User talk:VTomi

Adoption

Hello, VTomi, I'm Airplaneman. I am willing to adopt you, if you'd like! Please contact me if you want to accept/not accept. Regards, Airplaneman ^talk 00:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have adopted you! :). I look forward to working with you. Before we get into details, is there anything you would like to know right away? Regards, Airplaneman ^talk 20:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP

Re this, [1], don't make silly comments like that, people don't get criminal records for things like that--Jac16888 ^Talk 23:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lol, sorry. IT is my mate you see. He has an obbsesion with William Gallas. Thank you VTomi (talk)

well tell him to stop. And no offence, but this is not going to pass, you simply don't have the experience right now, and you don't need to be and admin to fix grammar--Jac16888 ^Talk 23:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Figured it wouldn't pass, worth a try. Also, My mate is creating a user to edit with now. Keep an eye on the William Gallas page. Thank You VTomi (talk) 23:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. As your adopter, it's my obligation to guide you on the Wiki. Stop. Wikipedia isn't a playground. It doesn't mean you can't have fun, but the type of fun you seem to be having isn't for this place. (See what the people warned you about above.) Please contact me if you have any questions :). Thanks, Airplaneman ^talk 01:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since it is obvious that you intend to continue vandalizing, I'm reporting you to the vandalism noticeboard. Although you may have a few constructive edits, your continued vandalism will not be tolerated. Airplaneman ✈ 20:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:25, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ALI ^{nom nom} 14:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

If you continue to make disruptive edits like this you will be blocked from editing. Crystal Clear x3 21:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 21:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

VTomi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because made one small edit and I received a number of warning by many different people, then some blockd me. It all happend over night and dident even have chance to read the warnings.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Because  made one small edit and I received a number of warning by many different people, then some blockd me. It all happend over night and dident even have chance to read the warnings. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Because  made one small edit and I received a number of warning by many different people, then some blockd me. It all happend over night and dident even have chance to read the warnings. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Because  made one small edit and I received a number of warning by many different people, then some blockd me. It all happend over night and dident even have chance to read the warnings. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}