User talk:81.144.235.66

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 81.144.235.66, is registered to Christs Hospital School, Sussex, England, United Kingdom and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.

The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Old Blues, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Old Blues was changed by 81.144.235.66 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-09-21T18:54:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:54, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Liberal Democrats. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've been warned about this on several previous occasions. Please discuss proposed changes on the Talk page, citing sources. Rodhull andemu 17:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for You should have taken my advice. Truth is not relevant, verifiability is, and you are required to cite sources and discuss controversial changes.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 17:56, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User:The Twelfth Doctor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Spider monkey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 19:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Toast, you may be blocked from editing. Anaxial (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mike Hancock (UK politician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fæ (talk) 13:26, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Searle. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FruitMonkey (talk) 19:51, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Christ's Hospital. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to The Saturdays. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Off2riorob (talk) 16:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Wanted, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Off2riorob (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address might be disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Alternatively, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.

Kuru (talk) 17:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Labour Party (UK). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. These descriptions have been discussed on the Talk page; please see discussions there, and adhere to existing consensus. Rodhull andemu 20:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Labour Party (UK). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Please discuss these changes on the Talk page; this has been thrashed out on numerous previous occasions.and consensus has been reached as to what should be there. Rodhull andemu 20:45, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Conservative Party (UK). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rodhull andemu 20:47, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Labour Party (UK), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I won't tell you again; these require sources and consensus. Rodhull andemu 20:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for persistent edit-warring despite previous blocks, persistent addition of unsourced material and personal opinion, failure to discuss with fellow-editors.. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 17:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Friedrich Nietzsche has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 16:35, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Taio Cruz, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. January ^(talk) 20:54, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

David Miliband

Your edit had nothing to do with the section it was replacing, the heading was incorrectly factored, and the writing wasn't terribly good. More importantly, it appears to contain your own point of view (that Ed has been ineffectual as Leader of the Opposition), which is unacceptable. If you really think the information should be on the page, find a more appropriate place in the article to place it or, even better, bring the information to the talk page for help on if, where, and how it should be included. -Rrius (talk) 21:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elisabeth Sladen

Hi, 81.144.235.66. Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia. I noticed that you have changed the year of birth in the Elisabeth Sladen article. Although lots of people have reported her year of birth to be 1948, some editors have researched this and her birth record actually shows she was born in 1946. Similarly, The Guardian published a correction to her obituary, stating that the 1948 date was wrong. Rather than changing content back and forth in the article, you're welcome to discuss this issue on the Elisabeth Sladen discussion page, where lots of other editors have been talking about this.--McGeddon (talk) 14:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NOtoAV

Thank you for your contributions to the 'Individuals supporting NOtoAV'. These facts may be true however, because this is a contreversial issue, you need to find refrences to back this up. I have not removed the edits but you may wish to find refrences before someone else does. Please remember this for the future, thankyou. Oddbodz (talk) 20:39, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tim Farron with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kmg90 (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mick Jones (athlete). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you! -- Who needs names? ^{talk the talk} 16:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aloysius Spotiswoode with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Harry (talk) 17:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aloysius Spotiswoode with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aloysius Spotiswoode with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:51, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Aloysius Spotiswoode. Harry (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Grayson

You edited the page about me to say that I have left the Liberal Democrats and joined the Labour Party. This is not true. I note that you offered no evidence and could not have done so because there is none. I regard such a comment as a serious inaccuracy and so have edited myself, back to the previous version.Rsgrayson (talk) 11:16, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Rsgrayson[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.