User talk:Nair
| This is Nair's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
Lead on Nair article
Please can you leave the lead section of the Nair article alone. It will be completely rewritten once the main article is sorted out. It is impossible to write a lead without the article body being in a decent state. This is because the lead is intended to summarise the article. You are, unfortunately, putting the cart before the horse here. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 10:53, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 11:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sitush (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Nair
I have removed your last post at Talk_:Nair. Please can you do everyone a favour and let this issue drop? You admit that you are speculating and you are well aware that this is a very sensitive issue. There is no point in being silly about it. We are all aware that you & Chekon (who are probably the same) enjoy taking sly digs at Nair but if you persist in doing this then there will be consequences. Gaming the system, as you appear to be doing, is unacceptable. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 07:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Please grow up. Wikipedia is not censored. Deleting others' comments is not the worst thing you do. You are genuinely putting your time to spoil an article by making it unreliable at first read itself. I just answered a bragging comment from Raj. You deleted my answer and kept Raj's self-glorification. This is the latest example for your bias, of which I am very well aware already. I am not going to add it again because I hate (and have no time for) non-constructive SILLY arguements. Congrats. --KondottySultan (talk)
- Article talk pages are for discussion of the article, not the subject of the article. I seem now to be accused by you of bias in favour of Nairs and by others of bias against the Nairs. I guess that means that I am neutral, which is precisely where we all should be. Anyway, I have referred my deletion to an admin, even before your reply here. I am happy to see it reviewed and, if necessary, reinstated. - Sitush (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KondottySultan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sitush (talk) 13:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 07:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)August 2011
Your addition to Nair has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 04:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- I am well aware that some minor edits were removed as well as the copyrighted content. They were trivial. Now, please remove that content if you have again reinserted it. - Sitush (talk) 12:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- I have moved some paragraphs that describe origin theories of caste system to a new subsection. You reverted that edit also. Did you do it purposefuly? --Nair (talk) 12:43, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- "Sort of". It was trivial and I didn't see any particular need to keep the change & it saved cutting out the copyvio the hard way. However, if you prefer the layout like that then fair enough, I am not going to argue about it. If you reinsert the info about spittle etc then you need to cut it right back: as with the shaving stuff that you put in previously, it is a grotesque amount of detail for a trivial point and will only serve to anger people from the Nair community unnecessarily. The article annoys them enough already without adding any gratuitous content. - Sitush (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, but Wikipedia is not censored. I don't find any reason not to include things such as spittle, if there is proper citation for it. It is not Wikipedia's policy to hide or obliterate history simply because you think it may offend somebody. Thanks. --Nair (talk) 13:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- "Sort of". It was trivial and I didn't see any particular need to keep the change & it saved cutting out the copyvio the hard way. However, if you prefer the layout like that then fair enough, I am not going to argue about it. If you reinsert the info about spittle etc then you need to cut it right back: as with the shaving stuff that you put in previously, it is a grotesque amount of detail for a trivial point and will only serve to anger people from the Nair community unnecessarily. The article annoys them enough already without adding any gratuitous content. - Sitush (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2011 (UTC)