Talk:Chakra

Chakras are Like Soul or dense conscious space within human, but It can not be proved

There is no way to Prove them, at least in present time. They are definitely there but is not confined to the perception of human mind. They are neither a substance, nor anatomical part, nor anything which can be conceived worldly. They can be perceived privately but then that perception can noway be given. No way be proved. When Chakras are rose and become more vibrant then there are emotional changes comes apparently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.227.10 (talk) 05:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

qigong

i flagged this section as self-contradictory, because it seems to first state that meridians are equivalent to nadis, and then goes on to proclaim the similarities "superficial". (i also believe prana and qi to be commonly regarded as more or less referring to the same thing.) the third (unsourced?) paragraph overall seems a bit POV, although the info on differences in the systems is of value to the article. k kisses 19:12, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

There is no need to flag this section as contradictory, just to rewrite it to reflect the equivalency of both systems. Within the Reiki system both, (the original?) Indian Prana/Chakra and the Chinese Taoist Meridian, systems of esoteric psycho-neuro-physiology, have been perfectly synchronized together, and establish a "united universal" esoteric psycho-neuro-physiological system. 96.246.55.35 (talk) 08:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC) Kaye Sunday, Aug. 1, 2010

deleted bits

"Unique interpretation of the chakras system model is presented in the form of Sacred geometry or spiritual symbols of ancient India and Egypt. It's Ankh model of chakras system.

Some elements are made from metals: aluminum, copper, brass, iron, zinc, and cupronickel. Elements in the shape of spheres are established from color glass, stone, ceramics, amber, turquoise, corals and different crystal: amethyst, azurite and nephrite.

Such known elements as ida, pingala, sushumna and chakras are presented in model (step 1). Additionally elements are established on the model (step 2), in the form of a layer of spheres from amber, corals, turquoise, quartz, color glass, pearls, ceramics, onyx, malachite, nephrite, amethyst, and azurite."

didn't seem too relevant, so i took it out. k kisses 20:45, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Reality check

Perhaps a section explaining that chakras have "no proven relationship with the anatomy or physiology of the human body."?[1]

More to the point, chakras have no proven basis in reality (i.e. there's no proof that they exist). Personally, I think the concept is just a bunch of superstitious malarkey. It's rather unhealthy (and unencyclopedic) that the article doesn't express any skepticism along these lines. If I were to write a "criticism" section, I'm pretty sure that it would be deleted by dogmatic ideologues. Fuzzform (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

"Element of FIction"

"This article describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style (January 2011)" This is vandalism, some kind of childish joke and should be removed. If it in any way made sense you would have to place this same "fiction" accusation on hundreds of thousands of pages for any human concept that doesn't relate directly to an observable physical object. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crucialfelix (talk • contribs) 10:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)