Jump to content

Talk:Cotton candy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.36.227.5 (talk) at 20:20, 13 December 2011 (→‎Quite yummy overall?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFood and drink Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

2006 Comments

The part of Pure Fun sounds like an advertisement. I thought this was an encyclopedia, not a market. Perhaps it could be toned down, but maybe it should just be eliminated all together.

W0w00r 17:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'll remove it now, despite lacking skills mostly. If anyone thinks it has a place in the article, and isn't vandalism, I apologise. --212.139.7.179 20:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page doesn't really have an encyclopedic tone to it. A little too "cotton candy is wonderful" feel. If no one objects, I'll tone it down in a couple days. Pnkrockr 20:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some cleaning and rearranging of the sections - they seemed too informal and out of "common-sense" sequence. -drewson99, 9/28/06

What fair was cotton candy introduced at? When was it introduced? -- Bozoid 13:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

diet versus non-diet

See diff. Most non-diet drinks are full of sugar. You must be confused, perhaps with diet drinks. Diet drinks are drinks containing less sugar than a non-diet ("regular") equivalent. Shinobu 11:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warm when dissolved

Is anyone else familiar with the warming sensation that occurs when cotton candy melts? Not just fresh floss, but bagged floss from candy isle does this too. Would any fine, quick-dissolving solute (like cotton candy) increase temperature when exposed to a solvent (like saliva), or is this just a sensory illusion exclusive to cotton candy? Durty Willy 20:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about the warming sensation you speak of, but any exothermic reaction will result in the release of heat and the warming therefore of the solution the reaction is occuring in. Obviously depending on the amount of heat released and the length of time involved, this may or may not result in a temperature difference perceivable by the tongue. For more info you should check out the reference desk as the talk page is for ways to improve the article, not discussing the subject of the article Nil Einne 13:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

99% of the time, dissolution is endothermic, so if anything, your tongue should feel colder. But I do get that warming sensation as well. Savager (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't of course matter what happens '99%' of the time. According to [1] amorphous sugar does have an exothermic dissolution in water. Given that candy floss is 99% amorphous [2], it makes sense that it's dissolution is exothermic. Highlighting the falacy of worrying about what happens '99%' of the time Nil Einne (talk) 10:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


the crystal sugar probably 'needs' more water, the 'water of crystalisation' 79.76.231.249 (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goeey and sticky

i have to ask why does cotton candy later get gooey and sticky like juice

Easy - it's absorbing moisture in the air. Savager (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have some more colours please

preferably linked--Mongreilf 16:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Health concerns

Although I'm sure it's pure evil, there's no evidence given that Tartrazine is the food coloring used in cotton candy. There are surely many manufacturers of cotton candy who use a wide variety of colorings. The source given says nothing about cotton candy, it just talks about Tartrazine, so I'm removing the section as irrelevant to this article. – jaksmata 19:03, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHY YOU NEED MORE USEFUL INFORMATION

you need more info on cotton candy for people who are doing reports or speeches on it or something —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.46.6.50 (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

I feel quite safe in saying that Wikipedia is not your cheat sheet. 76.166.158.55 (talk) 08:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the french name of this candy in the list?

I understand to have different English names, since this is the English Wikipedia. Why should we have the French name for Cotton candy? 80.101.187.6 (talk) 11:49, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't think of a reason. Well, not a good one anyway. And whoever added it messed up the punctuation too. At the risk of death by choking on a giant frog, I'll go ahead and remove it. //Carl T (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Or I would have. Jaksmata beat me to it. Carl T (talk) 13:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

"A typical serving contains approximately 100 calories" is in the lead of the article; how much is a typical serving? This is rather important, especially because the amount can be worked out, given the number of calories and nutritional information. 79.71.113.135 (talk) 17:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given that a tablespoon of sugar are 16 calories (ignoring the fact that is heated sugar), maybe 6 tablespoons of sugar could make a cottom candy the size of a carnival balloon, of course that doesnt help much, so i suggest delete that part until is resolved. Maijc (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quite yummy overall?

Resolved

I agree it probably is, but somehow that statement doesn't really feel very encyclopedic... 65.78.144.189 (talk) 08:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase has been removed.... it was vandalism that went unnoticed for several days, unfortunately. Thanks for pointing it out! Sailsbystars (talk) 12:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Usages among English variants

I live in Canada, and Cotton Candy as the terminology is quite popular. However, the British usage Candyfloss is also popular in Canada as well so I have revised that. 24.36.227.5 (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Galati[reply]