User talk:Tide rolls
![]() | To Leave a New Message Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks. |
![]() | If you feel that I have reverted an edit or issued a warning in error, please click here and let me know. I am human, and I do make mistakes. Please don't interpret an error on my part as a personal attack on you. It's not, I promise. I ask you to simply bring it to my attention; I am always open to civil discussion. (I will respond on my talk page unless you specify otherwise.) Thank you. |
Template:Archive box collapsible
Hi Tiderolls!
Hi tide rolls! Remember me? I have learned more wikipedia rules. I learned: No Vandalism, No Disruptive Edits, No Unconstructive Edits, and a few more. Can you help me with something? I tried making it a few times but I had problems.Beamer103 17:17, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Help with what? Tiderolls 17:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up this mess. Aren't these kids ingenious? I've requested protection at WP:RFPP, do you think it's worth being locked? East of Borschov 09:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- The mischief seems to have been short lived. I'll keep an eye on the article and if the disruption continues with no action on your report, I'll take care of it. See ya 'round Tiderolls 12:45, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Uninvolved admin
Hi, just wondered if you would take a look at user LarkinToad2010, as an uninvolved admin, and see if a short block is appropriate or give some words of wisdom for the user. There is on going ownership of articles that they are editing and I have been contacted directly about a possible block but feel that I am too involved to act. You can see the user's talk page for the interaction and then the comments on talk:Theresa May. Thanks Keith D (talk) 01:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- IMO LarkinToad2010's editing is pushing towards disruptive but I think a block at this point would be counterproductive. The thread on the user's talk page containing the "final warning" was a week ago and, although their tone is abrasive and confrontational, they have been using article and user talk pages. I find some hope in that. I'll message them and offer editorial assistance (such that I have to offer) and perhaps LarkinToad2010 will find their "Wiki-legs". I hope that you don't find my analysis unsound or weak. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to have a look. I have been trying to hold back, hoping to get them to change and co-operate with the community, rather than wading in with a block. I was away when the warnings were issued on the user's talk page and dropped them a message when I returned after getting e-mail over the problems. Keith D (talk) 08:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- I do understand. I hope that the user chooses to hear the message. Tiderolls 10:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment I would have thought a short block, of at least 7 days, was justified to allow LarkinToad2010 time to sit back and reflect on the seriousness of his incivility and accusations of Keith D being a troll, see this diff:- [1] (Note the editor has been blocked, for 48 hours, previously for disruptive editing, when using one of his many sockpuppets, see:- 86.161.54.220). He also has a predisposition to label other editor's changes to his edits as vandalism, plus a growing tendency to ‘ownership’ of articles. Note the comment he made on Noq's talk Page. I have also warned him twice about incivility on the Larkin 25 talk page, due to his labelling of other editors changes to his work as vandalism. There is also an amount of incivility from him on the Kingston upon Hull talk page.
- I am not saying that LarkinToad2010 is due some leniency that is not available to all editors. It appears to me that this user is not familiar with how tasks are best accomplished here and most likely is projecting their frustration instead of taking responsibility for their actions. I invite anyone that feels my approach is incorrect to post their concerns at the incidents noticeboard to obtain more feedback. I would welcome any input. Thanks Tiderolls 16:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Toffee apple
Nope, although the use there is a derivative copyright; I normally use it to refer to Prodego (who is, surprisingly, an admin - one who makes the others look all sweetness and light/anarchist-y/delete as applicable). Ironholds (talk) 03:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Intrusion to my edits
Mate, please stop reverting my edits. It is getting very irritating and no valid reason is provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.183.27 (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- A valid reason was provided, mate. Also, I've posted a message to your talk page. Regards Tiderolls 21:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Mate, why are you doing this
Mate, I do not appreciate your disruptive reverts. It is getting annoying and I will not tolerate this any more. Please stop asap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.183.27 (talk) 21:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- You've made your frustration clear previously. There's no need to restate the fact. I'm telling you that opinion and commentary are not to be inserted into the article mainspace. To continue to do so is disruptive. If you continue, you will be blocked. Please stop. Tiderolls 21:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Jamie Elle
I've discussed about it with her. She said the words after the 200th film. Skitut Master (talk) 22:17, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Interesting, but (if true) represents original research and cannot be used to support article content. Regards Tiderolls 22:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the interesting word. Thank you so much for the information. I hope my contribution wasn't a sin for Wikipedia. Skitut Master (talk) 22:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Please be very careful regarding the changes you make to biographies of living persons. It is one of the most watched over aspects of this project for obvious reasons. Regards Tiderolls 22:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
My user page
Many thanks. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 22:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
- Glad to help. Thanks for letting me know it was ok to butt in. See ya 'round Tiderolls 22:29, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
nick revell
had a message apparently about editing this guys page....confident its not me as I haven't edited any pages on wiki so can only imagine this was sent in error.
cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.53.182 (talk) 18:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- It's entirely possible you didn't make the edit in question. However, if you look here you will see that someone from your IP address did make the edit. These types of misunderstandings are easily avoidable by registering an account. Thanks for your polite message. Tiderolls 20:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Uknown American Presidents Task Force?
Hi Tide rolls! I am thinking about starting an "Unknown Presidents" task force and I noticed that you are an active contributor at WP:USPREZ articles. I was wondering if you would like to join me in starting this task force. The following Presidents would be included:
- Millard Fillmore
- James Monroe
- Zachary Taylor
- Franklin Pierce
- Rutherford B Hayes
- James Garfield
- Chester A Arthur
- James Buchanan
Our Mission: To expand the knowledge of the "Unknown Presidents." Specifically getting all these articles to GA class or higher. Let me know what you think. Thanks!--Schwindtd (talk) 01:21, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- An admirable goal, to be sure. I'm a bit occupied with other tasks presently and would not be able to furnish the attention your proposition deserves. As time permits I'll be glad to check in and help where I'm able. Thanks for inviting me and thanks for all your hard work Tiderolls 04:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank semi-spam
Thanks for your support in my RfA, which was closed as successful. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 15:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Dean Winters
Aw come on man! Put it back up, it was all in good fun! I love Dean Winters, I am sure he would have gotten a kick out of it. LOL
Its all good tho. You have a job to do, and I respect that.
Wait forgot to sign 71.127.176.186 (talk) 00:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
But you know it was semi-funny! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.176.186 (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
not unconstructive
that was not unconstructive —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.62.157.176 (talk) 23:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
Bye
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Choco_chip_cookie.png/100px-Choco_chip_cookie.png)
Dffgd has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of dffgd at 20:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC).
Hi Tideroles.
Hi Tideroles, this is a message considering your edit to the cloning section.
I have repeatidly edited the "Human" cloning section. Not only is this section of the cloning page EXACTLY the same as the pig section, no humans have been cloned as of yet, and no human organic material was used in the cloning of pigs. Therefore no humans have been cloned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.250.125 (talk) 01:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- My edit? You mean the edit from November '09? I do not see where I have had any input regarding your edits to List of animals that have been cloned. I will oblige you here, though. This is a list of animals that have been cloned. I fail to see how including any that have not been cloned is relevant. If I'm mistaken about which article you refer to, or which edit you refer to then, please, take the time to be more clear. Regards Tiderolls 02:26, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
??
Who are you? I am new to Wikipedia. Can you teach me the basics of Wikipedia? Honorboy123 (talk) 01:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)