Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kingpin13 (talk | contribs) at 13:39, 16 April 2010 (undo, due to error later on in run). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Autoreviewer (add request)

Shortcut

User:ScienceApologist

I make articles for the physics and astronomy departments at my university when they are found not to have relevant articles on those subjects. -ScienceApologist (talk) 23:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the need for the user right - your last article created is in September 2009. Are you saying that you are planning to create a number of articles soon? Tim Song (talk) 23:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. ScienceApologist (talk) 23:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Looking at your contribs, I'm fairly sure you know what you are doing, so  Done. Tim Song (talk) 08:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sulmues

78 articles created so far: almost all of them in the last four months. Active and joined Wikipedia in 2008 -Sulmues talk 16:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 17:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Areaseven

62 created articles, most recent on 9 January 2010, active as of 27 March 2010. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 01:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 17:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Auntof6

77 articles created, having trouble with soxred's tool on this one, but she's active as of 9 April 2010. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 19:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
X!'s tool is buggin' for me too, but I've manually gone back through every edit up to and including July 2009 - I see about ten dabs created and five articles all, each of which is content split from a single, previous page. Are all the other 72 from around a year or more ago? ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Going back through May, I found only William Lewis Moody, Jr. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:41, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Argos'Dad

57 articles created, most recent on 23 March 2010, active as of 9 April 2010. One speedy deletion back in 2008. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 19:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 17:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Oltianruci

133 articles created so far and as far as I know, no AFDs. Started on April 2008, most recent article is dated April 5 2010 -Sulmues talk 19:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done NW (Talk) 20:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Immunize

Have created several pages, and would like autoreviewer right to be able to mark my own new pages as patrolled. Immunize (talk) (talk) 20:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You have only created 13 pages. The recommended minimum for autoreview is 75. Also, several of your articles have no references, which is especially a problem if you ever decide to try your hand at writing BLPs. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 20:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Really? I suppose I did not fully understand the position I was requesting. Immunize (talk) (talk) 20:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I am wondering which articles are unreferenced, as I need to improve these articles by adding Verifiable sources. Immunize (talk) (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
North Baldface has a verification tag, Baldface-Royce Range has no references, Neurooncology has no references, Burnt Meadow Mountain has no references. The latter two are also one-sentence stubs; I would not be surprised if they were sent to AFD. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 20:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is often difficult to find references for articles on relatively obscure mountains, particularly because sources such as Hiking trip reports, blogs, and personal hiking websites are obviously not reliable sources. Immunize (talk) (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A true statement, but throwing together a handful of unreferenced stubs does not make you an experienced article creator. I would suggest coming back when you've created a few dozen more articles. Also, be sure to check out WP:DYK if you haven't already. Contributing to DYK will bring your article writing skills up to snuff in no time. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 21:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


User:BPK2

147 created articles, most recent on 5 March 2010, active as of 12 April 2010. Talk page looks clean. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 02:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Basement12

60 created articles, most recent on 15 April 2010. There's a talk page notice on unreferenced BLPs, but both articles are from several years ago. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 02:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bbadree

74 created articles, most recent on 3 April 2010, active as of 14 April 2010. User doesn't really seem to understand our image use policies, but that doesn't really matter. A few deletion notifications, but it looks like the articles are usually kept. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 02:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bds69

280 created articles(!), most recent on 27 March 2010, active as of 15 April 2010. Talk page is clean. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -FASTILY (TALK) 02:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Benniebop1991

68 created articles (probably more at this point), most recent on 9 April 2010. LOTS of fair use warnings on talk page, though I don't think that matters. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 22:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done User has received numerous fair-use warnings, several recent articles created by this user have been redirected, the user has not been very active lately. -FASTILY (TALK) 02:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled&oldid=356376042"