rookie 21:16, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Gage (talk) 21:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

great, can you connect here here and room wpsimpsons.--Pedro J. the rookie 22:41, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I connected there. Gage (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wait a momment.--Pedro J. the rookie 22:45, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey those this work for that artical http://www.buddytv.com/articles/family-guy/fifth-season-of-family-guy-com-8493.aspxPedro J. the rookie 23:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I actually found the information on a different site, but I'll add this as a source on the article for more reference. Gage (talk) 23:52, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

great the artical by my point of view is finished, what do you think.--Pedro J. the rookie 23:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I want to expand the production section a little bit more. After that, then I think it will be pretty good in terms of being finished. Gage (talk) 23:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

great if you need help tell me or conect to JAVA.--Pedro J. the rookie 23:59, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

connect to java.--Pedro J. the rookie 00:40, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Connected. Gage (talk) 00:44, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

there are 2 of yo connected,.--Pedro J. the rookie 01:01, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

doo i nominate it.--Pedro J. the rookie 04:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'll notify you when I think I've added as much information that I can add. Gage (talk) 04:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

gret job, if you do not mind i put two other nomnaters, me and qst.--Pedro J. the rookie 12:53, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey if you wannt to hwelp me in my other proyects please go aheed.--Pedro J. the rookie 12:57, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey gage can you connect.--Pedro J. the rookie 20:59, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you review the FG peer review.--Pedro J. the rookie 23:58, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not a reviewer. Gage (talk) 01:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

are you planing to put death has a shadow on GAN?--Pedro J. the rookie 23:32, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to, yes. I hope to expand each of the first season episodes though. Gage (talk) 23:35, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tell me if you need help on something.--Pedro J. the rookie 23:48, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

could you do alt text in the fg page.--Pedro J. the rookie 01:53, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reviewed the FG pilot, now just awnser my concerns and done.--Pedro J. the rookie 21:20, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nice work death has a shadow is now a GA, also i read that you are planing to make FG sason 5 a GT, and i am up for it i already expanded the reception of some episodes.--Pedro J. the rookie 22:52, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Has someone discussed the connection between Go Stewie Go and the movie Mrs. Doubtfire? [1] Northeastern292 (talk) 00:53, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kara Vallow

I was asked by Kara to replace her picture on the page. She doesn't like the image of her and doesn't want it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RbiCreative (talkcontribs) 07:04, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

family guy season pages

Family guy does not have season DVD releases and the seasons are spread out on multiple volumes. For the case of season 5, it was released on volume5 and the second part on volume 6. The volume 6 info needs to be added to the season 5 page. It can also be added to the season 6 page since volume 6 contains episodes from that season as well. Grande13 (talk) 14:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a column for non-featured, notable guest/attendees. I hope this assist, and we can aviod an edit war. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please join us at Talk:San Diego Comic-Con International to help resolve the present issue regarding the article. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avid logo revisited

Hi Gage! I got a note from my friend at Avid and he tells me he had sent me the wrong version of the logo. I am sorry to bother you again, would you please replace the current logo with the one I recently attached in my Facebook account at http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/photo.php?pid=3719958&id=680996321

I appreciate the assist! Liz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.131.225.137 (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fixed. Let me know if you need anything else. Gage (talk) 00:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Sanford on 2012 Republican Primary Page?

I think the Sanford debate will never end, lol. I have 3 sources that are still discussing Mark Sanford in conjunction to 2012 that are less than 6 months old, but JerzeyKydd is still insisting that discussion for him has ceased for 6 months. The sources I added are less than 6 months. I agreed to take down Ensign because no one is talking him in conjunction 2012, but why are people still talking about Sanford in conjunction 2012? I was wondering if maybe you wanted to add your feedback to this discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012. Thanks. --Diamond Dave (talk) 22:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have cable or dish, so I can't confirm if the episode has aired on Adult Swim or not. Are you able to confirm or deny its airing? CTJF83 chat 17:11, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Grande13 confirmed it did not air, thanks anyway :) CTJF83 chat 18:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

can you help me in the lead of the FG cast, i am not good at them.--Pedro J. the rookie 20:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy

Hi, I noticed you uploaded an image of the design changes of Peter Griffin, I have two questions I would like to ask you. This "pilot" episode you took the first screenshot from, I've never heard/read about it, do you have some information about? Also, I noticed in the image description that you used the Family Guy Volume 1 DVD as a source, do you own this DVD? Because its special features might help expand the Peter Griffin article's Development section. Thanks.--Music26/11 11:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can actually watch the pilot episode on YouTube by simply searching for "Family Guy pilot," and you should be able to find it. And I don't have the volume one DVD, sorry. Gage (talk) 11:23, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No prob, just curious.--Music26/11 13:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FG2

I am making this section because the other one is too long, hey can you do me a favor couls you check on the FG history and tell me what do you think it needs, and this is juust a questio as i am new add FL when you make someones concerns they should supporrt but we have made concerns and we do not have any supporrt.--Pedro J. the rookie 14:53, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you are wanting me to do. Gage (talk) 14:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you tell me what you think it is not a review just your opinion.--Pedro J. the rookie 14:58, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Think about what? Sorry, I'm still a little confused. Gage (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, if it has a good shape, prose, refrences, i am planing to make it a GA.--Pedro J. the rookie 15:10, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The History of Family Guy article? Gage (talk) 15:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes sorry for being so confuseing and not giveing detail hope to be forgivin .--Pedro J. the rookie 15:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks very good overall. I think it could use some free-use images, of MacFarlane maybe, or the like. It should have a very good chance of becoming GA, in my opinion. Gage (talk) 15:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)b[reply]

Thanks Gage, can you connect.--Pedro J. the rookie 15:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Added copule of refs to brian dose hollywood hope i could help.--Pedro J. the rookie 19:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why are they so many merge articals in the season 3.--Pedro J. the rookie 21:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Because they were all unreferenced. I'm working on it though. Gage (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What do you need help with? I'm not happy with any of the pages just being merged. CTJF83 chat 22:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, adding references to all the articles currently tagged with the Template:Notability banner. This includes a majority of the season 3 articles. For a rough example, see this as a very basic guideline. And for the articles that were merged (without any consensus whatsoever), adding references, and reverting the merges by Feydey should help to establish notability. Gage (talk) 22:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ya, an admin should know better than to just merge with no consensus and no real reason. I'll get to work on them later tonight. CTJF83 chat 22:44, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hold on! Why are you removing the season episode list from episode pages?? CTJF83 chat 23:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll go ahed and ask the same question.--Pedro J. the rookie 23:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was only following what was done on the North by North Quahog article. Gage (talk) 23:18, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
O yes now i remember, it is samller but a bit anoinan is ther any way to do like the simopsons articals.--Pedro J. the rookie 23:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ok, you just haven't the list of episode link to the other pages. CTJF83 chat 23:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
what source are you using for the family guy episodes airdates for dog gone and such Grande13 (talk) 14:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Need you opinion here --Pedro J. the rookie 20:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gage can byou put producction to the non-GA episodes of season 5 i think nyou have the dvds.--Pedro J. the rookie 22:06, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE

Will try doing homework so it willl take time but i will.--Pedro J. the rookie 20:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

could not find any will help in disscusion--Pedro J. the rookie 00:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that the artical did not make FL but i will try it again in a small amount of time.Cheers.--Pedro J. the rookie 11:03, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you now how to copy-edit--Pedro J. the rookie 21:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, I do not copyedit. Ask User:Scapler again. Gage (talk) 21:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TUFF Puppy image

Hey where did you get that T.U.F.F. Puppy promo image? It looks awesome!76.255.214.133 (talk) 06:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC) a man who awaits the premire of said show[reply]

It was released by Butch Hartman on his personal Facebook. Gage (talk) 15:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, I take it you want to see the show too?76.255.214.133 (talk) 15:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, I just simply saw the article needed an image. Gage (talk) 00:43, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I just felt like asking76.255.214.133 (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comic Con

You maybe interested in the fact that User:MikeWazowski has not allowed the reintroduction of removed content in the compromise column which was created for said content. You are more then welcome to join in the present discussion regarding the matter.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 14:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FG season 5

look gage i say peace no more fights, look i was thinking tha after the list passes(god make it happen)can you help me out makeing the season a GT--Pedro J. the rookie 20:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

County maps

Hey. I remember for the NJ gubernatorial election and the Massachusetts senate election you put a blank county map. Do you know where I can find a blank county map for any state??????--Jerzeykydd (talk) 00:21, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You create your own. Gage (talk) 00:26, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:New Jersey Counties Outline.svg also. CTJF83 chat 00:27, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think we need this page? It looks incomplete as it stops at D. CTJF83 chat 07:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article can be greatly improved, redirecting the article as opposed to expanding it simply because it looks incomplete is wrong, in my opinion. Gage (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How do you separate a character from a recurring one? CTJF83 chat 22:29, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A recurring character is a supporting character, such as a coworker, a family friend, local celebrities, extended relatives and townspeople. With most of these characters as one-time jokes, a number of them have garnered expanded roles and have subsequently starred in future episodes, as well as in their own episodes. Death, Consuela and Angela are just a few examples of this. Gage (talk) 05:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photografic genisus

The Photographer's Barnstar
For your images on The cast, the show and the pilot you are the best image updater ever, but sadly i can only give you this hope at least it can make you see what you do for Fg and for the simpsons, THANKS;)--Pedro J. the rookie 14:42, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Wanted to let you now i have nominated Family Guy for FAC and informeing major FG contributers.--Pedro J. the rookie 18:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

Gage remember as season 5 renominaated could you give me a hand, your support did not count as Dabomb added you as a nominator(which you are you helped alot in the last FLC) so could you give me a han d maybe contact users to review or something. ThAnKs--Pedro J. the rookie 15:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saturday Night Live

A proposal has been created for WikiProject Saturday Night Live. Please leave comments, and consider joining as a potential project member.Mainly.generic (talk) 13:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me a bit on the ploy\t it may need a bit of re-word, its on GAN.--Saint Pedrolas J. Hohohohohoh merry christmas 01:56, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Debate over whether or not Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford should be removed the 2012 Rep Primary Page

There seems to be yet another debate over Mark Sanford and now whether not Bobby Jindal should remain on this page. Since you are an editor on this page, I was hoping you would be interested in joining the discussion at the link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012#This_article_is_not_about_who_will_be_running.3F

Please provide your feedback! Thanks so much!

--Diamond Dave (talk) 20:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Conway

What's the problem with the picture of him that I uploaded?--Jerzeykydd (talk) 00:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The government of Kentucky isn't the United States government. Portraits by individual states, in most cases, are not in the public domain. Gage (talk) 01:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I personally emailed the Attorney General and he said that it is ok for me to use the pic for wikipedia. What should I do now?--Jerzeykydd (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:OTRS. Gage (talk) 21:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rand Paul

You made a mistake. MJ787123 is the vandal on the Rand Paul page, I am the one who just recently corrected all his stuff. And put your previous photos back where they were.

Also, re:Rand Paul's middle name, yes I have a source. If you go here: https://cdcbp.ky.gov/VICWeb/VIC and look up Randal Paul and his date of birth, you can see his middle name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CullVernon (talkcontribs) 09:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of things

Hi. I've been looking over your contributions and you certainly seem to do good work here. I've gone ahead and issued you rollback rights. Please be careful with the privilege - it can be easily lost. I recommend you carefully read up on the what you should do and should not do with rollback, then practice here before using it. I'm confident you'll use it wisely. If for some reason you don't want it, let me know and I'll revert. You may wish to display {{User rollback}} on your user page.

The other thing, is you really should start archiving this talk page. It's getting rather long and unweildy.

Happy editing. Toddst1 (talk) 14:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Obama cabinet nominations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.. — MrDolomite • Talk 07:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FG

Hey gage have not heared from you in a while, sorry to say that the FLC did not pass.--Saint Pedrolas J. Hohohohohoh merry christmas 12:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries please

Hi, can you please fill out your edit summaries, even if the changes are minor? You make so many edits, and I actually watch the changes; it's considered a common courtesy, thank you! – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 07:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien interview.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien interview.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ÷seresin 22:43, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for deletion

I have nominated several images you have uploaded for deletion:

The discussions are all here. ÷seresin 01:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements in Texas

We can try to consolidate it like Mitt Romney's endorsements in Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2008.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would support that. Gage (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've conducted the GAN review for Dog Gone (Family Guy). There are a number of sourcing concerns that need to be addressed before it can pass. Please see my comments in the review page. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 21:06, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Perry photo

thanks for adding my rick perry photo to wiki!

i considered adding it myself as a fellow wiki "Jonathanmallard" but there was a better photo already there...what happened to it?

I photo the gov quite frequently...ill see if i cant get a better one.

jon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.122.220 (talk) 15:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The one that got removed was a copyright violation. Yes, if you do get some better ones, feel free to upload them to the Wikimedia Commons. Gage (talk) 20:46, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Massachusetts 2010 Governor's Race page

Why did you remove polling for Jill Stein on Massachusetts gubernatorial election, 2010? Her candidacy is entirely valid, and people looking for information on this election deserve to know all the fact, don't they? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.50.168 (talk) 07:09, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Griffin's House of Pain/Payne

Fox flash has it as Pain, you moved it back to payne after saying fox flash had it as pain, why the move back? CTJF83 chat 18:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to Grande13, it's officially Payne, according to Fox Flash. I was unaware that Fox Flash had made the correction, hence the revert of my own move. Gage (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok CTJF83 chat 06:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dial Meg for Murder - Family Guy promo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dial Meg for Murder - Family Guy promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:56, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]