Jump to content

User talk:Bduke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sbo (talk | contribs) at 13:33, 4 May 2010 (→‎CC/QC wiki: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Home   Talk   Articles   Barnstars   eMail   Contributions   Workshop   Images  


Welcome to my talk page.
Click here to leave a new message at the end.
You will be asked for a subject also.
Alternatively, you can add your message at the end of the appropriate section listed in the index below.
House Rules
  1. I will respond to a post you make here on this page.
  2. If I post on your talk page please respond there to make coherent discussions in one spot.
  3. Reply to comments using a colon(:) before the post.
Archives
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived.

Additional links to other survival types

Please link in Lofty Wiseman, British Survival Expert. The list is essentially incomplete without him :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevemarvell (talkcontribs)

What list. I have no idea what this is about. --Bduke (Discussion) 10:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've got it covered.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevemarvell (talkcontribs)
Got what covered? I still have no idea what you are talking about. If you are not prepared to be clear, why did you come here? --Bduke (Discussion) 21:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:218.185.54.44

The content is pretty harmless, but it is becoming somewhat disruptive. I'd probably go for a block of months if there is a recurrence, given that we try to avoid indef blocks for IPs. Melburnian (talk) 01:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that sounds good. Melburnian (talk) 03:15, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Richard Dawkins

Hi, regarding this edit of yours, this source asserts that Dawkins was referring to Benedict not Pius, on the grounds that the Pope Nazi comment was made in the context of remarks about the canonisation of Mary MacKillop. Do you have a source that says otherwise? The reporting of the conference does seem to be a little haphazard... Hadrian89 (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


To Brian

Brian, in proofreading I found an error in my Figure 3. It may seem minor but the text refers to three resonance structures B, C and D. These arranged vertically but the bottom one is not labeled and the structure on the far right is labeled D in error.

The corrected drawing has the structure on the right labeled E now and the bottom of the three vertical structures is properly labeled D.

I have uploaded the corrected structure which is in Commons. The Birch file has the old Figure 3 but it has the same label. Ordinarily I think that would bring ..gif figure into the article. But I don't know how to get the corrected drawing in to replace the old one. Both the old one and the new one have the same designations,namely Fig 3 Cyclohexadienyl Anion.gif

I afraid of spoiling what is almost perfect. Thus can you help. I'll send the same request via E-mail. I wouuld ask Chzz to do this but I believe that you were the one who helped with drawings originally and asking two persons to help with the same drawing might lead to a problem.

Best, Howard Howard E. Zimmerman 22:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC) --Howard E. Zimmerman 22:53, 19 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hezimmerman (talkcontribs)

Deletion nomination of File:(2) Birch-Benzoic.gif

blanked page
blanked page

Hi Bduke, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding . You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{db-author}}. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{db-author}} tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=FrescoBot}} somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot (msg) 05:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday?

71? You don't seem it! I would have guessed 50something. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 10:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CC/QC wiki

Hello,

I am contacting you to ask your advice on an effort toward collecting and reorganizing material from Wikipedia and the web, to create a wiki aimed at computational/quantum chemistry. Differently from wikipedia, this wiki will include original research and more obscure arguments, and will present the arguments with a more aimed focus. I would kindly ask your opinion on this, since I am sure you probably are aware of previous or current attempts on this regard. I tried to look for something similar, but without success. My feeling is that the quantum chemists/computational chemistry community is still very fragmented, in particular when it comes to training and dissemination. The website is here. A friend of mine is the author and in charge for p4VASP, hosted on the site, so we have traffic. We were also thinking about a Q/A or forum, and the wiki, as said. In addition, some software is developed under the same name. A bazaar launchpad is available. Everything has just started, and we are trying to make it scale up, even if it stays a spare time activity, we want to give something useful.

Thanks, Stefano Borini, munehiro (talk) 13:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]