User talk:Longhair/Archive16

SmileyAward

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.247.166.31 (talk • contribs)

Thank you for the support on the Tiffany Limos page. Jaynekennedy 16:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potiential Banning

Hi, if i were banned, re: last warning message, how long would my ban last?

would i be able to edit in future? Yes i clearly make some poor choices in my editing style, often applying create licence to topical issues, however, occasionally i do post something that is quite legitimate and indeed credible. So, lets just say i am currently having a hormonal lapse in judgement... would my actions of late lead to a permanent ban, curbing the career of a genius? or a temporary ban.. just long enough for me to cool off a bit?

your response would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiGremlin (talk • contribs)

deletion of 'pisschrist' page

i wish question the deletion of this page, as pisschrist the band has toured south-east asia. and under the notable band guidlines: "Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country." i believe the page should therefore be able to remain.

QXZ-Ads

Hello Longhair, I am HB4026, and User:VirtualSteve, User: Sarah and I (who are all members of WP:Australia) were wondering if it is a good idea if we place an advertisment on qxz-ads to attract new members. With the advice of User:Sarah we thought that we should run it through you because you are the 'big cheese' in WP: Australia. Do you think it is feasable? Harrison-HB4026 09:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for responding to my request. I have already placed a note on the WP:AUS talk page. I also asked User: Sarah (Who I know you are familiar with) and another user, and Sarah said that we would really only need to ask you. Harrison-HB4026 02:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Longhair. Have you got any ideas regarding the banner for the ad? Harrison-HB4026 06:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Townsville Wikiproject

Hi Longhair, thanks for your help with wikiproject Townsville, could you tell me why articles which have been assessed for their importance to Wikiproject Australia do not automatically go into the appropriate cat under Wikiproject Townsville rating, at the moment all articles have automatically gone into the "none" importance cat. Thanks, 12:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

THANK YOU!!!! That answered my next question too :D Wiki Townsvillia n 12:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Veterans of the First World War

NO Thank you for changing "Veterans of the First World War who died in 2007" to "List of". Actually, it's NOT a list. A list organizes things in an order such as numerical ranking or alphabetical order. Rather, it's a compilation of tables. Also, even if it was a 'list' isn't that inferred? No need to be so banal and just make Wikipedia more bloated. The key word should be "Veterans", not "List."R Young {^yakÅ_talk} 09:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Template:pnc nominated for deletion

See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:pnc for the discussion, which will certainly spill over into larger issues. Your thoughts would be appreciated. --Kevin Murray 23:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Deletion of Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australian crime

Hello. I am currently involved in an effort to make the Wikipedia deletion sorting project and process more accessible and efficient. I recently encountered the deletion sorting page noted above, which you created in June 2006. I believe that the page is overly specific and of limited utility, and ought to be deleted. If you agree with my assessment, would you please tag the article with {{db-author}} or, as you are an admin, just delete it yourself? If you do not agree, would you please let me know why? Thanks, Black Falcon 06:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Hollway

I noticed that you added the unreferenced tag to this article. I'm just curious as to what exactly it is you feel needs referencing? It doesn't bother me as I didn't actually write the article in the first place, but I'm currently researching Hollway and I could almost certainly find whatever references are needed.Teiresias84 09:33, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's the prob w/ the Hummus?

I went through the article awhile ago and added a bunch of references, what more do you want added? I'm perfectly willing to cite sources if you could tell me what you disagree with. Trcunning 09:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image tagging for Image:IdaBagusWiswantanu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IdaBagusWiswantanu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Motto of the day

Have a look at this. (Mine is the 'You Can Do It!' one). Do you think it is Motto of the Day Material? If you do could you support it for me but if you don't I want you to oppose it. Thanks Harrison-HB4026 02:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

QXZ-ads

Ok thanks for the ideas. I think that we should start finalising this so we should start getting the ideas that would really work. Harrison-HB4026 23:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of your suggestions. Without everyone helping out, my campaign would have not been as successful. Thanks Harrison-HB4026 03:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repairs

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you. MojoTas 00:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Lists

Hi Longhair, if you can, could you please add a lists column to the Townsville articles by quality statistics template and add it to the bot's program for automatic updates? Thanks, Wiki Townsvillia n 08:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. Wiki Townsvillia n 01:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are getting another email in a few minutes, sigh Satu Suro 03:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your response, sorry to keep the tally up :) Satu Suro 03:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC) Those darlington arts, hahahah that location was the centre of my universe for close to too many years I dare think about - live further east now - lots more frogs over this way (4 legged) Satu Suro 12:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scratchpad

Hi Longhair. Please feel free to use my new scratchpad for experimenting. Harrison-HB4026 09:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

Is there a way to view unassessed articles by importance? For example I'd like to crack the 70 or so high, mid and low unassessed Australian articles. Here's hoping there's an obvious way I've missed! Any other tricks and tips? Thanks --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 03:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. One more question. For consistency, are we classifying all lists as class=List, which auto generates importance=NA? --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 04:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Gridiron in Australia

Hey mate thanks for moving this WP into the WP Australia template. Looks great! Bren ^talk 07:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Lists

Hi Longhair, if you can, could you please add a lists column to the Townsville articles by quality statistics template and add it to the bot's program for automatic updates? Thanks, Wiki Townsvillia n 08:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. Wiki Townsvillia n 01:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are getting another email in a few minutes, sigh Satu Suro 03:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your response, sorry to keep the tally up :) Satu Suro 03:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC) Those darlington arts, hahahah that location was the centre of my universe for close to too many years I dare think about - live further east now - lots more frogs over this way (4 legged) Satu Suro 12:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scratchpad

Hi Longhair. Please feel free to use my new scratchpad for experimenting. Harrison-HB4026 09:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

Is there a way to view unassessed articles by importance? For example I'd like to crack the 70 or so high, mid and low unassessed Australian articles. Here's hoping there's an obvious way I've missed! Any other tricks and tips? Thanks --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 03:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. One more question. For consistency, are we classifying all lists as class=List, which auto generates importance=NA? --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 04:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Gridiron in Australia

Hey mate thanks for moving this WP into the WP Australia template. Looks great! Bren ^talk 07:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Jane Thurgood-Dove

Hi Longhair, I wonder if you wouldn't mind having a look at this article as part of the crime series. It is unsourced and appears to deal in rumours. I know the shooting got a lot of attention in Melbourne but how notable is it really? I am unsure whether to clean it up or nominate for deletion. Cheers, Mattinbgn/^talk 07:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt just removed the prod I put on the article... the article really is a bit sad, and I've got no interest in improving it but at the moment it looks like a sad memorial. Is there any WP - Aust Crime or WP - Melbourne interest in improving the article?Ga rr ie 04:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ronbakir.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ronbakir.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. âAn gr 17:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SimonDeering.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SimonDeering.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. âAn gr 17:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Megmorrison.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Megmorrison.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. âAn gr 17:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

No References

You tagged my page on Kim's cabin as not using references...how does one reference when a person is using only their memory and information from a few postcards that Wikipedia refuses to post?? The problem is there are no web references to cite...I am perplexed...I was hoping this story would get additional information from other users...I drove to the locations to see what was there now...how do I document that?? I could cite aerial photos from google, but they would be removed as copyright violation...

hey how do i email you? send me your real email to my myspace and i will get it.

myspace.com/officialfanoftiffanylimos Tiffanylimos 20:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Umm

As long as it isnt punitive - you might wish to chastise criticise or simply re-arrange my starting up a northern territory wikiproject - I am learning that there is more to it than i expected - any clues would be appreciated re correct links and titles and things. In discussion with cj and riana - this project is being setup to standardise NT arts and subjects more than expectting massive involvement Satu Suro 04:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a good idea personally. What should we do with regard to tagging articles now that it's basically up? (I think it will be the usual three-four-editor-driven affair, but at least NT gets its own system) Orderinchaos 09:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See you are in there already - it all just seemed to happen - an idea on a talk one night, and there the next day a project up and running, umm... Satu Suro 03:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry for my foolish edits on wikipedia. It wont happen again, i now do good edits. 203.208.92.162 01:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Our friend is back

Also posted the following to WP:AIV - For your info... *203.54.186.30 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - This IP is in fact a sockpuppet of User:Rosinaharris (aka Banned Gundagai Editor) and commenced vandalising again at Coolac, New South Wales--VS ^talk 11:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done - whacked by user:Cyberjunkie--VS ^talk 12:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mohammed_Bijeh_BBC_image.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Mohammed_Bijeh_BBC_image.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 14:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:David hicks.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:David hicks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Mohammed_Bijeh_BBC_image.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mohammed_Bijeh_BBC_image.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you are off

And cj is more or less as well - wondering if you could drop a hint when youre back so you can be hassled with internal workings of setting up the assessment pages of the new Oz lit project - would appreccite any help when you are running and up again - cheers Satu Suro 08:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bradleyjohnmuroch abctv.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bradleyjohnmuroch abctv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TrilogyofTerror dvdcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TrilogyofTerror dvdcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:BristolLogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BristolLogo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Image:Kmkshot.jpg

Hello, Longhair. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Kmkshot.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Longhair/Archive7. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 16:54, 16 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Darrell-Lea logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Darrell-Lea logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot)} 18:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Darrell-Lea logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Darrell-Lea logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot)} 18:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Cripes

Its been a long time not seeing your good work on my watchlist - welcome back - a lot has happened! well sort of. The to do page in The new Oz lit project seems to be incorrectly built/or connected - could you be so kind as to have a squizz please? Thanks and welcome back Satu Suro 09:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try to edit that page and -

No such section
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

You tried to edit a section that doesn't exist. Since there is no section 3, there's no place to save your edit.

Return to Template:Todo.

My suspicion is that the categories at bottom show that the to do thingo is in wikipedia space and not the project space - I would prefer your judgement and action rather than trying to eliminate the to do connection myself :) Satu Suro 09:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops dads taxi service - will try to check and get back to you in a few hours (or less) Satu Suro 10:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW is the NT=yes looks ok - just wait till there's a real push on literature=yes - my suspicion is there are a weird and wonderful range out there needing to be pulled in! Gotta go Satu Suro 10:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Franklins logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Franklins logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot)} 21:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Franklins logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Franklins logo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk â¢ contribs â¢ Bot)} 21:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Cleanups

Yeah, I think WikiProject Australia more broadly has its biggest cleanup ever happening in little bits all over the place. It's definitely a positive development :) WP:VIC is a bit like WP:WA and WP:NT in that it covers new ground, which is great - so now it's just a matter of running all over the Wiki tagging things. I think some of the smaller/inactive Wikiprojects need to be reexamined and possibly integrated, I have some ideas on this but they're probably controversial. Orderinchaos 07:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW I've just replaced all the old Hobart tags with Tasmania. Is there a way to check using categories if there are any remaining? Orderinchaos 10:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. BTW I brought Outback NSW back from the dead and renamed it NSW, might have to look at getting that to go live soon. Orderinchaos 11:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It amazing what putting off uni essays can do for the project :P Satu Suro 13:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Long beer

Or coffee, or orange juice or tea whatever over the vast array of underpop Oz cats - what to do how to do it and with what level of opacity so to speak :) Satu Suro 09:32, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What cats are we referring to? Orderinchaos 09:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Underpopulated_Australia_categories. I'll find the other ones I make mention of at SatuSuro's talk page shortly. -- Longhair\^talk 09:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The by electorate ones are silly - especially as the electorate boundaries keep changing (it's a bit different to, say, mayors of an LGA). I ask what value such a categorisation has that a list under the electorate article would not provide. Orderinchaos 09:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW I am glad you two seem to have interlinking watches on each of our talk pages - it is a reassuring phenomenon that ones transgressions are being clearly viewed by those trusted with GF and reliability.

Back to the issue - if 0- 5 level population cats are considered as potential targets - who/how /what are the reduced target cats to replace - take for eg my comment to knobbly a few minutes ago - if all the tas subcats (or any project for that matter) are underpop'ed and show no sign of expanding - presumably the arts regress to the broader cat of tas - however, what concerns me in all projects (including indonesia and jakarta as the worst case scenario I have met so far) there are obviously expandable cats but there are no new arts being put in in recent times... I was under the impression that 20 or 30 minimum to escape the scrutiny of the keen to delete mob is part of the us cat delete army (hi ho silver!) trumpet call... Satu Suro 10:03, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re overcategorisation - tell me i have tagged a few by now!Satu Suro 10:11, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guess what!

		The Australian Barnstar of National Merit
		For starting the Australia WikiProject, you definitely deserve this (which, incidentally, was created as part of the project). Use it well! G1 gg y ! 03:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pkr-80-80.jpg

I have tagged Image:Pkr-80-80.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Its good

To see the watchlist lightup again with your good work! Like old times :) Satu Suro 12:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Local perth admins seeem to be off - I hope I have caught you - what would you do with the ti-tree ed? ignore? Satu Suro 13:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Richardson

Hi, Longhair.

I am curious to know, since no comments were left, why this article was rated start class. Yes, it's a short article. There are not a lot of written resources about Wendy Richardson, and personal research is not permitted here. The article covers:

Potted biography. Greater detail of her personal life are not necessary.
How she began writing.
Background to her major work Windy Gully .
Where and when her plays were produced.
How they were received
What makes her plays good for performance.
The scope of her work.
Five quotations of what others have said about Richardson and what she says about herself.
A list of her works and whether they have been published.
Her awards.
References are cited.
Links work
Pictures are good.

The article is grammatically correct, properly spelt, has been OK'd by Wendy for publication and is the envy of other local writers.

What more do you want from a short article about a living person?

--Amandajm 13:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brigades of the New South Wales Rural Fire Service

I think your rating of this article as "start class" is unwarranted, for the simple reason that it no longer exists; it has been merged with New South Wales Rural Fire Service. Someone should delete the talk page. Brianyoumans 17:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biodiesel

I removed your table of VW vehicles that can run on biodiesel. Like I'm sure you know, practically all diesel vehicles can ran on biodiesel. Singling out VW and displaying a table of their vehicles amounts to an advertisement for VW, which is not an appropriate use for Wikipedia.

Edit Count

The edit count tool you are using is offline apparently - Mike Beckham 07:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Cheers for the rollback, Longhair. It's nice to see you on deck -- I haven't seen you around for ages! Hope all is well, Sarah 13:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable?

Hey, sorry I just saw that you had deleted a page, so I figure your an admin - and I was wondering if you had time could you take a look at this and decide whether it should be deleted or not. I was going to put a speedy tag up - but I noticed that a different editor had edited the talk page, and I wasn't sure which speedy to put on there. Sorry for bothering you like this, it just seemed kinda sketch. Thanks for your time --daniel folsom 23:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks - I was just worried it might have violated WP:Not for the collection of info, but I'll absolutely run it by them. Again, really sorry to bother you - for how long I've been on WP I am definitley supposed to be able to do this on my own, there's really no excuse, but thanks for helping me out, I really appreciate it.daniel folsom 23:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

heheh

good to see youve located some old loose links of my million threads (50s and sixties)so easily there just then, cheers Satu Suro 04:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC) there is the material - will try fix it up a bit before i have to get off - one of the thousand embarrasments of the ten deaths of the loose editor with too many threads :) Satu Suro [reply]

Phonetrace.org

If you reply to this, please do it on my page. Anyway, why did you delete my article of phonetrace.org? The entire thing was true, so what's wrong with it? I did verify with a source as well. Wwefan980 15:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes users can change that page so how am I supposed to consider those rules? Wwefan980 01:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying in a respectful manner. Would you want to create that article then? I think people should know about it. It's a sick joke. Wwefan980 05:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help with images

Can you help? I want my image on my page rotaed to the upright position, but I don't know how to. It was right way up when I uploaded it. Urgeback 05:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Thanks a ton Urgeback 07:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage revert

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my userpage. The IP's comment (of course I couldn't help looking) was odd, inasmuch as I've been teased by other admins for being slower to block people that just about anyone around.... Regards, Newyorkbrad 00:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks revert reply

You're very welcome - that particular vandal has now been blocked ;-) Lra drama 08:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good work :-) Lra drama 08:53, 4 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Talk:Victorian Rogaining Association

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Talk:Victorian Rogaining Association, by Maelgwn, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Talk:Victorian Rogaining Association fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Talk page for a redirect

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Talk:Victorian Rogaining Association, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Talk:Victorian Rogaining Association itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Vet Sci

If you have the odd moment - could you look inside the WP Vet Med project template to see if the thingymijiggy that points NA arts to the NA cat doesnt include the general arts collection cat as well? A big ask I realise - but theres something odd looking at Vet Med arts - and all it has is cats in there (the puns can be quite a dog) Satu Suro 03:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC) To be very sure of what I see I will put the links here in a moment. Satu Suro 03:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk:Veterinary medicine stubs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is supported by the Veterinary medicine WikiProject.

This project provides a central approach to Veterinary medicine-re:lated subjects on Wikipedia.

Please participate by editing, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.

NA This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the quality scale.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Veterinary_medicine_stubs"

Categories: Veterinary medicine stubs | Non-article Veterinary medicine pages | WikiProject Veterinary medicine articles

My guess there is coding that drags the NA cats into the third cat on the last line above - WP Vet med arts - when it probably shouldnt do that. My hunch Satu Suro 04:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not criticising the hard work of warlord john carter to fix things - I'm probably a little too keen to get the NA part up and running and I keep noticing things - thanks for your help (as always) Satu Suro 04:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delay

Sorry real life got in the way today - will try to check template tonight WA time - apologies Satu Suro 08:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed.

I'm having issues with 2 users of Wikipedia who clam I've violate copyright on Image_talk:Wagga-railway-station.jpg. I will be at work for the rest of the week and my not have a chance to respond. -- Bidgee 00:49, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WP Australia

Just thought I'd mention that the documentation hasn't been updated for the above template to include the music modifications you've just made. Thewinchester ^(talk) 05:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kerangdisaster

Your right. It was off one of the news sites so you can delete it. I thought you could still upload it. Sorry. Chicken-7 07:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Australian music articles by quality statistics

I did. see my post on the template talk page. —Moondyne 10:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Stems

Am having a slight problem with another user BigrTex who considers that the fair use images of the various Stems anthology albums are "decorative" and therefore not allowed - do you know whether this is correct? If not how can I get him to stop removing them Dan arndt 00:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If that is the case then why did he remove the image relating to the Stems album - which also has a link to an article on the album? Dan arndt 00:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have taken note of your comments & am creating articles on each of the albums - appreciate your advice as I'm not so familiar with all the aspects of editing on Wikipedia Dan arndt 01:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's easy to be caught out. Things have always been this way, but it's only of late that the rules are being enforced as such :) -- Longhair\^talk 01:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more into researching the information as opposed to how the information is displayed & sometimes the niceties of all these rules frustrate the hell out of me - appreciate it if you keep me on the straight and narrow Dan arndt 01:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

I reverted the changes you made to the article June 2007. As practiced in all month articles, the 'future scheduled events' are removed as the dates go by and are replaced by the Portal:Current events dates. It appears to be an honest mistake and could easily appear as vandalism by an anon-IP. Just thought I'd let you know if you run into a similar case in the future. I like the layout of your talk page btw. Mkdw ^talk 05:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Dear Longhair, thank you for you efforts to build consensus on my RfA. As you know, it was unsuccessful. I am not the type of editor to be disheartened by such a result, and have gained much experience.

I will run again, however I am concerned that I may see your name in the same place, for the same reasons. I would greatly appreciate knowing what I could do to earn your support next time.

If you have anything to contribute by way of improvements or comments, please donât hesitate to tell me. Kind regards, Dfrg.msc 00:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nswpheonix

Thank you for blocking User:Nswpheonix. I attempted to revert his edit on the Australian PM (sorry, i forget his name...John Howard perhaps?) but you beat me to it. I did get to revert his edit on Wikipedia, and then saw he edited John Howard again with a comment to you. Good work on blocking him. Jru Gordon 08:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I only get to be online about once a week, but I spend alot of that time watching Recent changes for vandalism. I really have no use for it. Jru Gordon 08:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Glommysquor33

Hi there Longhair, I was hoping you, as an admin, could shut down User:Glommysquor33 - it's replacing pictures with ones of the male appendage. Even did it to the featured article a few minutes ago. Thanks, Rob Lindsey 10:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry mate - sorted! Thanks anyway. :) Rob Lindsey 10:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the talkpage revert today, appreciate it :) Take care, Riana â 10:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Glad you liked it :) Riana â 10:31, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

R-Expo Repeated Vandalism

Dear Sir This is to inform you that R-Expo Article has again been vandalised.. please take necessary actions. Thanking you Sanchitm 18:01, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted my page?

hello

im new to Wiki and decided to create my first article. it was deleted within minutes, I didnt even finish editing th internal links.

why was this deleted? there was no reference to a business or anything just a guide on how to look after a stove?

any advice would be much appreciated

thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodburner Warehouse (talk • contribs)

R-Expo Vandalism

Dear Sir Someone from the IP Address: 86.32.112.6 is trying to repeatedly vandalise the article 'R-Expo'. I would request you to please take necessary measures to block the above mentioned IP Address.. thanking you regards Sanchit —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanchitm (talk • contribs)

Thankyou so much sir. I am a little new to wikipedia. I guess this is the right way to send messages. ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanchitm (talk • contribs)

Deletion - Star Trek: A Call To Duty

Good Morning. I would like to post my rebuttal for the reason listed for the deletion of this entry. Listed reason: an article about a web site, blog, online forum, webcomic, podcast, or similar web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject rebuttal:

The subject (Star Trek: A Call To Duty) is significant in the gaming history of this franchise in that it was the first online organization authorized by Paramount Pictures.
The subject is already mentioned under the entry Star Trek games role-playing section, and in the main article Star Trek (role-playing game)
A similar entry is in existance about the second official Paramount run gaming organization (Star Trek Simulation Forum) {a poor argument, I know. "They have one, why can't I?"'}

If it is an issue about the listing of the fleet roster, I will be happy to delete that section, leaving only the history of the organization. Waiting on your response--Letum 14:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

thought - on template options

{{WP Australia}} I was doing some awb on the category:Unknown-importance Australia articles and thought that a tag like "review=yes" or something would be useful to single out any articles that appear to warrant another look as I seeing some which may not even be notable enough to warrant articles Gnan garra 02:39, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that a couple of articles I looked at appear to be non notable subjects base on what I'm seeing so what I was looking for was a way while using AWB to tag those I want to go back to, to ensure they are note worthy Alby Mangels is case in point the talk page says please sign a petition to get his biography published, that rings bells that the notability of the subject is questionable. I didnt know of the attention tag, but I would presume this would be for something like Newscastle doesnt have anything on the recent storm or the boat running aground. (that reminds me the news here just said the Pasha Bulker is taking on water and leaking fuel) or you find a page where all the images have been removed cleanup tags etc added. Anyhow I open to suggestions. Gnan garra 04:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I remember him now, twas only a little tike then, he had the silly blonde that never wore anything more than a bikini top right :P. Ok I'll just use the attention=yes option, just looked at the template page and found attention â "yes" if the article requires immediate attention; this should be used sparingly. think that may also put eds off using it. Maybe a "review=yes" this article requires a second opinion, start a section on the talk page called Review and a comment as to why it needs a review. option would encourage its use. could also use include a link with counter on the project page to monitor both. Gnan garra 05:10, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the attention parameter would actually be more useful if it generated a worklist, with recommended actions required. Currently it requires editors with nothing better to do to glance over the category and work out why the articles are there. Be bold. I'm on your side and can see where you're heading with this, and I'm sure your ideas are heading towards something a little more effective at weeding out the junk than the processes we currently have.

Now back onto Alby, yes, he did have a female assistant who wore very little. I remember going to see World Safari at the cinema. I was only a little tacker then myself, but he did receive major exposure at the time in the media. -- Longhair\^talk 05:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<---

How do you do that?

Your talkpage displays remarkable skill - being a Scientist, I would hope to create one like yours! Can you lend me some tips, I would be most grateful,

Yours Sincerely,

User:Hortensio

I think that maybe some qualifier other than yes(though yes could be a generic catch all) would work, like

rating -- importance/class needs to be review (excluding unrated)
content -- needs wikifing, missing important content
policy -- concerns over WP:N, WP:V, or WP:NPOV
media -- subject of media commentary

Anyhow I wasnt thinking this detailed at the time, i was just being lazy looking for an easy way to capture articles that should be looked at outside of the production line AWB process. Each could be put it in a category, with a bot to maintain a counter page which could be transcluded into project page and ed's could also add to their links type page so that we quickly respond to tagged items. Gnan garra 06:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another one something for when an afd has closed. Gnan garra 06:22, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afd -- subject of a recent AfD, address concerns/information raised during the dicussion

Agree its time to get a wider input, i dont see much point in not using the template options to its capacity in reality its only changing the word yes to "foo" on an option that isnt being used because people dont know how it works. BTW an open discusison on the furture direction of the template and what functionality would be of assistance is worth doing, from I've notice around the place this template is the example being used and copied by most higher level projects so lets go forth and break new ground. Do you want to start the page off and I'll follow or....Gnan garra 02:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

im back bitch!

Reverting vandalism

No problem at all!--NeoNerd 12:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pais Hilton

Ah yes, but the Martha Stewart article classifies her as a convict, why shouldn't the same apply for Paris? --The monkeyhate 10:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, maybe you're right. I won't edit the article further. --The monkeyhate 16:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DRV

Just letting you know, I did this. This was probably half my fault - I tagged the article and asked for a second opinion on notability and BLP, but missed the AfD template altogether :| Note my reasoning in the edit summary regarding removing the DRV entirely; there's no real pressing need to keep it there, given the speed with which the undeletion happened (just clogs up the page, in addition to the google indexing). Cheers, Daniel 10:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Greetings Mr Longhair

Hey Longhair. Are you still interested in nominating VirtualSteve for RfA? If so, I started up a nomination page on Monday and you would be most welcome to add a nom if you so desire. The page is here. Take care, Sarah 06:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. I must say that I don't like lots of co-noms myself (although I think a couple are okay) but I thought I should let you know since you'd spoken about nominating him before. Thanks for the quick reply anyway. Cheers, Sarah 06:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's very nice and made me smiley. :) I hope it does go well as he works very hard and my own observations of him over the last few months have been very positive. But RfA is a strange and unpredictable beast and it's a bit frustrating at times when you see people applying arbitrary standards against common sense. Sarah 06:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic Cassette International

Hi there, you have recently deleted this article while I was working on it. I had just uploaded a few words. I was in the middle of citing it's notability, which I have now lost, when you deleted it. I was going to state it's importance in developing technology and innovation, which has been recognised by the prestigious Queen's Award for Enterprise: Innovation 2004, amongst other things. Please reconsider your decision. Darkieboy236 09:43, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Darkieboy236 09:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was dealing with it, but broadband connection problems today. Darkieboy236 14:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Article

You recently deleted an entry I had written on Maralee Gordon. I would like to disagree with you on the point that she is insignificant- Rabbi Gordon has been an important leader in her own Jewish community and has had an influential role on expanding the boundaries of women within Judaism and incorporating theories of feminism into Jewish practice. If you visit the Jewish Women's Archive website, you will see that she is featured as one of a number of important Jewish women to the feminist movement. I would really appreciate it if you undeleted that entry, and I know there are many others who would strongly agree with my opinion. Thank you. Mrudnick87 15:30, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I somehow caused the end of this article to disappear in the process of adding some references to it. This is the relevant diff. If you have time I'd be grateful if you could take a look at it since I'm pretty baffled. Thanks. --P4k 02:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard this, someone fixed it for me. Thanks. --P4k 08:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explain and justification

Explain the reasons and WP policy on why you removed the image "Image:Richmarsland.JPG" even though fair use rationale was cited correctly! --Mikecraig 03:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Iced vovos.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Iced vovos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Karmeinchan.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Karmeinchan.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Praecereus

Greetings! I see you deleted this article after a db-context tag was placed on it. Could you restore it so that I can expand upon it? Through discussion at WT:PLANTS, the consensus is that a taxobox and a single sentence is more than enough context for an article stub. Indeed, many of our thousands of articles are still only a taxobox and a sentence or two. Cheers, --Rkitko ^(talk) 17:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:YouCantStopTheMurders.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:YouCantStopTheMurders.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Statistics

The "Main export partners" and "Main import partners" in the "Economy of Australia" table are erroneously the same. Could you please change them? I don't know how. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Britney-Boy (talk • contribs)

Why was my page deleted?

I was creating a wiki artical about my band, I had only managed to write the first couple of lines when the page was deleted???

Please give a reason for this.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy bingham (talk • contribs)

Canberra & Q-town

Have you ever been in Canberra, let alone Q-town. You have to admitt that it is a hole that no-one actually vists for a holiday. They are normally trying to find the quickest way out of there before they freeze to death or die from boredom. Then there is Q-town (aka Queanbyean, Queanbiehole, or just that whole), you can actually not walk through their without getting mugged and arse-raped, worse town in the whole of NSW, they would riot like Redfern but they actually cant afford matches let alone petrol for the molotov cocktails.

The Groove Divas

You speedied this as A7, and, IMHO, but for the article's having (ostensibly accurately) noted that amongst the group's membership is/was Geneviève Marchesseau, a member of another musical group, B2Krazy, about which we have an article (which, by virtue of the existence of such article, we may presume to be notable, although I'd observe that there is just one even partially non-trivial incoming link, such that these two articles might begin to form a walled garden, speedy would have been appropriate. Because WP:BAND, though, provides that a group is likely notable where its membership includes an individual who is a member of a (different) notable group, I think the article can be understood as having, at the very least, asserted notability, such that AfD/PROD would have been appropriate (in fact, I'd think we might do well to consider AfDing B2Krazy and The Groove Divas, neither of which appears notable [although an AfD might, of course, bear out evidence to the contrary], but in the meanwhile it remains correct that whilst the former article exists unchallenged, the latter article must be understood to have asserted notability—were B2Krazy kept, The Groove Divas would at the very least be redirected thither or to a created Geneviève Marchesseau), and so I wonder if you'd undelete as having not been speediable; I'd certainly not oppose an immediate, essentially procedural listing at AfD. Feel free to let me know at your convenience. Cheers, Joe 01:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

IP vandalism

Wow that last IP that kept blanking Riana's user page was like a wild animal, lol, you go after it and then it lashes out against you. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 01:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, but it keeps us vandal watchers busy. Its a lot less boring if they're something interesting going on, eh? Obviously you'd rather have no vandalism at all, but we're still a while from that happening. Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 01:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would think that Wikipedia would overthrow the planet and make vandalizing the online encyclopedia treason before that humanity change you speak of happens ;) Croat Canuck Go Leafs Go 01:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Longhair, everytime I see your name on my last message diff I think 'woohoo!' but it's always a revert... when're you going to leave me some real messages, hmmm? ;) Seriously, thanks for keeping an eye out! Take care, Riana (talk) 08:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Heh! No, you keep doing what you do, it works :) Thanks a lot! Riana (talk) 08:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pretzel

If doing as you suggest will allow this tool to pick up recent changes to the article, then I'm fine with that. - Crockspot 06:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VS Thank you

		Thank you for your support and comments at my RfA
		Hi Longhair, Despite having wiki friends like you it still amazes me that otherwise "anonymous" editors take the time to place !votes and comments on RfAs. Whilst I would have normally thanked you at the time of you leaving your message, the importance of my not appearing to be canvassing prevented me from so doing. Now that everything has progressed successfully I can finally thank you. I intend to uphold a style of good adminship and will welcome your further comments at any time in the future, even if they are in the form of admonishment. I will be happy to help as an admin wherever and whenever I can (and I can probably manage 400 clicks per hour)! --VS ^talk 23:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Caroleskinner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Caroleskinner.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:33, 28 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Re: WP:ADEL—WP:SA

Howdy Longhair. I've had plans for awhile to pursue it, but I've had to draw back from Wikipedia lately. In any merger, I'd retain the Adelaide assessment infrastructure. I think WP:PERTH ought to do something similar, as it's been essentially dead since WP:WA.--cj | talk 08:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I agree think it should be encouraged for each state, to merge all city/region based projects into a broader state based project Gnan garra 10:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Gnangarra on this one. NSW and VIC may be the exceptions, as their respective capital city projects relate to a subject of a size necessary to maintain a separation. Other non-capital city projects should however (IMO) be merged. Orderinchaos 13:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to be the odd one out - I think even dead city projects should be given metaphoric prods - like a kick or two - before merging - however if no work within a certain amount of time - i would agree with merging Satu Suro 06:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halt the image alerts

Can you halt the image alerts for a day or so as I can't keep up for the moment. --Mikecraig 04:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Praecereus

Greetings! I'm not sure if you missed my earlier message or not, but I was wondering if you could restore that article so that I can work off what was already there. Thanks! --Rkitko ^(talk) 05:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Oz + biota

Greetings kind sir (it seems the tone I need to take this evening due to earlier in the day events :( ) I am wondering if you might think that monotreme/wp oz biota tags should be on all mammal arts yes? would you agree? cheers Satu Suro 14:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went into bat for rianna vs a very large range floating ip vndl and now have user and talk page protected :( Satu Suro 14:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well all good training :| Satu Suro 14:56, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My last comment to rebecca recently was that i was nostalgic for canberra (hehehe or should that be shuddershudder) at least you could see snow when it gets this cold - I now use my tasmania hypothermia prevention gear to sit at my computer at night - sorry to dissapoint :| Satu Suro 14:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At least my 3 teenagers and their long showers give me the shivers - our bottles of gas are 75 per bottle - and the oldest thinks 10 minute showers are the norm! fortunately a rellie gave me a free trailer of jarrah for the lounge room fire today - but the smaller pieces burn too quick - the hillside i live on used to be a jarrah forrest in the 1860's maybe even 1880's - but only small regrowth these days. Satu Suro 15:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly a year ago I was on west coast of tas - visiting old haunts so to speak - and there were these landcruiser utes taking cords of a lighter coloured timber west - really odd - at least 6 or 8 of them in the time we were on the road - mighty strange... - the stacks in some of the queenstown houses were larger in volume than the houses they were piled against ?! Satu Suro 15:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hi, I'm admin on Commons, and I need to see the date this image was uploaded here, to fix its description on Commons. I cannot see here because I'm not admin, and I see you are on Recent Changes. Thank you so much. Kordas 12:48, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! Thank you again :-) Kordas 13:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serious panic

I got enthusiastic today about tagging - and only just now realised that using category in the project catholicism did not remove the next line the way the class NA does - is there anything tinkerable in their template - or is it penance and revisit each? Satu Suro 12:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC) WHat i mean can the innards be adjusted re the category to mean the same as NA? ? ? Satu Suro 12:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC) Am I beyond redemption? Satu Suro 13:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to interrupt your very good start to the month - could I please ask further re the project catholicism template issue that bothers me? Satu Suro 02:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please? Satu Suro 05:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk:Ancient Roman Christianity - is the one which I put the NA - and is how it seems best - as all the earlier ones tagged were with category and still had the importance question below the class=category. Satu Suro 05:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So if I get that - I should go back and retag them all as NA for everybodies sanity and mine ? Satu Suro 05:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHat had concerned me was that a few hundred categories for that particular project now appear to have categories that are assessable - wont that stuff their assessment calculations? Satu Suro 05:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So it looks like to do what i have done in the oz case - tag with NA and ignore if any projects do have class- category relationships - as it is a mis-read?Satu Suro 05:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A final word on it all would be appreciated - continue in any project with NA and avoid use of category - unless it is sitting in the template? Satu Suro 05:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that sorry to have been such a nuisance - I Just had a peek inside the template - gawd - glad its you and not me going through all that - reminds me when I used to work in the oil industry doing exploration processing seismic stuff and getting woken up a 2 am with an operator saying, I think you got a comma out of place on your programme... sigh. Thanks for your hard work - cheers - and have a good week! Satu Suro 06:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very impressed by the OZ class=cat - is much more logical than NA and NA - also it looks good - thanks for that! Satu Suro 06:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Operation Sorbet 1.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Operation Sorbet 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Noticed

In the floods in australia edit history your change of the title there - maybe you are the one to answer the cyclones duplication issue at the noticeboard :) Satu Suro 08:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Super pipeline.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Super pipeline.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image tagging for Image:Vpierce.car.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vpierce.car.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My usernamechange

I just want the bureaucrats to change my username because it is my serious request. I don't know where the problem is. You gave me the link and I read it and there is also written that I have to contact a bureaucrat for my usernamechange. So please accept my desire and cancel my serious request by changing my username. Thanks. R@y 12:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessment

I have done extensive work on the Innisfail article. If you could reassess it when you have time I would appreciated any tips on how to improve it further. Thanks Abcdefghayden 12:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you need a chuckle

I blindly sped afl=yes into the regional leagues - checked that regional codes belong to sports project (despite the many regional codes with names xxx 'afl' - gawd the catholic project on the weekend, now this - so slowly and erratically reverting self - so afl and sports project tallies might be a bit odd until i have finished the cleanup :( Satu Suro 14:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the categories however really are quite marginal either way - my advice was that specific arts and cats that refer to the current afl are afl - and all else sports. I really think there should be a 'oz football' master category that holds the regional leagues (not necessarily a project) - however my head is not ready for that yet Satu Suro 14:14, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mean to say - the example from a south australian article: now if there was a regional game linked from that page....

This Australian rules football-related article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

Categories: Australian rules football competitions | Australian rules football stubs

It would follow unless the distinction was made very very clear in the afl project pages - that it would look like the afl tag on the discussion page would follow, not sports. Which talk/discussion location would you suggest a need for clarification on this? the sports/afl and oz project pages? Satu Suro 14:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless I'm missing something, I don't actually see its that much of a problem. afl=yes|sport=yes is for Australian Football League. other leagues and associated articles can be simply sport=yes. If some non AFL articles are misnamed with the words AFL in the title, then they should be renamed. Can you give some examples? —Moondyne 14:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are not missing anything - I do not think on the afl or sports projects, (then again i might have missed something) actually have the distinction spelled out (for whoever follows that is) - however if I find something I'll let you know - longhair my apologies to have left all this here - trust all is well. I'll get out of your way. Satu Suro 14:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A possibility is that WP:AFL be expanded to include all Australian rules football articles, but thats been canvassed before - see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject AFL#Australian rules WikiProject and no-one sounded too enthusiastic. —Moondyne 14:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that I can now understand very clearly the desire to keep the separation when I think what I have been tagging :( Satu Suro 14:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tommydysartmatlockpolice.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tommydysartmatlockpolice.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sthornton prisoner.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sthornton prisoner.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:William Wobbler screenshot.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:William Wobbler screenshot.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Photo of Tony Mundine

Hi Longhair. Do you a way to get the photo from [1] to use on Tony Mundine (boxer). As am unsure if the copyright would allow it. Boylo 03:26, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 08:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Theystillcallmebruce.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Theystillcallmebruce.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Theycallmebruce-cover.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Theycallmebruce-cover.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Thefrankstonmurders.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Thefrankstonmurders.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Thecastle soundtrack.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Thecastle soundtrack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Springs Juvenile Holding Centre

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Alice Springs Juvenile Holding Centre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 11:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Men at Work is new ACOTF

Hi Longhair. Men at Work has been selected as the new Australian collaboration. As you nominated it, you might like to take a lead in developing the article by setting up a to do list for it. Please also nominate any other articles you'd like to see worked on, as the list is rather short tonight. Cheers. --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GaryStevenMurphy.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GaryStevenMurphy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:01, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GaryStevenMurphy.jpg

Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:GaryStevenMurphy.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary., In particular, which law enforcement agency or department took the photo? ShakespeareFan00 21:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Andrewgarforth.jpg

I have tagged Image:Andrewgarforth.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bjmurdochmugshot.jpg

I have tagged Image:Bjmurdochmugshot.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bjmurdochmugshot.jpg

Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:Bjmurdochmugshot.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary., In particular which law-enforcement agency took the photo? ShakespeareFan00 21:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BrendenAbbott mugshot.jpg

Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:BrendenAbbott mugshot.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary., In particular which law enforcement agency took the photo? ShakespeareFan00 21:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Tallaal_adrey.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tallaal_adrey.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NguyenTuongVan_mugshot.jpg

I have tagged Image:NguyenTuongVan_mugshot.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Michaeljamesmurdoch.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Michaeljamesmurdoch.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michaeljamesmurdoch.jpg

I have tagged Image:Michaeljamesmurdoch.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:James-Bazley.jpg

I have tagged Image:James-Bazley.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Johnwayneglover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Johnwayneglover.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Johnwayneglover.jpg

I have tagged Image:Johnwayneglover.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Keith_george_faure.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Keith_george_faure.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Keith_george_faure.jpg

I have tagged Image:Keith_george_faure.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Mrbaldy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mrbaldy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mrbaldy.jpg

I have tagged Image:Mrbaldy.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pauldenyer.jpg

I have tagged Image:Pauldenyer.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Robert-Trimbole-mugshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Robert-Trimbole-mugshot.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Robert-Trimbole-mugshot.jpg

I have tagged Image:Robert-Trimbole-mugshot.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Skafbilal.jpg

I have tagged Image:Skafbilal.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:WelcomeToWoopWoppSoundtrackCover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WelcomeToWoopWoppSoundtrackCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert!

Thanks for the revert on my user page. I really appreciate it. Chris 13:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks

I can see in your work you have found some of my incorrect afl tags and in process of reverting to sports. Thanks for that.

I dont believe I will ever come to the stage where there is not a red discussion tag above an australian article or category it seems endless, sigh Satu Suro 04:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a question at template australia you might be able to answer or help with Satu Suro 11:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good block

Good block. Waste of our time that one was.--Chaser - T 06:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:ZuniDoll.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ZuniDoll.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. But|seriously|folks 05:01, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plus it used to scare the crap out of me! Seriously, it's replaceable because someone could take a free picture of it for use here. -- But|seriously|folks 05:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wandabookcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wandabookcover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Please

Could you indicate whether you can help - as there are issues that are emanating from this. Thanks. Using class=cat in the Australian template is concerning some as it is showing that its an unassessed importance - compared to using NA.

If you cannot tweak this - could you please alert someone who can (no offence meant) - as there is now a parallel and potentially confusing range of categories that I have placed NA and some with cat - it would be great for both to show - article not assessed as NA currently shows. I do hope there is something that can be done - cheers Satu Suro 06:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please - dont worry - it can wait - take it easy - that sort of thing can really knock you around - had 2 consecutive ones that basically wiped me out a couple of years ago, even a short one can be quite a knock. I have reverted io NA in my tagging for the moment anyways. cheers Satu Suro 02:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Slater and gordon lawyers logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Slater and gordon lawyers logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serial killer task force

I am also a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Criminal Biography. I am interested in setting up a serial killer task force on this project. I have seen that you have contributed a lot to the subject and was wondering how one might go about doing this? I don't have any experience with setting up a task force, I would do all I can, but you being an editor I was hoping you might start this project. If you are not interested in being its founder how might I go about setting up this project? Please leave me a message regarding this. Jmm6f488 23:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bevenvon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bevenvon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 09:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Gooch

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Richard Gooch, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 16:48, 23 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Deleted deletion debate

Hey Longhair. A while back you deleted Talk:How to adjust brakes as an orphaned talk page. While that page was orphaned, it was an archived deletion debate of the page it was attached to; the result of the more primitive archiving process back in the days of "votes for deletion" (VfD). See Wikipedia:Archived delete debates/Jan to Apr 2004 for where this page is listed, now red-linked. This comes up as a result of this post at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Can you restore the page? Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit 02:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! We're well on our way to restoring the 40 or so similarly situated archive pages. It's really not unexpected that there have been these deletions when these pages gave no good indication without an archive header (which I see you saw the discussion of and posted:-)--Fuhghettaboutit 01:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Street vendor

Hi. Some time ago you deleted Street vendor.[2] I remember a stubby, but certainly not nonsensical, article with that title. Is it possible that the silly article you deleted was the result of vandalism to a meaningful one? --Lambiam 15:49, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bevenvon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bevenvon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:00, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belconnen Remand Centre

Was wondering if you'd like to take a look at this article you created back in 2004 and if you'd care to update it, hopefully with some references. I could do it, but you might have access to more resources than I do and my first instinct is to merge it into Belconnen. 24.4.253.249 01:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

citizen

I'm not really a wikipedia contributor and don't know how all this works , but your image of St. Arnaud High street is actually that of the main street of a neighboring town, Donald. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.154.24.147 (talk • contribs)

Fixed. -- Longhair\^talk 00:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australia-Indonesia Prisoner Exchange Agreement

Thanks for going through and cleaning up that article. I just did a blanket revert of a banned user. Hope you understand. regards --Merbabu 10:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Mak Sai Ying and the Australian Project

I feel that Mak Sai Ying is a worthy page requiring attention within a national project. The subject has been brought up in federal parlaiment. I would like to see others, with more skill than myself, attracted to the page. DDB 02:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-WarthogDemon 00:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Franklin Jr

Hi Longhair. Could you please have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Franklin Jr and the points I raised there about related articles. The editors of the related articles seem to have done a bit of a ring or redirects and I can't seem to follow where it all started. Thanks, Mattinbgn/^talk 04:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was worried I would create more mess than I fixed if I started. -- Mattinbgn/^talk 04:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blooming Onion

Hi - was curious why you put the unreferenced tag back on that article after I actually added a couple references and did fact tags on the remaining things that need to be referenced. My understanding per Category:Articles lacking sources and Wikipedia:Unreferenced Articles was that the unreferenced box was reserved for articles with zero citations. If that's incorrect, let me know. Thanks. Old64mb 23:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was actually looking for that tag for another article! Old64mb 00:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your reference bot

Hi, I think you are running a reference bot that is really going wild.

It is tagging way too many articles that are currently in stub phase. Examples include Crown of Frederick I, which has literally 2 lines.
Some are barely even an article yet like Fried noodles, which is so far just a list.
It also can't recognize pages that already have references like Mung bean.
It seems to be extremely limited to recognizing footnote syntax only.

While we will eventually get references for developing articles, this tagging is currently adding quite a bit of extra work to the users. Benjwong 14:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Portal talk:Australian music

I had it set to class=portal so that it could be classified into the importance categories (high importance, in this case). If that isn't appropriate, then I acknowledge your edit [3], just thought I should let you know. Giggy ^Talk 07:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You learn something new every day :) Happy editing! Giggy ^Talk 07:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very impressed

By the locate me tag - the potential ambiguity and ambience of the tag is indeed potentially volcanic when i think of it as a potential item on some troublesome talk pages :| Satu Suro 09:17, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand its real use and purpose - but you will never get me using as suggested above, however the thought alone is enough. Satu Suro 09:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Assessments

Hi Longhair I always notice on my watchlist you're always busy doing assessments on WP Aust articles, so I'd just like to say thanks! Also, you just put a project stats table on WikiProject Gridiron in Australia, a small WP I started, which is very cool! Again, thanks. --Breno ^talk 02:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Image talk:CalderVenue.jpg

Hello Longhair, I have left a message to you on the talk page regarding the tagging of Calder Parks Venue photograph. Virtualr84 04:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just replied back regarding the status of the image and previous contact, hopefully it can be released under a licence that will properly cover it when I receive the next reply from them via email.

Virtualr84 07:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of proposal: Guideline/policy governing lists

Dear editor:

Given your extensive experience here on Wikipedia, I would greatly appreciate your input on the following topic:

Wikipedia: Village pump (policy)#Proposal to make a policy or guideline for lists

Thank you in advance for any thoughts you may have on the topic.

Regards,

Sidatio 15:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Unreferenced tag in Rasam

Hello there!

I've added a few recipe references in the page. Please let me know if this is good enough.

Thanks, Jyothis 18:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

People/animal deaths

Re: [4] - I note that the category '1944 deaths' is for "people who died in 1944". Is there somewhere for non-people deaths by year? Stevage 03:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked on Wictionary

Alison, I'm wondering if you know anything about Wictionary. I was unrightfully blocked from it for abusing multiple accounts. Since they don't have unblock templates, how do I appeal for an unblock there? LOZ: OOT 06:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Strange story, though. I go there and shortly after my first edit I get blocked by Connel MacKenzie. That really, if you'll excuse the word and rage I am expressing, PISSED ME OFF!

I'm just looking for a user that I know is a sysop that is currently online to help me. But that's ok if you can't, and I'm sorry if I sound like I'm a troll. LOZ: OOT 07:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:StrictlyBallroom.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:StrictlyBallroom.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 00:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Random Smiley Award

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

Luk suh 03:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caitlin Hill

What sources do you consider unreliable? Ichormosquito 06:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Are you able

To remove the false howard pages and their redirects after this current spate...? Hope you are - cheers Satu Suro 11:14, 24 August 2007 (UTC) Thanks for that - there is so much misinformation about wikipedia in the australian media today - literally - radio and print - its a pity our wikimedia foundation mob havent answered back to all and sundry or checked them on their misinformation. cheers Satu Suro 11:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry ill be off for rest of night myself- hope someone else is watching Satu Suro 11:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

moving pages over history

Hi Longhair. Just letting you know I've restored the history of those Townsville suburbs. It looked like the moves you made were really repairing copy/paste moves, so restoring the old history is correct. Hope this is OK by you and I didn't miss some bigger issue. --Scott Davis ^Talk 09:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Rove

Just referring to a segment on Rove Live this evening which was similar to what Stephen Colbert has done on his show in the States. --cj | talk 12:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

re request for assistance

Thanks Longhair for that very quick response. I comprehend the process you describe, but have not a clue on how to transfer the photo from my file into the edit. If explaining this is too complex I'll have to get my pet computer guru to come & talk me through it.Geoffrey Wickham 01:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Apropos of nothing

It was curious to see your name associated with a talkpage edit on The Radiators (Australian band), since The Radiators (US) are associated with Professor Longhair. I was wondering if maybe you were editing the wrong article, but obviously not. Just a confusing, amusing coincidence. :) Cheers, Xtifr _tälk 22:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi:

Why would there be copyright issues concerning a photograph that I own? It's a studio portrait taken 10 years ago.

Thanks

Meg —Preceding unsigned comment added by MegHargrave (talk • contribs) 05:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Denyer

I'm just writing to ask what your interest is in Paul Denyer. I ask because I am Paul brother, David. If you have any interests in Paul. Please feel free to let me know and I'll try to answer any questions and I'll try to answer them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedenyers (talk • contribs)

Talk:Makybe Diva and 220.240.158.28

May I request that you take a look at the edits of 220.240.158.28 on Talk:Makybe Diva. On 5 occasions I have reverted edits by this user, and pointed out that the Wikipedia talk page policy is not to edit other editors comments without their permission. The user continues to abuse this policy and I would ask that you consider warning or banning the user. Constantly reverting these edits is becoming tedious. - Cuddy Wifter 02:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...

... probably best just to remove that image. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Tach Duc Thanh Nguyen ABC.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tach Duc Thanh Nguyen ABC.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]