Talk:Ides of March
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ides of March article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Meaning
Yes, but what does the word ides mean? (look that up!)
- The Ides of March is just one of a dozen Ides that occur every month of the year. See http://www.infoplease.com/spot/ides1.html
AND ANNIE? "Caesar was assassinated on the annie after declaring himself..." Wouldn't anniversary or 1st anniversary be less obsequious? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.212.37 (talk) 12:21, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Trivia
changed to Iron Maiden, a NWOBHM band, have an instrumental piece named The Ides of March on their second album, Killers. instead of Iron Maiden, a British NWOBHM band, have an instrumental piece named The Ides of March on their second album, Killers. (British new wave of British heavy metal band doesn't make sense).
Singular or Plural
The article uses language that assumes the word "ides"--even when referring to a single day--is plural, but the etymology of the word certainly suggests that it is singular. So I'd think that "The ides were simply the middle of the month." should be "The ides was simply the middle of the month." or possibly "The ides were simply the midpoints each month."
- "Ides" should be treated as the singular (I checked my dicitonary); the plural, though, is also "ides" (it doesn't change, just like "deer").Squad51 17:54, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- the Latin "idus" is plural, so perhaps this accounts for the confusion. Incidentally, this means that the Latin should be "idus martias" not "idus martiae", and I have corrected that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.166.46 (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
the band
Does this really need to be in here? A one hit wonder from 30 years ago doesn't seem to be deserving a an encyplopedic entry that would necessitate a disambig page, and I sincerely doubt even a small fraction of people looking at this entry are looking for the band. Charles 17:14, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
someone has been tampering with this article...."raped again, forced to soliciate oral sex to the decendants of Bill Gates"
Xena
are you joking me? what nerd put that trivia in there? I think it should be removed. Or, at the very least, shortened so that a summary description is not present. It's totally out of place.
"Revival" on Ides of March, 2006
Removed from article:
- It was prophesied that revival will break out on college campuses throught the US on the Ides of March, 2006.
Revival of what? A source would be helpful here. • WarpFlyght (talk) 05:20, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- I asked the person who posted that for sources on their talk page. we'll see what happens.--B.U. Football For Life|Talk 05:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Page has been defaced
I believe this page has been defaced.
- Yes, I just noticed it and reverted the vandalism. --Canley 11:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
I believe there's still some stuff left from the vandalism. Such as the amount of stabs. Man, that would be a badass death. >9000 stabs.
More Vandalism
I don't think ARNOLD and pushups are relevant.
- Of all the articles on Wikipedia to vandalize, why are people bothering to screw around with this one?
Another vandalism reverted.
Date Inconsistency?
In the Assassination section, we first learn that "On February 15, 41 BC, Caesar sat upon his gilded chair..." Yet later in the section we learn he was assassinated on the Ides of March (March 15th), in 44 BC. Wouldn't 44 BC have come before 41 BC? Should 41 BC really say 44 BC?
It's 44 BC according to this website: http://www.unrv.com/fall-republic/caesar-the-king.php Though someone already made the change.
44 BC should be 710 AUC (not 709) according to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab_urbe_condita —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.143.36.158 (talk) 03:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Which stab killed Caesar?
I heard somewhere that of the 23 stab wounds that Caesar had, only one was fatal and that was Brutus'. Can anyone confirm this? It was the second one, in his chest. --Must WIN 01:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- I very, very much doubt this.22:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.131.228 (talk)
- According to Mr Shakespeare, "They stab Caesar, Casca first, Brutus last". Which is odd, coz I thought Cassius did the first blow. And Brutus being last doesn't necessarily imply last out of two.--TimothyJacobson (talk) 11:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Project Chanology
The next protest is on this date. Explains the vandalism.--Oreichalcos (talk) 14:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Stripping off topic content
It is the Ides of March, people, and I came to this article expecting an article about the Ides of March. Somehow, it has turned into a second Assassination of Julius Caesar article. I have removed most of the assassination content except that which relates to the Ides of March, and also removed the Merge template which has been sitting on this article since last May.... LAST MAY! Ach! GreyWyvern 14:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Cleopatra?
In the motion picture Cleopatra starring Elizabeth Taylor and Rex Harrison as Ceaser, she was visiting at the time of the assasination. Is there any truth that Cleopatra was indeed in Rome when this event occurred? Also her sooth-sayer/oracle warned her of this, after a night of storms.
China
Did China also have "ides" or what it has to do with roman ides of March? Looks like out of context. --78.61.94.98 01:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
"Displaced"?
The term had real meaning only in the traditional Roman calendar, which was displaced by the Julian calendar in 46 BC; however, it was still used in a colloquial sense for centuries afterwards to denote the middle of the month. Is this correct? I was under the impression that the Romans continued to count dates from the Nones, Ides, and Kalends after the Julian reform. Indeed, the leap day was defined as simply doubling the sixth day before the Kalends of March. I have therefore removed that line Nik42 18:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
"Appearances"?
Why in the world is this section called "Appearances"? That makes no sense. Something like "Significant Historical Events" would be closer to the mark. Is "Appearances" frequently used for articles on dates? It seems most if not all (including March 15) have this breakdown:
- * 1 Events - * 2 Births - * 3 Deaths - * 4 Holidays and observances - * 5 External links
Seems to me the Ides of March should match that. My personal preference would just be the simple "Events", although I admit there is room for discussion. But "Appearances" has to go. Thmazing (talk) 02:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)Thmazing
Romeo and Juliet
Under appearance, you have stated that Romeo and Juliet were married on the Ides of March. However, according to Shakespeare's play, it is August. In Act One, when the nurse and Lady Capulet discuss how old Juliet is the nurse states, "She's not fourteen. How long is it now to Lammastide?" Lady Capulet replies, "A fortnight and odd days." (Fortnight is two weeks) The side notes explain that "Lammastide is a relious feast day on August 1 and the day after Juliet's briday. The feast day is now a little more than two weeks. (a fortnight)" (McDougal Littel Language and Literature 1994 Teacher's Edition).
In addition, in Act Three, Benvolio tries to urge Mercutio to leave the town square since "The day is hot, the Capulets abroad, and if we meet, we shall not scape a brawl" Again McDougal Littel sidenotes explain that the words can be explained that "It is hot summer day in August".
I have not found a reference that it is a full moon anywhere; however, if it is July 15 that would make more sense that it is the ides of July if August 1 is in two weeks. However, it is NOT the ides of March. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.176.95.9 (talk) 16:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Parker Posey
In the main article, there is a line which says:
- In the film The House of Yes, Parker Posey's character goes by the name Jackie-O ever since she attended an Ides of March party dressed as the former first lady
Although this is unsourced and I have never seen (or heard of the film), I shall change this line to remove the Jackie-O bit, which currently seems to be the point of the line, even though nothing today with the Ides of March--TimothyJacobson (talk) 11:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Done --TimothyJacobson (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Cleaned up a lot of the lists
Too much stuff was being added to this article which only passively referenced the Ides of March. Bands mentioning it in their lyrics? People in film happening to die on March 15th? Used as a couple lines of dialogue in a tv show? These uses aren't notable. Unless the phrase IoM is integral to the work being referenced, it really should not be included in any lists here; doing otherwise would make all of the lists impossible to complete, as well as making the article unnecessarily lengthy. GreyWyvern (talk) 17:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Please redirect the Ares Mythology (no page yet) to the existing page on Ares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ares
Thanks, sorry if this is in the wrong place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.66.159.70 (talk) 05:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Redirected to Roman Mars (as before) Dedekmraz (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Usage in modern popular culture
Please don't add references here unless the phrase "Ides of March" is integral to the work in question; like if it's the title, or the main theme of the work. If it was just mentioned in the dialogue, or lyrics, or visible in a scene or two, then it is likely not notable enough for inclusion. I'm just remarking on this because if we include every reference to the Ides of March, this list is going to fill up with stuff that adds very little to the article itself. GreyWyvern (talk) 15:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Marked for Copyediting
This article is a mess, grammatically and in Wiki structure. Marked for a copyeditor's attention. Parasane (talk) 16:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Not to mention the false information about Caesar being murerd in the forum. (Note the pic: It's Caesar being murdered in the Curia of the Theatre of Pompey.--Amadscientist (talk) 23:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
March 13?
The anonymous IP 65.190.132.195 on 03:41, 3 March 2010 added that "Ides of March" originally referred to March 13. A quick Googling turned up nothing to support that. Is there any evidence for that claim? --Mr. Billion (talk) 06:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
March 15 1993
Okay so i did some research on the full moon subject, and on March 15, 1993 there was no full more, nor was it on the fourteenth. Actually it was on the sixth. So the question here is, how many more "ides" have not had a full moon, and if this happens then shouldn't the fact about the full moon be removed from the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Death-n-l (talk • contribs) 23:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Czar Nicholas II
The Czar of Russia abdicated on the ides of march and he alos abdicated for his son the same day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.252.52.23 (talk) 03:30, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- Unassessed Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Unknown-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- Unassessed Time articles
- Unknown-importance Time articles
- Time articles needing infoboxes
- Selected anniversaries (March 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2010)