Jump to content

User talk:Longhair

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Emedlin1 (talk | contribs) at 21:24, 25 February 2011 (→‎Why was the GDATA Software page deleted?: Plan to recreate....). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I'm unsure why you have deleted xtranormal. It is a phenomenon in North America -- that famous Iphone 4 v. Android video was made with the software, and I wanted to learn more about it. Now it is gone. That doesn't seem right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.3.242.71 (talk) 04:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm the creator of the article Jorge Bechara. I knew an article with the same name was previously deleted but I couldn't access how it was and I don't know how it could breach copyright as I wrote the information myself based on material searched from books, print and online credible sources, as noted in the article reference section. I'd like to know what could be done for it to stay. Thank you. --Hiedler (talk) 03:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


why did you delete isabella parkin's wikipedia page? Ronnieparkin (talk) 08:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Clear app messenger.png
Talk

___________________________________


This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 8 days are automatically archived to User talk:Longhair/Archive20.
/Archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Editing Barnstar

100,000 Edits
I, Bugboy52.4, award you for reaching 100,000 edits according to the List of Wikipedians by number of edits generated 11:45 pm, 24 February 2009. Keep up the good work!________________________________________________________________

Replaceable fair use File:Pauldenyer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pauldenyer.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the GDATA Software page deleted?

GDATA is one of the most prominent names in the anti-malware world. They are reviewed by every major independent antivirus testing organization including av comparatives, Virus Bulletin, west coast labs, ICSA, etc. And they have the highest detection rate over the last several years according to several of those labs. They also have a significant install base.

If you can justify deleting GDATA, then you might as well delete at least half a dozen other anti-malware vendors. All of whom are less significant than GDATA in almost all respects. Deleting GDATA screams of ignorance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cabville (talkcontribs) 11:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to recreate G Data Software page

I am planning to recreate the G Data page as information about the antivirus software is very notable. They have won multiple awards, are one of the oldest computing security companies and have been comparably tested against much of the software on the List_of_antivirus_software. I will be putting the draft on my user page User:Emedlin1/G_Data and then moving to main. Please comment so I won't waste time trying to publish an article that will be deleted. Thank you -- emedlin (talk) 21:24, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Joekorp.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Joekorp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:30, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maria Korp.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Maria Korp.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-creating the article for the Rancid song "Nihilism"

Hi, I was going to make an article for the Rancid song "Nihilism", and I saw that it said you had deleted an article already made for it because of not enough information. And it said that I should ask you before re-creating it. So can I re-create the article? I might not have enough information about the song right now but I will find more as time goes on. So if the article doesn't have enough information (if) I first make the article, don't delete it quite yet. :) --Blaguymonkey (talk) 10:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]