Jump to content

User talk:Tea with toast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tue Sorensen (talk | contribs) at 06:05, 15 April 2010 (→‎24. :-D: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hi,

Just wanted to say thanks for the excellent work here. Cheers! Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 00:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neuron growth/Cannabis

Hi there, Here is the study about marijuana and neuron growth... [[1]]. There is discussion that the article should be split, but until it is, this article includes studies such as this one. For this reason, I am adding this part back into the article and just wanted to let you know. Thanks! Tpipos (talk) 22:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Sambunot, an article that you have edited, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sambunot (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 17:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to How Holocausts Happen

Hi there, Tea with toast. (Nice username, by the way.) I was just wondering why you removed the copyedit and wikify tags in How Holocausts Happen in this edit. It still needs copyediting and wikifying; were you planning on making these improvements? Mononomic (talk) 03:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mononomic, (and thanks, you have a nice one as well) I removed those tags because I felt the article did not need them. I found the formatting of the page to be fine and I could find no other relevant internal links to be made or writing errors in need of fixing. The article still suffers from being "essay-like", but I'm not quite sure how to fix that, so I left that tag there. --Tea with toast (talk) 03:35, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you were at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. Anyways, I was wondering if you would like to copyedit the article Flag of Japan. There is issues with the prose, but I am not sure if I will be able to make it sounds clear and still give the information I want. Thanks. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 23:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Zscout370, I find myself in the same position as you when it comes to smoothing out the prose. Overall, I find the article is fairly well written, and I do not think I would be able to contribute very much. But I wish you good luck in you noble aim to improve it! --Tea with toast (talk) 22:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for copyediting

Hi there. Do you have time to help out with the article Electric Mud? (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 00:49, 21 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, Ibaranoff24, the article seems to be fairly well off. I find no major grammatical errors and the only thing I find that needs improvement is in the area of style –making the sentences flow better. That area is not my forte, especially when it comes to articles where I am not familiar with the content and am uncertain of the direction of the article. Unfortunately, I do not think I would be able to help this article very much. I would suggestion asking another editor, perhaps one who is more familiar with blues/rock music and has worked on album articles before. I wish you luck! --Tea with toast (talk) 22:00, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Neuroscience

Hi, thanks for adding your name. I've been keeping watch over the project for the past year or so -- if there's anything I can do to be helpful to you, please let me know. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 18:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar! —hike395 (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Thanks for the anti-vandal barnstar. The articles about felids, like the cats themselves, need to be kept tidy. And, in some cases, improved. Thank you for noticing my efforts. Nice user page, BTW. Seduisant (talk) 03:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

S.A.Wakefield

I've posted a note about this propopsed deletion on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australian literature. Not because I think you are wrong. Just because this is an Australian author and Bottersnikes and Gumbles is a classic of Australian children's Literature. Could possibly merge author details into the book page, which also needs work.--Plad2 (talk) 09:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice that your PROD tag has been removed by an admin User:DGG? I'm wondering what should happen next. Since he's quite an experienced admin, I suppose we could discuss merging this page with Bottersnikes and Gumbles, or whether we just leave it as it is. If we feel strongly that it should be deleted, we could take it to AfD. Your thoughts?--Plad2 (talk) 07:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles lacking reliable references

Hi there! Thanks for your note on my Talk page. I'm now having an OMG moment about the articles listed as Wikipedia:WikiProject Children's literature/Cleanup listing#Articles lacking reliable references, which I've just started looking at. A lot of work to do there and I propose using the same criteria as for the Unreferenced BLPs. Any help you feel like giving there would be great!--Plad2 (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently proposed some extensive changes to the layout of project pages in WikiProject Children's literature. The changes can be viewed in my sandbox, and are summarised on this talk page. The proposed changes include major reformatting of the main project page, the creation of five new project sub-pages, and moves to two existing sub-pages. Please look over these proposals, and join the discussion. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 10:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessments

Hi there! Just wanted to thank you for your help with the assessments of the articles about the places in Russia. Also wanted to point out that we normally rate the articles about the cities/towns (and larger urban-type settlements, especially those which serve as district administrative centers) as Mid-importance, and the cities which are the capitals/administrative centers of the federal subjects (like Penza) as High-importance. It's not that big of a deal, but helps keep ratings consistent. In other regards, you are doing great. Thanks again!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 22, 2010; 15:35 (UTC)

Midazolam

Thanks for spotting the repeated link to elimination half life, but you shouldn't pipe it to Biological half-life - see WP:NOTBROKEN for an explanation of why we prefer to link to the redirect rather than pipe it. --RexxS (talk) 03:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leopard GAN

See Talk:Leopard/GA2. Ucucha 21:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NVO discussion on the "Coronation of the Russian Monarch" article

You may have noticed that user NVO and myself have engaged in a rather lively discussion on various objections he has raised to the Coronation of the Russian monarch article that you are GA reviewing. I think that he raised some valid points (especially on the issue of portraits and to a more limited extent, on sources, though I disagreed with him sharply on portions of his argument there), but I also took issue with him on some other subjects he raised. Each of us has expressed our opinion, and I totally respect him and his right to express his thoughts (and I'm sure he feels the same about me). I was curious as to what you thought of the issues he had raised, and the responses I have made, as you are the one reviewing the article for GA assessment. Although the discussion is still ongoing in a general sense, he did in essence "release" the article back to you (my term, not his) for your continued review and comment. I am simply curious as to where you stand on the issues he raised, after reading his comments and mine. Thanks for your time, and thanks for looking at this article! - Ecjmartin (talk) 02:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darius I GAN

I think I've adressed all of your issues at Talk:Darius I of Persia/GA1. Thanks, -- warrior4321 14:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Midazolam

Hello, I am wondering if you have forgotten about the midazolam article? I made the changes that you suggested; I am wondering if it is ready to promote to GA. If you are too busy at the moment then no worries or pressure; in your own time. :)--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 22:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Leopard today were reverted by a Bot

Hello TFT - I saw that you've done much work today on the Leopard article; many thanks.

I also saw that this edit by Robbot effectively destroyed all your work. Since you're familiar with what you've done, and I'm really not, I've not reverted Robbot's edits, and will leave it to you to decide what to do. --Seduisant (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ucucha reverted the bot's edits. All is well. --Seduisant (talk) 00:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Children's literature has recently launched a new Collaboration department. The first Collaboration Article is Curious George (book) - please contribute in any way that you can! If you wish to be alerted to future collaboration articles, this template will be updated regularly, and can be included on your user page as a template. Thank you, strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 17:05, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Midazolam

Sorry to trouble you, I have replied to your message on the GA review page. :)--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 22:36, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Music of the Xenosaga series

Hey, I saw that you put yourself forth as the reviewer for this article at GAN, but haven't touched it in the 5 days since and have marked yourself as being on wikibreak. Do you still plan to do a review, or should I take your name off? --PresN 18:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to worry you, I will continue with the review. --Tea with toast (talk)
I fixed the point of concern you raised; is there anything else you think needs to be fixed? --PresN 23:42, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

24. :-D

Hey. Newbie here. Thanks for welcoming me. The first thing I'm wondering is, how do I get a user page as impressive as yours?! Is there some organizing system one can use to personalize one's page like you have...?--Tue Sorensen (talk) 06:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]