Jump to content

User talk:Zscout370

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pinay06 (talk | contribs) at 02:16, 11 March 2011 (→‎deletion request of Arnold Zamora). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Current time: Thursday, August 22, 2024, 17:30 (UTC) Number of articles on English Wikipedia: 6,871,110
Archive
Archives

Correction on the national flag of Macedonia

hello zscout, there are some details to correct in the Macedonian flag. The diagonal rays are too thin near the sun. On the other side, the two vertical rays are a little bit too thick than they should be. Could you correct them according to the sources you have used the last time you corrected the file?

http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/mk.html#law http://www.slvesnik.com.mk/WBStorage/Files/Zname.gif 93.219.254.127 (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 17:13, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your precise work, but the diagonal rays have to be corrected also, as i explained above. could you fix them too?93.219.244.98 (talk) 07:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think I actually got it now. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:05, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rp: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Coat_of_Arms_of_the_Bagrationi_Dynasty.svg

I don't know what your email address is and neither do I know what I'm supposed to say. Fry clearly doens't enjoy discussion, so he uploaded File:Coat of Arms of the Bagrationi Dynasty (original).svg (including the typo in the motto that I noted) instead - which he probably over time will introduce in every related Wikipedia article, like a silent ninja without edit summaries as far as I know him. - SSJ t 12:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
All you have to do is click "Email this user" at the left side of your page, and it will allow you to email users. Anyways, this is not the first (not the last) issue that I ever had directly conflict with him on or had to mediate. I do admit that it is a radical change from the previous version, but sometimes things will improve. I had that problem before that one user wants the older images, even though 10 want the newer one. I would still suggest to turn the greyish into white, to match the official images that I found, but that is about it. I cannot speak for the accuracy for the motto, so that is something I will need to research. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, alright. I asked about the motto here. I'm not dead set in favour of grey instead of white, so I'll see what I can do. But like I said in the discussion, I don't see any justification for the made-up argument that a rendering of a coat of arms is "better" or "more accurate" if it somehow has a look that is more similar to another interpretation (i.e. e.g. the version shown on the website of the royal house). The original blazoning is the only thing that absolutely has to be followed. There is a tradition to allow for the use of a literal silver type colour (grey) where the blazoning says argent, for instance seen in this interpretation of the Luxembourgian coat of arms and this interpretation of the coat of arms of Austria-Hungary. - SSJ t 20:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
With the Luxembourg arms, the law does show a silver tint where white would normally be (while this is not the case for the naval flag, but the law is the law) and I do not dispute that. Fry would, but I tend to be more legalistic when it comes to coat of arms. I tend to follow what government guides say about the colors. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 22:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bert and Ernie Married.jpg

Should I put a request in on Commons to undelete this? CTJF83 21:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 21:28, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Louisiana Monroe Warhawks workmark.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Louisiana Monroe Warhawks workmark.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --B (talk) 02:44, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UA Flag Standard

Got it! Check your email for more info... — Alex Khristov 03:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free-speech-flag.svg

You deleted NewFreeSpeechFlag.svg

what about File:Free-speech-flag.svg ? it is essentially the same idea.

Decora (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that NewFreeSpeechFlag.svg and the file you uploaded are about the PS3 code; this one is about the HD DVD key. Until we know for sure about the PS3 one, we need to have those deleted for the time being. We already have the HD DVD key resolved years ago. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 22:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
thank you very much for your insights into this case. ( i refer to Media copyright questions ) i would appreciate any pointers as to where i can find links to old discussions, etc. thanks again. Decora (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have been keeping an eye on that. I am not able to find anything right now, but I would suggest to look at the article we have on the HD DVD key. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deletion request of [Arnold Zamora]

thank you! it has been deleted. Pinay (talk•email) 02:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I started the DR, that's why. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 02:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deletion request of [Arnold Zamora]

thank you! it has been deleted. Pinay (talk•email) 02:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zscout370&oldid=418231401"