Talk:Serbia

Motto should be stated

Our country motto Only Unity Saves the Serbs / Samo Sloga Srbina Spašava should be stated on the page. There should also be the english translation of the anthem God of Justice —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.93.123.82 (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.131.82.80 (talk) 22:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

It is not the official motto of the country. Ostalocutanje (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Serbia nature and sports

Someone please put more nature images of Serbia because it has a beautiful nature so find some interesting pictures and about Sport section please put at least 2 more pictures of football team or basketball team please!

I agree that there must be much more pictures of Serbia's landscapes, mountains (Zlatibor, Kopaonik, Stara planina...),popular destinations (such as Vrnjacka Banja), monasteries, buildings, wheat fields in Vojvodina, rivers (Danube, Morava, Drina, Lim). I live in Serbia and reading this article makes me think I am living in a country in which is the most important thing its history.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.216.210.26 (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC) 

Population of Serbia

Serbia has 7.498.001 citizens excluding Kosovo and Metohija according to the last census from 2002: http://www.srbija.gov.rs/pages/article.php?id=6 Someone please put that! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.121.90.52 (talk) 12:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Kosovo and Metohija is part of Serbia. Alek serb (talk) 03:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

This is disputed as everyone knows. TheArchaeologist Say Herro 01:54, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Similarly is with Abhazia and South Osetia, but same principle is not applied. What is mandatory in recognition of countries is UN and according to UN Kosovo is part of Serbia all statistics should reflect that view. If someone is interested for Kosovo situation there is Kosovo page so Kosovo statistics can be read. Again, not same principle is used for Georgia. What everyone knows is that those who have 80% of world GDP allow themselves to create even encyclopedia not following their own principles. Or, simply write under description of Wikipedia your that it is based on predominantly western views and media since it really does not take scientific analysis to verify that

18:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)18:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)18:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)~~`. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.121.15.138 (talk) 17:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Economy 2011

Should the GDP be updated with the 2011 estimate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.1.217 (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Re: The Holocaust/Genocide over the Serbs in NDH

I spotted some stuff here: Holocaust/genocide over the Serbs in NDH As a Jew well-versed on these matters I would like to make a clarification on this matter. The Holocaust is specifically the mass murder by Nazi Germany of various peoples deemed undesirable. It is not exclusively the slaughter of 1/3 of the Jewish population. The Jewish portion of the Holocaust is commonly referred to as "HaShoah" or the Calamity in Hebrew. Please do not confuse the two. Thanks! =) TheArchaeologist Say Herro 04:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

DO NOT CHANGE THE DATES

I've made a change to the formation events and dates adding two more important events and dates,do not change or reedit them,as they are completely correct!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rekonstruh (talk • contribs) 09:51, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Fine. Now, do you read the answers to your questions? You were already told that, in Talk:Serbia/Archive_6#Do_not_change:

There is no such thing as "do not change" on Wikipedia. Right below your edit box, it reads:

If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.

That being said, no one disputes correctness of those facts (they are all stated in the text), just their relevance for the infobox. The infobox is supposed to summarize the most important landmark events for the modern state.

Button's concern was that Loss of independence is not an "establishment". My concern was that proclamation of the Empire was not a landmark event that deserves mention in the infobox. Nobody disputes accuracy of the years: both years are already in the article text. Nobody disputes that the sky is blue either, but we don't write it in the article about Serbia. No such user (talk) 12:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)