Jump to content

User talk:Bugnot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bugnot (talk | contribs) at 15:35, 8 July 2011 (→‎July 2011). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

copy vio and other editing problems

Bugnot,

Currently you are just copypasting sentences directly from sources without paraphrasing. This is not acceptable.You have been warned before not to do this. You cannot simply copy a sentence from a source a paste it like you did here. (an entire sentence from the hindu made it unaltered into the text)

And secondly the text you are adding is soapboxing. wikipedia articles shouldnt be telling people and goverments what they should be doing or not doing. For example take the text you added to Poverty in India

Overpopulation is a major cause of poverty in India, the world's second most populous nation with over a billion people, contributing towards mass unemployment and corruption in implementing poverty-curbing measures on a large-scale. Indian Government has failed in recent years to implement any effective measures to curb population growth. It is widely believed that a United Nations directive or some type of international regulation would help the Indian Government draw its attention towards this major issue because otherwise the Government of India is not focusing at all on this issue due to previous electoral concerns (see Compulsory_sterilization#India and The Emergency (India)).[1] If India's current lax attitude persists, UN researchers predict that by 2030 India will become the most populous nation in the world, with almost a third of the world's poor and unemployed. Significant efforts, like China's one child policy, are needed in recent times to prevent this from happening in India but a lack of will amongst Indian politicians and political parties has led to not any effective measures being implemented.

There are two problems where - malecontraceptives.org is not a WP:RS. I am sure you will be able to find a lot of newspaper articles and books to back up the same facts. So please dont use websites and blogs as sources. The second part says something like "X is needed, but there is no political will" as a fact. This is a opinion not a fact. There is no source to back this up and no attribution to indicate who is saying this. In short, your language is suitable for blogs and newspaper columns, but not for a summary style encylopedia. Here you have to add facts in short, neutral language and attribute opinions without stating them as facts.

note: i am not disputing anything about content, but the way you are presenting them. Please take my points into consideration while you add content in the future.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My Reply

Okay, I will keep this in mind and usually from now onwards will either enter everything within quotes or change the language/words. Moreover, the point that I stated was what I believed was a universal fact and general public-opinion as mentioned everywhere in media and, thus, I didn't mention any reference/source specifically but if you insist I will try to do so from now on. Thanks for bringing these points to my attention. Regards--Bugnot (talk) 05:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Of course, it's never my intention to bring Wikipedia to disrepute. I'm simply trying to help by bringing the facts to public attention. If you find any objectionable content, please simply delete it and kindly also notify me why you did that so that I may correct myself.--Bugnot (talk) 05:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hasan Ali Khan

I noticed you added text from a few sources into this article, such as here. I see a user above has explained to you the problem with copyright violations. I suspect many of your other edits to this article inserted copyrighted text as well. Please remove the text you know of to help the clean-up process.--NortyNort (Holla) 10:57, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hasan Ali Khan, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from multiple sources, will add to talk before clean up commences, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Hasan Ali Khan saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! NortyNort (Holla) 11:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dawood Ibrahim, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from multiple sources, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Dawood Ibrahim saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! —SpacemanSpiff 19:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 19:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly adding copyright violations despite multiple warnings over two years and at least two editors spending a lot of time helping you do this. On April 4 you were once again reminded and yet in your subsequent edits you have introduced copyright violations.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 19:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You can be unblocked if you show an understanding of the copyright policies. —SpacemanSpiff 19:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bugnot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has never been by intention to bring Wikipedia to any disrepute in any way. I know that I had been warned before regarding this but I was not aware that what I contributed later were copyright violations. If any editor/administrator had asked me to correct my mistake/s, I would have agreed to writing the contribution in my own words. I understand that you deem my contributions to be copyright-violations. Since I wish to be a genuine contributor to Wikipedia, I will comply with your regulations and laws. I will make sure that either I will quote the proper source using cquote tag (or quote it with reference) or I will contribute in my own words. If you wish, I will contribute only small or one-line quotations from copyrighted sources (with reference added) in order to comply with the laws. I have been a contributor for over two years and you would appreciate that I have made some genuine contributions as well. I hope you will keep this in mind while considering my request. I hope this will help and I will try my level best to comply with all the copyright and related regulations. Hopefully this will be sufficient enough. Kindly let me know your decision at your earliest convenience. Thank you!--Bugnot (talk) 14:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Seeing as you have been repeating the same problematic behaviour over a long period, you *have* been asked to stop doing it a number of times, and you have made the same promises before - why should we believe you this time? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Bugnot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay, I will submit any questionable content (about which I'm not sure if it is a copyvio

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Okay, I will submit any questionable content (about which I'm not sure if it is a copyvio |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Okay, I will submit any questionable content (about which I'm not sure if it is a copyvio |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Okay, I will submit any questionable content (about which I'm not sure if it is a copyvio |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

to a Wikiepdia administrator for prior review before actually contributing it. Please let me know if this would be enough. Wikipedia is free encylopaedia and I hope my right as a contributor will be respected. I will comply.--Bugnot (talk) 15:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)}}[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Bugnot. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 20:28, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ http://www.malecontraceptives.org/articles/ringheim_article.php
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bugnot&oldid=438428340"